|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Do you know how to find out if you're in the upper, middle, or lower spectrum of your NTRP rating?
Ex. Like a high 4.5 or a low 3.5.
__________________
Pure Drive Roddick 2012 - Big Hitter Blue 17g - 54 mains/52 crosses |
|
|
|
| Doc Hollidae |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Doc Hollidae |
|
|
#22 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
|
You generally have to guess based on your match record and the records of the people you played against. There's nothing published that will help you. The main exception would be that if you succesfully appeal down, then you know you are at the top of your level.
Since you were bumped down from 4.5 to 4.0, I'd expect that you are near the top of the 4.0 level. |
|
|
|
| kylebarendrick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by kylebarendrick |
|
|
#23 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,647
|
I would not worry about the DQ if I was you. The 4.0 captains were obviously looking for you because you are out of rating, and they want to take advantage. They do this at their own risk. What's it to you if you get DQ'ed from the 4.0 You will just play back at 4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Quote:
__________________
Pure Drive Roddick 2012 - Big Hitter Blue 17g - 54 mains/52 crosses |
|
|
|
|
| Doc Hollidae |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Doc Hollidae |
|
|
#25 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 146
|
I would say you have nothing to worry about. I played 4.5 as a computer rated 3.0, went 4-2 at 4.5 and didn't get DQ'd from the 4.0 or 3.5 teams I played on that year. I would say that if you are computer rated, pretty much anything goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,997
|
Quote:
Also one time I found this guy in tennislink who got DQ'd playing 3.0 as a self-rate and then the next year he got DQ'd from 3.5 being computer rated. So it took 2 years for the guy to get put at the level he belonged. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
To make a long story short, I eventually started hitting with the other guys on this player's 4.5 team and they asked me if I wanted to play on their 2006 4.5 team so I jumped at the chance. Since I still had my 3.0 rating and I didn't really know where I belonged ratings wise at that point, I also played 3.5 and 4.0. Another captain rostered me on his 3.0 team but I never played on that team for obvious reasons. Looking back it was pretty funny to see the 4.5 team I was on and look down the roster at a bunch of 4.5s and see a 3.0 on the roster! Anyway, after that season, I was bumped to 4.0 and after last season bumped to 4.5, but I never did get DQ'd from the 3.5 team I was on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,647
|
You would never get DQ'ed for playing over your rating - only for playing beneath the NTRP. You can always play up if a captain will take you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 949
|
|
|
|
|
| randomname |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by randomname |
|
|
#30 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,647
|
I should clarify - a computer rated3.0 would never get disqualified by playing up and winning at a higher level. What would be the basis? Your rating will increase but you would never be above level of play.
Under USTA rule 2.02E(1) Players who inappropriately self-rate at an NTRP level lower than their actual skill level are subject to a Self-Rate Grievance. But under 2.02E(2) Players with a valid NTRP computer rating are not subject to Self-Rate Grievances. So - if you are computer rated, you would never be DQed at a higher level for playing and winning at a higher level. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
|
Self rate grievances have nothing to do with a 3 strikes DQ. You get a strike when your dynamic rating exceeds the threshold for the level you are playing. If a 3.0 player (self-rated or computer-rated) gets a dynamic rating in the high 3.5 range, then they'll get a strike. Do that 3 times and they are DQ'd up to a 3.5 rating.
It's generally difficult for a computer-rated 3.0 player that only plays in 3.0 leagues to generate dynamics in the high 3.5 range. It's much easier to generate dynamics in that range if they are winning matches at the 4.5 level. |
|
|
|
| kylebarendrick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by kylebarendrick |
|
|
#32 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,647
|
^^^^ I think we are talking about different things - you can get DQ'ed at a 3.0 level by playing up and winning at the 4.5 level because your NTRP would be above 3.0, but your matches at the 4.5 level would not be DQed because you are getting no strikes in the 4.5 matches because your NTRP would not be above 4.5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
|
Agreed! In this case the OP was worried about being DQ'd at the 4.0 level by playing up and winning at 4.5.
|
|
|
|
| kylebarendrick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by kylebarendrick |
|
|
#34 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 756
|
Anybody know for certain how long they wait after you've had three strikes to initiate the DQ?
__________________
I am going to win Wimbledon one day -- even if it is the over 40s doubles ..." Goran Ivanisevic |
|
|
|
| DrewRafter8 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by DrewRafter8 |
|
|
#35 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 514
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|