|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Should either the Stella Artois or Halle tournament be made a Masters? | |||
| No, I'm fine with no Masters on Grass |
|
4 | 14.81% |
| Yes, the Stella Artois should be made a Masters |
|
20 | 74.07% |
| Yes, the Halle tournament should be a Masters |
|
3 | 11.11% |
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 125
|
I think there should be a Masters event on grass.
|
|
|
|
| ZhuangCorp |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ZhuangCorp |
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: A not so parallel universe...
Posts: 5,271
|
Whether a tournament is officially designated as a 'Masters' event or not is irrelevant.
I'd just like to see a grass court season that lasts longer than a mere three weeks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 843
|
I'm with Deuce. More grass tournaments in general. And stop slowing the game down with heavy balls and longer grass etc...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 125
|
Why don't they have more grass tournaments anyway? Is there a particular reason?
|
|
|
|
| ZhuangCorp |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ZhuangCorp |
|
|
#5 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 12,900
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,625
|
The time between French and Wimbledon is too short to have a full grass court season. Wimbledon shouldn't be so stubborn, should move to a couple of weeks later.
|
|
|
|
| The tennis guy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The tennis guy |
|
|
#7 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 843
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 149
|
Yup, a longer grass court season is necessary. And Wimbledon certainly doesn't need to end the grass court season. There is a clay court circuit going on after Wimbledon for most of the summer, why does the grass court season have to culminate in Wimbledon?
This would mean more points for players like Ancic, whose best results come on grass. It will certainly be an interesting change at the top. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,390
|
Wimbledon is scheduled during the longest days of the year in England.
Grass courts were replaced by hardcourts to ease the expansion of tennis as a global sport. Reintroducing a longer grass court season is going in the opposite direction, not saying it's wrong, just saying it's going the other way.
__________________
Fed 2010: Federer aged 28 16 Slams(inc. career slam) vs Sampras aged 28 14 Slams(no FO) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,228
|
Hard courts are so tough on the body. At least grass is a little easier on the legs. The tennis season is already such a grind. I think adding some grass tourneys and maybe cutting back on the hard court events would be a great idea.
I know the guy who runs the westside tennis club would probably definitely be interested in perhaps running a major grass tourney in the states. He brought the master's cup to the US and also runs the houston clay court tourney. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 863
|
I think there should be a Masters on grass. If it's trying to represent meaningful competiton outside of the majors then replicating all the surfaces should be a minimum criteria. Whether Stella Artois (otherwise known as "Wife Beater" in the UK) would be happy to give up a tournament they have spent a great deal of money on promoting over the years is another question. Would it not be best to put yet another grass court tournament into the calendar to give the surface some greater representation. Even Coria won a match on grass this year! Where you'd hold it and when I don't know, but it would be great to see.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|