|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Below are my three choices for battle of the best portable ball machines. I am going to buy one of them though I do not know which one yet. I know I will be spending $1600-$1900. There are some positives and negatives in all three. I would like to hear your comments regarding the pros and cons of each and if you have used any of the three machines mentioned. Thanks
Tennis Tutor plus player model with remote: Ball capacity 150 Balls Trajectories Groundstroke to Lob Ball ejection speed 10-85 MPH Ball feed rate 1 1/2 to 12 seconds (+) Playing Time w/heavy duty battery 4 to 6 hours typical Recharge Time 12 hours, typical standard (-) Tennis Tutor Plus 20"H x 19.5"L x 20"W Weight Tennis Tutor Plus 46lbs $1750 plus $65 shipping one year warranty, they have a demo for $1600 plus $65 shipping 3 Player mode (+) Fast charger (1-3hours) $75 Total $1890 two function remote (+) Lobster Elite 3: speed10 to 80 mph Ball capacity: 150 Feed rate: 2-10 seconds Court time: 4-8 hours (6) Elevation: electronic 0-50 degrees (+) lobs Weight: 44 lbs. (+) Warranty: (+)2 years $1550, Remote $199 two function (+)compact/light easy to store with big wheels to push $1890 includes premium charger (1-3hours) plus remote, shipping $48 (they might waive) Playmate Portable: Holds 200 Balls (+) Battery standard life 6hours Variable Oscillation to 1, 2, or 3 Lines Pitches any Type of Tennis Ball (flat) (+) *Best pitching wheels commercial (+) ON/OFF Remote Control (-) Standard 6 Hour SMART Charger (+) 1 Year Limited Parts Warranty MSRP $1,695.00 USD (-) Heavy, (+)but durable commercial wheels, (-)no 2 function remote. My observations: The main thing about a ball machine is the consistency in pitching so all else are just bells and whistles. Which is why I am leaning towards the playmate portable even though it is heavy and only has on/off remote. But I do like the players mode and the two function remote and the premium charger found on the tennis tutor+ even though it is still a bit bulky Last but not least is the Lobster elite 3 with its compactness, also with premium charger and two function remote. In conclusion: 1. Playmate Portable for durability and reliability 2. Tennis Tutor for its features 3. Lobster for it compactness. Why don't they have a machine that is compact, loaded with features yet built like a tank. I guess you cant have it all. Any observation and comments welcome. Most important I would like to know about the durability of the pitching wheels of all three if there are any updates or issues since I have had bad experiences in the past. I have had one of the first tennis tutors jr. (20 years ago) which had bad wheels and battery that needed replacement. In the past, Lobster were not so great in the quality as well. I have used playmate before and these thing just do not jam nor break. Thanks Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 09-14-2007 at 11:37 AM. |
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 1,099
|
Most important features from my experience:
HIGH PRIORITY
But! If I were on a budget, and WANTED a ball machine, I would not hesitate to purchase a Tennis Tutor. Yes, the normal model with horizontally opposed throwing wheels. I think that's a great basic model for developing, grooving, and improving your strokes. ![]() Tennis Tutor Silent Partner |
|
|
|
| Jack & Coke |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Jack & Coke |
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,234
|
I read somewhere that the Lobster Elite 3 is the ONLY machine that offers 2 line drill WITH vertical oscillation. I also hear that the Lobster Elite 2 and 3 offers horizontal and vertical oscillation that's usually only found on higher end commercial machines.
I wonder if the Tennis Tutor Plus Player model does a good job in simulating player mode or not. I think this feature kinda gives it similar capability that the triple oscillation the Lobster Elite 2 and 3 have. I haven't seen any comparison between these 2 brands w.r.t. this aspect. I personally have a Tennis Tutor Plus (not the Player, just the plain Plus) and it seems pretty durable. I got it for free from my brother. But if I were to buy one on my own, I might have picked the Lobster Elite 3, unless there are reviews favoring the TT+ Player mode over the Lobster triple oscillation mode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Quote:
The side-to-side position and depth of each shot are not simply changed in a random or sweeping motion (like the elite 2/3) but are computer programmed to simulate the shot patterns of real players. This feature is found on their $5000 shot maker. It is very easy to switch between modes than to fiddle around with settings. |
|
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#6 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 620
|
I am with Jack& Coke. The SP Pro does it all and is a great value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
I see the two who are praising SP both have bought SP machines.
To me SP=Eagnas, biggest bang for the buck may not be the right choice. |
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#8 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 1,099
|
Yes, the Elite 2 is a very nice machine, and was one that I was considering:
![]() However, this unit is around $1,300-$1,500. I felt that compared to the Silent Partner and Tennis Tutor, it was overpriced a little bit for comparable features. Given the Elite 2's basic functions, if it was for around $800-$900, I may very well would have purchased it! |
|
|
|
| Jack & Coke |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Jack & Coke |
|
|
#9 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
I liked this post of yours, did you try out the elite?
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showp...8&postcount=19 they do have the lobster freedom for $799 which weighs only 35 lbs http://lobsterinc.com/content/lobster-elite-freedom.asp $$$ is not an issue, I want quality and reliability. And it seems that Playmate portable has the best commercial wheels ( I know that sucker weight 55lbs Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 09-14-2007 at 11:39 AM. |
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 1,099
|
wow a lot of questions
First, let me say that I'm not trying to push SP on you. That's just the machine that fit my needs - with portability (i.e. does it fit in the trunk of my car?) being the number one consideration. After 5-6 months (using it an average of once every two weeks), I am very happy and 100% satisfied with the performance, quality, and reliability of my machine. I know it is not one of your considerations. I just mentioned it as a point of reference so you know where I'm coming from. no. The floor room model they had did not have a charged battery. It was not the actual factory. It was more of an office/distribution building. I got the physically check out the Elite unit. "Kick the tires" so to speak. The unit was compact and heavy with a nice solid feel. The only questionable "issues" were the handle and cheap plastic wheels. The wheel axle does not go through the base of the unit and can eventually wear down and malfunction over time (for reference). The design (shape) of the unit is cool, but not practical as far as laying it on it's side for storage in my car trunk during transportation. A "rectangular" design like the TT or SP is much more practical. Quote:
But if $$$ is not an issue, I say go for the MOST EXPENSIVE unit that you're willing to lug around. If you can deal with the size and weight of the Playmate, then go for it! Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
| Jack & Coke |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Jack & Coke |
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,039
|
I actually think topsin is pretty important. I been hitting with a low-end machine (SAM), it doesn't provide spin controls. The balls are pretty easy to hit. But when you play with real persons the balls will have different spins, or slice from bh, and in my mind these are important, if a ball machine could handle that, great, if not, why paying $1500+.
|
|
|
|
| MichaelChang |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MichaelChang |
|
|
#12 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
WOW thanks for the ref link on the elite JC, it was a shocker. That is the kind of problem I want to avoid at any cost.
As for the most expensive machine, it would be the TT+player with remote and premium charger $1900, it is more expensive than the Playmate which I can get for $1695 out the door. How much did you pay for your SP pro programmable? they are now at $1389 not sure about shipping. Isn't it the same as the Elite 2 which is similar in price and similar in functionality less remote? what is so different from the SPpro Vs the Elite2 in terms of functionality? (not ball speed, capacity, weight) Now you got me thinking SP?!?! Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 09-14-2007 at 11:36 AM. |
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Quote:
Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 09-14-2007 at 10:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,039
|
|
|
|
|
| MichaelChang |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MichaelChang |
|
|
#15 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Oh ok, missed that, his SPpro does have spin, though , how about side spin ha ha, kickers etc.... need that too
anyway check this out, pretty nice chart of all. One thing I noticed is that they do not talk about durability which I agree, one can only find out in the long run how the machine holds up? I did notice that they indicate amps as battery life where both the SP and the playmate where 15 vs elite and tutor as 18 amp, very interesting http://www.racquetsportsindustry.com...elector_1.html |
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#16 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,234
|
[quote=michael chaho;1751825]WOW thanks for the ref link on the elite JC, it was a shocker. That is the kind of problem I want to avoid at any cost.QUOTE]
I've read many posts where people complained about the Lobster Elite wheels, too. However, I remember reading a post where the poster said he talked with Lobster support and he was told that Lobster was planning to redesign the wheel to fix the problem. I haven't seen anyone who said they bought an Elite with the redesigned wheel, though. But you might want to call Lobster support to see if they have done that yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
thanks I will do that
|
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#18 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
OK update: the pitching wheels are superior (different type of soft rubber polyurethan) on the playmate portable than the rest of the pack TT, SP, lobster which are hard. The wheels will function using NEW balls or bold balls and will not interfere with the functionality of the machine in the long run. I recall having to scuff up my wheels on the tennis tutor and I believe nothing has changed since then
Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 09-14-2007 at 02:25 PM. |
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 620
|
Quote:
I did not spend the $300. for the programmable option. I really was on the fence but having taken delivery, I find that I just move my self around the court for fh/bh practice and it works well. I hardly use the random sweep at all but the spin adjustment is priceless. Lobs are easy to set up and work very well. As you run your pressureless balls through the machine, the felt wears producing a sort of random action to the balls that is really nice. There is no way I would spring for the "player options" on any machine. $1500. to $1900. is too much $$$ for me + I use it to grove my shots. I am not looking for a electronic competitor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 1,099
|
I won an auction at that really big auction site for US $1,177.00
Regular suggested retail price for this machine new is $1498.00 Although it was a demo unit, they said "it was used less than 10 Hours and runs great. The machine was fully tested by thier technicians." Every now and then, search the big auction site for "silent partner machine", you can find demo units for hundreds less than retail. SPPP has custom horizontal angle settings for oscillation. Where Lobster and Tennis Tutor + have "2-line" features (i.e. preset sweeping angle), the SPPP is the only one where you can adjust the angle to any spread you want: ![]() Last edited by Jack & Coke : 09-14-2007 at 01:09 PM. |
|
|
|
| Jack & Coke |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Jack & Coke |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|