|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 267
|
I took a clinic and the instructor fed us overheads very close to the net ("offensive overheads").
He said one good options on this shot (besides angling it away) is to make these bounce very high. He said some 12 year old juniors were able to make it bounce over the back -- you don't necessarily need to be tall to do it. He said the key is to keep a loose wrist and "hit on top of the ball". Does this mean the racquet is literally making contact on top of the ball? I couldn't get it to bounce high, but I am always used to hitting the overheads like a serve (7 o'clock to 1 o'clock) and not down on top of the ball. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 267
|
He said some 12 year old juniors were able to make it bounce over the back fence -- you don't necessarily need to be tall to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,007
|
On overheads I let them drop a little lower than my serve toss keep my wrist loose and pronate on contact to give it a nice pop into the court which will bounce it to the fence..sometimes over.
watch some youtube videos and know its not just swinging as hard as you can as some think...but a very smooth fluid motion. You see someone who hits them very well and it looks like it takes little effort and strength. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,289
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Limpinhitter |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Limpinhitter |
|
|
#5 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,468
|
This is honestly not hard to do. If you can hit a solid overhead, this should simply be a matter of choice. But as said above, finishing the swing as though you've swung either directly in front of you, or slightly out to the right will cause this. It's not a difference in power, it's simply a difference in trajectory. There are two problems: when you hit the higher one, you MUST make sure it clears the court, because it does not penetrate. If it comes down even near the back curtain/fence, it's extremely easy to throw up another lob. This usually means you need to be closer to the net than normal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,302
|
Quote:
It definitely feels good to hit one of these successfully, but I'm fairly sure that hitting an ordinary medium-tempo overhead with a serve motion is a better shot.
__________________
Head Youtek Graphene Speed Pro VS Gut Mains 16g @ 52lbs / RPM Blast Crosses 17g @ 50lbs |
|
|
|
|
| mightyrick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by mightyrick |
|
|
#7 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,378
|
If I get an easy lob within 10 feet of the net I can do this pretty easily. It's pretty much simple geometry..if I'm 6'1 and ten feet from the net hitting down on the ball isn't hard. Especially at clubs with back walls/curtains that are pretty close to the baseline, it makes your smash unreturnable.
Of course if you start trying to do this any further back you end up clipping the net.
__________________
3.5 player. Equipment: Prince NXG OS, Ashway Kevlar mains, Gosen polylon crosses |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,138
|
Swing hard, aim shorter than the service line, and if you're close enough to the net, you have the angle to bounce if over the backfence, except at certain courts where the backfence if 40' high...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 2D plane of existence
Posts: 857
|
I flick my wrist sort of whenever I hit a smash over my opponent, though I try not to hit it too high because if it goes over the fence I have to get it.
|
|
|
|
| OldFedIsOld |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by OldFedIsOld |
|
|
#10 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14,082
|
I have never once hit this shot. And I have had plenty of opportunities.
I'm 5'4". I guess I just don't see any reason to try this shot. If I am right on the net, I far prefer to hit a ball as sharply angled as I can. This ball will hit the side curtain or run away from even the fastest opponent because of the angle. I do have partners who attempt this spiked overhead. Ugh. I wish they would stop. Few of us are tall enough or strong enough to guarantee the ball will go completely out of play. I have run down many errant spiked overheads, and it is quite possible to win the point -- remember, my opponent was draped on the net. If I can get a racket on it and throw up another overhead . . . game on.
__________________
-- Random Error Generator, Version 4.0 -- Master Moonballer |
|
|
|
| Cindysphinx |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Cindysphinx |
|
|
#11 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,138
|
The difference between men's tennis and women's tennis is the PeteSampras leaping overhead....
No reason for it except it's FUN for guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 267
|
Quote:
A few of the short kids hit it over the fence and as well as much taller adults. The key is a loose wrist and hitting on top of the ball. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|