|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#201 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 99
|
I'd like to be part of the FF! I just bought two M Pro No. 1 105s and have and older M Speed Pro No. 1 105 UL. They are all great but I had to add some weight to the throat and at 6 o'clock for a higher swingweight.
__________________
Yonex RDIS 100 MP strung with Babolat RPM Blast 16 at 55/53 Vantage 321 custom racquet strung with Babolat RPM Blast 16 at 56 |
|
|
|
| DC Tennis Fan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by DC Tennis Fan |
|
|
#202 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 632
|
i would like to join.................. just read the sig
__________________
(5x) fischer mspeed pro 1 98 with technifibre Black code 16 and head fxp 16 |
|
|
|
| federer envies me |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by federer envies me |
|
|
#203 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10
|
Firstly, please sign me up to the Fischer Faction. Currently I yeild the Fischer M pro number one 98 UL with VS team at 55lbs. I truly do find this a wonderful, precise and excellent racquet. However, I do want to try a raquet with a little more weight to it.
So my question is this: Have any of you fellow Fischer fans have any thoughts, experience or advice on the differences between the Fischer M Comp 95 and the M pro number one 98 SL? The obvious is, of course, to just go with the heavier model of my current racquet. However, I am very interested and curious about the M comp 95. I am an all court player who is in the midst of trying to become a serve and volleyer. Any information or thoughts you can share with me on this matter is greatly appreciated. It is fantastic to finally find those few lucky like minded who have spawned the Fischer Faction - great to be here! |
|
|
|
|
|
#204 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 5,488
|
Quote:
I'm going to demo the M Comp next week. I'll be sure to tell you what I think about it. I know Nick has used it before.
__________________
Tacos, fettuccine, linguini, martini, bikini. "if Federerer is the goat Nadal is the farmer" - Messarger |
|
|
|
|
| Djokovicfan4life |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Djokovicfan4life |
|
|
#205 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
How do you enjoy your Sl at 60lbs? What feel do you get? Have you had it lower or in the 50's? I know I am asking a lot of questions here but I think you will understand the reason as which ever racquet I choose I will again Have to purchase without trying it myself! ![]() Look forward to your answers and demo critique. Sincerely, John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#206 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 5,488
|
Quote:
I've found that 60 lbs is a good tension for me. Plenty of power and control. I've gone as low as 52 before, and as low as 55 on my SL. Not bad at all, but very powerful for my taste. Not that it makes that big of a difference at my level anyway. As my strokes evolve I may have to go higher to compensate for the powerful VS gut that I use. Matt
__________________
Tacos, fettuccine, linguini, martini, bikini. "if Federerer is the goat Nadal is the farmer" - Messarger Last edited by Djokovicfan4life : 07-18-2008 at 03:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Djokovicfan4life |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Djokovicfan4life |
|
|
#207 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
The Demo program is only offered in the coninental US so I am out of luck. Do you have any thoughts on if I go for the SL - would the heavier weight make for an obvious change in my string tension either way? Just thinking out loud here but does the increased weight of the racquet translate into any more power than the UL? John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#208 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 5,488
|
Quote:
__________________
Tacos, fettuccine, linguini, martini, bikini. "if Federerer is the goat Nadal is the farmer" - Messarger |
|
|
|
|
| Djokovicfan4life |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Djokovicfan4life |
|
|
#209 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Thanks Matt. I do look forward to hearing how your M Comp 95 demo goes! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#210 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#211 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 823
|
I have an Mpro no1 105 SL with kirschbaum touch multi mains and cyberpower crosses at 61/58
Great stick and very comfortable, I often use it but the TT Rad is still my main weapon. Do I qualify?
__________________
"Heavy is good, heavy is reliable. If it does not work, you can always hit him with it." - Boris the Blade |
|
|
|
| goldenyama |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by goldenyama |
|
|
#212 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 5,488
|
Quote:
Ground strokes: The first day I tried this frame out I was shanking all over the place. It definitely takes some getting used to, but after a couple hours with it I started to find the groove and started to smack the crap out of the ball. This is a great stick from the baseline. Loads of spin and control. Of course, the strings help a bit, but still, a sweet stick for baseline bashing. Serves: Serves were just OK for me with this racquet. I was able to generate decent power and spin, but I felt that there was a little too much weight in the head for my liking. It just felt a little bit sluggish to me, like I had to work to swing fast enough. Still decent though. Volleys: Ah, the curse of poly strings. I'm used to full Babolat VS on my M Pros, so to me these strings had very little feel at net. Sure, I could still hit some nice ones, but the feel just left me cold. Once again, too much weight in the head for my taste. My M Pros feel much more maneuverable at net. Overall: A nice frame, but I don't think I'll be switching to it any time soon. I'm really disappointed that it came strung with the polys. A decent multi or synthetic gut would have been much better for me. The groundies were definitely its redeeming quality, but for my all court style of play the cons seemed to outweigh the pros. Hope this helps. Matt
__________________
Tacos, fettuccine, linguini, martini, bikini. "if Federerer is the goat Nadal is the farmer" - Messarger |
|
|
|
|
| Djokovicfan4life |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Djokovicfan4life |
|
|
#213 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 183
|
will post pics of my fischers soon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#214 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 38
|
Been playing with the Fischer Pro Extreme FT for about 3 years.
|
|
|
|
| PlayerOnLI |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PlayerOnLI |
|
|
#215 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,726
|
I still have my Pro Extreme FT 95 as well - I have sold all my Fischers and so far did not want to part with the Pro Extreme.
I had it restrung and play with it every now and then. Still plays solid and a great paint job as well.
__________________
In D ZonE >>> WorD uP! <<< RQIS 1 Tour 95 and XL ; Solinco TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#216 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 38
|
Did Fisher provide a racquet comparable to the Pro Extreme in their new lineup of racquet?
As for your comment regarding the paint job, I agree the Pro Extreme is nice looking. The newer Fischer model are pretty gaudy with "Magnetic ++ Speed" in big bold neon green. Not that it matters while your playing, but every once in a while you'd have to look at it. |
|
|
|
| PlayerOnLI |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PlayerOnLI |
|
|
#217 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,246
|
I am in an extended demo of the M Pro SL, and I am liking it more and more. Initially I strung it at 52 with Babolat Attraction 17 (Multi), and it was nice and comfy, just too soft and mushy feeling with not enough bite on the ball. I restrung today with hurricane tour 16/og micro 17 at 55/57, and I have high hopes.
Still getting used to the grip on these new fischers as well. it felt great with the plastic on the handle, but without the plastic it feels too spongy and rectangular in shape, hard to find bevels. I might have to replace the stock grip with leather + tourna.
__________________
Yonex VCORE Tour 97 310g, Cyberflash 17g 58# (main), Tecnifibre Syn Gut 16g 61# (x) Yonex SHT-307 |
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 183
|
heres my 3 fischers
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 183
|
I just ordered a Fischer M Pro No. 1
105 SL. The red and green one. I thought it was the MSpeed Pro. Regardless, I am stoked. Do I have to actually have it before I can join?
__________________
"Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it." - Elwood P. Dowd |
|
|
|
|
|
#220 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,726
|
Just picked up a Fischer Pro #1 (2004) Red / black. This is one of the racquet I've been wanting to get but have not done till this last weekend.
Anxious to find out how it plays (waiting for delivery)
__________________
In D ZonE >>> WorD uP! <<< RQIS 1 Tour 95 and XL ; Solinco TB |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|