|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,290
|
Including balance and swingweight.
|
|
|
|
| bluetrain4 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bluetrain4 |
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: debajo del sol
Posts: 1,084
|
Wilson ProStaff 6.1 Classic
Head Size: 95 sq. in. Strung Weight: 12.6oz / 357g Balance: 11pts Head Light Swingweight: 326 Stiffness: 72 Beam Width: 21 mm Straight Beam Power Level: Low Swing Speed: Very Fast String Pattern: 16x18 |
|
|
|
| jasonbourne |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by jasonbourne |
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 893
|
my elbow hurts reading the specs.
__________________
Selling 2x Wilson K Pro Staff 88 and 2x Flexpoint prestige mid 2x Wilson Pro Staff Tour 90 |
|
|
|
| HeadPrestige |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by HeadPrestige |
|
|
#4 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,290
|
I've actually hit with one, but didn't know the specs. It does not, by any means, feel like a 72 stiffness rating. It's definitely firm, and not that flexible, but it in no way feels that stiff.
|
|
|
|
| bluetrain4 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bluetrain4 |
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,039
|
I believe there is also a 18*20 string pattern.
|
|
|
|
| MichaelChang |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MichaelChang |
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,616
|
Then there must be something wrong w/ your strokes. I hit w/ a Hyper PS 6.1 for 3 years, followed now by the Babolat PC+ '2001', which has identical stats. I've never had arm pain or fatigue, and I'm pushing 40...
__________________
"Nobody beats Vitas Gerulaitis 17 times in a row" -- Vitas Gerulaitis, after beating Jimmy Connors on his 17th try. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 893
|
Did i say i had elbow problems hitting with it? i was simply making a joke.. calm down.
__________________
Selling 2x Wilson K Pro Staff 88 and 2x Flexpoint prestige mid 2x Wilson Pro Staff Tour 90 |
|
|
|
| HeadPrestige |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by HeadPrestige |
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Check this out->
http://web.archive.org/web/199909111....html?PCODE=61 I've hit with one and it didn't feel like it was 12.6 ounces. It felt extremely manueverable and It played well.
__________________
-Brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 279
|
I didn't want to creat a thread just to ask this question so I post it in this existing thread.
I got me 2 PS Classic 6.1 MP from the bay. one is 16x18 the other is 18x20, I bought them to try them on. But I noticed they are quite different, The 18x20 has a more matte paint and says "Graphite Kevlar Composite, 80% graphite 20% kevlar" and the white buttcap with little letters code UKX and has a little sticker that reads "CHINA" on it. It has specs on the yoke and the wilson quality control sticker the 16x18 seems lighter and has a shinier paintjob and says "Braided Graphite Kevlar composite, 80% Graphite 20% Kevlar" and has the code XSV in the white buttcap. No specs in the yoke, it has the PWS system description instead and it doesn't have the "Wilson Quality" sticker. could you experts tell me, which one is older and some information about them ? ![]()
__________________
[2 K90,2 PS85] ♪Mi corazoncito esta de luto por tu amor, prendo dos velitas y te escribio una canción. No le digas a nadie... lo mucho que te quiero!♪ |
|
|
|
| Salsa_Lover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Salsa_Lover |
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,974
|
Just looking at the font of "Pro Staff", your 16x18 is older than your 18x20.
__________________
APDGT+, TB18 @ 48lbs, cheating with the 2012 PDR+ |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,039
|
I could be wrong but I heard the 18*20 is released in Europe and Asia, where the 16*18 is released in US.
|
|
|
|
| MichaelChang |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MichaelChang |
|
|
#12 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 645
|
check the length of the 18x20.
it is actually a longbody version of the 6.1 classic. if it is the same length, then the previous owner chopped off an inch from the handle. the longbody version had a denser string patter than the standard issue 27 incher.
__________________
Wilson Pro Staff User Cheap Players Club #143 |
|
|
|
| gsquicksilver |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by gsquicksilver |
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,974
|
Good catch! I forgot to look for the red shoulders.
__________________
APDGT+, TB18 @ 48lbs, cheating with the 2012 PDR+ |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 279
|
No, both are same lenght and there is no chopped bout.
__________________
[2 K90,2 PS85] ♪Mi corazoncito esta de luto por tu amor, prendo dos velitas y te escribio una canción. No le digas a nadie... lo mucho que te quiero!♪ |
|
|
|
| Salsa_Lover |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Salsa_Lover |
|
|
#15 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,246
|
If was done properly you wouldn't be able to tell if the handle has been shortened unless you remove the butt cap. I believe the racquet in the picture with the leather grip and the red shoulders was only produced as a "stretch" model. If it is the same length as the other racquet it has probably been shortened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,290
|
The 18 x 20 is the euro version
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 221
|
Does anyone know the specs for the 18x20 Euro version?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: behind your curtain
Posts: 1,886
|
Quote:
__________________
Team-Vantage member |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,152
|
Good find with that archive link there, B-R.
This racquet apparently has had stiffness ratings posted from up at 70-71 right down to maybe 66. I believe the 70 rating myself, but it's also never occurred to me that this frame should be especially hard on the arm just because it's so heavy. With a lot of inertia on board, the ball just doesn't knock it around as much as maybe a frame that weighs perhaps an ounce less. Volleying with this racquet is like standing Superman in front of a speeding bullet... listen for it... "plink"... Speaking of bullets, a buddy of mine got talking about the kevlar in these racquets and how that material is so good at absorbing energy at impact. While it's especially handy for making bullet-proof vests, it also has a deadening effect when it's used in racquet construction, at least in his view. This is what he believes makes for a more civilized experience with this stiff, heavy racquet that you probably wouldn't see with 100% graphite construction. No materials expert am I, but I'd bet that the kevlar takes some potential evil out of this frame along with the ProStaff 6.0 85's and even my beloved old Donnay Pro Cynetic 1's. |
|
|
|
| fuzz nation |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fuzz nation |
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,742
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|