|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 260
|
In this Battle of the Sexes the 50 plus Riggs slaughtered the no.1 women's player Court. It's strange that there's such discrepancy between King v. Riggs (where King won comfortably) and Court v. Riggs. Did Court have a really bad day? Or was it a 'styles' issue, where Riggs' game suited Court but not King?
|
|
|
|
| sandy mayer |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sandy mayer |
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
|
I'd say a gambling issue, in the sense that Riggs was a big time sports gambler, and there must have been huge odds in that match.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 986
|
The conventional wisdom is that Margaret Court was psyched out by Riggs before the match even began. After that, Bobbie Riggs became overconfident and didn't train hard (which is death to a 55 year-old -- they lose conditioning fast), while BJK learned from Court's experience and strengthened herself mentally against Riggs' gamesmanship.
|
|
|
|
| Frank Silbermann |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Frank Silbermann |
|
|
#4 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,566
|
Three reasons.
First one is that Court signed on to play a tennis match but instead found herself in the middle of a circus. Riggs hadn't given her any warning and she froze, plain and simple. Second reason is far less popular but equally true - Court had just found out she was pregnant, was in the initial stages of morning sickness and had one of those days that every pregnant woman has and her coordination went out the window. It happened again, during her Wimbledon quarter-final, she lost the match and the chance at a second Grand Slam. Not a popular story as it didn't feed the hype from Riggs, the hype from King or the zeitgeist (Court was anti women's lib). Third reason and equally valid is that , according to Jack Kramer and Pancho Segura, Riggs' lack of fitness enabled King to win (he wasn't fit enough to take advantage of the short balls she kept dishing up). Segura (52 at the time, Riggs was 55) challenged King but, understanding he was a totally different kettle of fish, she refused. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Parts unknown
Posts: 11,916
|
Quote:
__________________
Volkl DNX9 - Legend17 m's / IsoProClassic x's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,464
|
Quote:
he really dominated the pros for a few years in the 50s, probably the best to never win a major(turned pro too soon) |
|
|
|
|
| Moose Malloy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Moose Malloy |
|
|
#7 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Parts unknown
Posts: 11,916
|
yes..that's where you could see how quick his hands were. he could hold the shot...hold the shot, then last second get his hands in the right place at the right time giving his forehand tremendous disquise..and remarkable power for such a little guy
__________________
Volkl DNX9 - Legend17 m's / IsoProClassic x's |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 986
|
I heard an anectdote in which Segura said to Jack Kramer, "If you didn't have that big serve, you wouldn't be able to beat me." Jack Kramer replied to Pancho Segura, "Yes, but if you didn't have that crazy forehand of yours, you wouldn't be able to get near the court without buying a ticket."
|
|
|
|
| Frank Silbermann |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Frank Silbermann |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,464
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Moose Malloy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Moose Malloy |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,566
|
Quote:
Regardless, that was the irony of the Riggs event: a mother-to-be losing on Mother's Day. Yes, she lost in the semis of Wimbledon, that's why I said she lost her chance at a second Grand Slam. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|