|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,758
|
High swing weight rods - anyone play with them? How many pro's use them? What are the advantages? Disadvantages? What's the view on them people?... FYI, I'm really enjoying experimenting with my Rad Tour Twin Tube XL (sw: 369 - it's like a battering ram!) And not least because it does kind of feel like I'm hitting a heavier ball. Anyway, cheers all...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,145
|
Stability, timing, feel... pass the thesaurus, please.
I'm used to a racquet that really wins the collision with the ball without flirting with mach one when I swing it. I also go to net a lot and I'm lost without a rather hefty bat - if I go forward with a light one, my half-volleys almost disappear and the ball feels like it's pushing the racquet around when I try to volley a hard drive. Largely subjective for sure, but I'm used to the physics, too. |
|
|
|
| fuzz nation |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fuzz nation |
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S
Posts: 821
|
all you two are saying is true, for me it feels great for the first 4 games of the match as match goes on the swing weight gets more heavy and speed goes down the tube, hence the serve and ground strokes suffer.
|
|
|
|
| grass_hopper |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grass_hopper |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,758
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,357
|
Well I would be very careful when saying that a high sw racquet is better for volleying... more stable? Yes! Easier to finish the shot? Naturaly! But if your oponent makes you think he's going to pass you on your right and he shoots through your left, the higher swingweight will make it tougher to return properly...
But I have to say I love frames with high sw... I have no idea what's the sw of my i.Prestige Mid XLs but it has to be higher than other i.Prestiges due to the length (27 3/4 inch to 27,5 of i.Prestige MP XL) and higher or equal mass (compared to most Prestige frames...) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,936
|
Quote:
__________________
"[Luke:] I can't believe it. [Yoda:] That is why you fail." |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|