• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Why number of year end no. 1s is more important than total weeks at no. 1
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2013, 09:32 PM   #41
THE FIGHTER
Rookie
 
THE FIGHTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 242
Default

both are irrelevant stats. IMHO. winning majors on 3 different surfaces in the same year is obviously the end all be all. a lot of good players have year end no. 1 rankings and multiple weeks at number one. but winning slams on 3 surfaces in the same year? no one in history has done that, except the very best.
THE FIGHTER is offline   Reply With Quote
THE FIGHTER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by THE FIGHTER
Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Why number of year end no. 1s is more important than total weeks at no. 1

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse