• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Review of Fischer M Pro Number 1 98
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2008, 09:21 PM   #1
NLBwell
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,579
Default Review of Fischer M Pro Number 1 98

Hit with this racket for a couple days. First with no additional weight:
Groundstrokes - Wild. A lot of power when I hit the sweetspot. Usually went at least 10 feet out. Much more power than I am used to. Also, not being used to the lighter weight, I was probably swinging faster than I should have been. This was just an adjustment period, but the real problem was that there was absolutely no power just a little bit off the sweetspot. It felt like just a half-inch difference away from the sweetspot would cause the ball to bounce in front of the net versus landing way out. Volleys - better, but the same effect of absolutely no power just a little off the sweetspot. Didn't hit serves or serve returns.
Next added 12 grams of lead split along the sides of the head. Much better for me. Probably slowing my swing down with the extra weight, but the most important factor for the racket is that shots hit off-center only have a moderate reduction in pace versus hitting the sweetspot. You would expect this with added weight, but the amount of difference was surprising. First day hitting - Groundstrokes were excellent. I got surprisingly good spin and, with the spin, felt I could control the power well. Got pretty well grooved with the racket, letting the racket do the work. Could control the ball hitting reasonably flat, or hit pretty big topspin. Volleys were excellent. I felt confident with placing the ball where I wanted. Hit some serves at half speed and they felt fine. Serve returns on half-speed serves were good also.
Played a league match with it. Couldn't get the serve going at all. Still felt I was hitting at 1/2 speed, even though I was trying to go full out. Serve returns were consistent. I just couldn't get any kind of groundstroke or passing shot going. Unlike the previous day where the racket felt fine, I just had no confidence at all. Lost the 1st set 7-5, switched back to my usual racket and won the next set 6-3, breaking him twice and not losing my serve.

Overall - Like the MComp, I felt that the MPro#1 was unstable when torqued off center, though much less so. Weight along side of the head cured that, but slowed the racket down too much (probably need to mess with testing different weights). The stringbed was also much more reasonable than the MComp's wide edge, narrow center stringing pattern. It was very comfortable and surprisingly powerful for a flexible racket. Spin is pretty easy to get, and groundstrokes are very controllable with a little spin. Volleys feel good. Serve returns were good. The larger stringbed probably helps with both of these. Serves were disappointing. I serve better with mid rackets and was hoping this mid+ would be good, but it wasn't the case.

Technifibre TFight 335 and Fischer MComp review:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=196090

Yonex RQis 1 Tour review:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=198945
NLBwell is offline   Reply With Quote
NLBwell
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NLBwell
Old 05-29-2008, 03:57 AM   #2
iscottius
Professional
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,146
Default

what string and tension were you using? the description of your experience with the m pro 1 is very different from mine. The m pro is sensitive to string and tension. also adding 12 grams of weight will usually add power to a racquet.
iscottius is offline   Reply With Quote
iscottius
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by iscottius
Old 05-29-2008, 04:35 AM   #3
0d1n
Hall Of Fame
 
0d1n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Posts: 3,411
Default

My experience with this racket was very different as well. I found it had quite a forgiving (i.e large) sweet area and the power level was pretty consistent and lowish. I didn't see any variations in the power level as described in this review.
I agree with iscottius that the frame is sensitive to TENSION. I'm not sure about string types ... since it played well for me with full poly to full multi and everything in between (i.e synthetic gut and various hybrids).
What I mean by "tension sensitive" is that one needs to string it @ or bellow 25 kg for best results (and significantly lower when strung with poly).

Last edited by 0d1n : 05-29-2008 at 04:38 AM.
0d1n is offline   Reply With Quote
0d1n
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by 0d1n
Old 05-29-2008, 04:43 AM   #4
nickb
Banned
 
nickb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,293
Send a message via MSN to nickb
Default

I disagree with just about everything you said...the M Speed is low powered, flexible and is good at everything. Oh well...people like different rackets.
nickb is offline   Reply With Quote
nickb
View Public Profile
Visit nickb's homepage!
Find More Posts by nickb
Old 05-29-2008, 05:48 AM   #5
dan_the_man
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Default

I agree with the last few posts that the racquet is pretty low powered and control oriented. Stringbed is relatively consistent. And the sweet spot is pretty decent - average or larger than most similar spec'ed racquets.

dan_the_man
dan_the_man is offline   Reply With Quote
dan_the_man
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dan_the_man
Old 05-29-2008, 05:57 AM   #6
Djokovicfan4life
Legend
 
Djokovicfan4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 5,488
Default

Dude, what were you smoking when you tested this frame?

Serves have always been a huge improvement with this racquet, at least for me. The sweet spot does take a little while to find, but it's about as sweet as they come once you get used to it.
__________________
Tacos, fettuccine, linguini, martini, bikini. "if Federerer is the goat Nadal is the farmer" - Messarger
Djokovicfan4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Djokovicfan4life
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Djokovicfan4life
Old 05-29-2008, 01:30 PM   #7
NLBwell
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,579
Default

Looks like we have some lack of clarity in my writing as well as some possible disagreements.
First, the racket was strung with Volkl powerfibre, a multi which I don't know much about - I don't know what tension.
As far as power is concerned, I said it was "surprisingly powerful for a flexible racket." This is a players racket with a stiffness of 58 - I am not comparing it to a Pure Drive or any such thing. I'm comparing it to rackets such as the Prince Graphite Mid, Yonex RDX-500, RQis-1, Technifibre TFight 335, etc. I thought it had more power than any of those other rackets, even though it is less stiff than they generally are, so I was surprised.
I did not comment on the size of the sweetspot, but I thought it was reasonably large and comfortable. Past the sweetspot, I thought that power dropped off very quickly. I think the racket would benefit by something like a (real) Perimeter Weighting System.
As I said I just couldn't get my serve going. This is one reason I play with midsize rackets. Based on the early hits I thought I might be able to serve well with this midplus (which would allow me to play with a racket with more margin for error). I was disappointed when I couldn't serve well with it. For someone who can serve well with a midplus, I would think this would be a good serving racket since it does give "surprising power" and good spin.
If I thought it was a bad racket, I wouldn't have risked losing a league match playing with it. I would have seriously thought about buying it if I could serve better with it.
NLBwell is offline   Reply With Quote
NLBwell
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NLBwell
Old 11-14-2008, 04:53 PM   #8
Lendl
Semi-Pro
 
Lendl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 514
Default

Those that say this racket is sensitive to the string used what do you recommend? I have only used the racket for a week using a set up as follows:

Wilson Extreme - 16
55 lbs.
Two 4" strips of lead on each side at 3:00 and 9:00

Frame is very comfortable and just feels great in my hands but is VERY low powered and unstable when returning a heavy ball. I play mostly 4.5/5.0 players so they are firing some good pace shots at me and I like a lot about this racket but would like to find a better combination of power/stability with this frame.

Recommendations welcome
__________________
Babolat APDC - Synthetic Gut 55 lbs.
Lendl is offline   Reply With Quote
Lendl
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Lendl
Old 11-15-2008, 09:10 PM   #9
NLBwell
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,579
Default

Don't know about string setups, but I needed to add 12 grams of lead to get over the instability. Depending upon what kind of lead tape you have, that's probably more than you have no there now.
NLBwell is offline   Reply With Quote
NLBwell
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NLBwell
Old 11-15-2008, 09:19 PM   #10
pfchang
Professional
 
pfchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 1,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lendl View Post
Those that say this racket is sensitive to the string used what do you recommend? I have only used the racket for a week using a set up as follows:

Wilson Extreme - 16
55 lbs.
Two 4" strips of lead on each side at 3:00 and 9:00

Frame is very comfortable and just feels great in my hands but is VERY low powered and unstable when returning a heavy ball. I play mostly 4.5/5.0 players so they are firing some good pace shots at me and I like a lot about this racket but would like to find a better combination of power/stability with this frame.

Recommendations welcome
dude, thanks a lot for reviving the thread. you totally just stole major thunder from the thread i was about to write!

but as for the instability, i've added ~4 grams @ 12 to match my ideal SW and Weight as well.
__________________
APD'13
Gamma X2 Stringer
pfchang is offline   Reply With Quote
pfchang
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pfchang
Old 11-16-2008, 08:22 AM   #11
Lendl
Semi-Pro
 
Lendl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 514
Default

Sorry the OP linked t this thread and reading through it I just asked some followup questions

My lead tape is the 1/4" and I have four total strips on each racket, about 4" long. How does that translate to grams added?
__________________
Babolat APDC - Synthetic Gut 55 lbs.
Lendl is offline   Reply With Quote
Lendl
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Lendl
Old 11-16-2008, 10:10 AM   #12
pfchang
Professional
 
pfchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 1,245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lendl View Post
Sorry the OP linked t this thread and reading through it I just asked some followup questions

My lead tape is the 1/4" and I have four total strips on each racket, about 4" long. How does that translate to grams added?
1/4 gram is = 1"

so you have 16" total, which is about 4 grams, which is 0.14 oz.
__________________
APD'13
Gamma X2 Stringer
pfchang is offline   Reply With Quote
pfchang
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pfchang
Old 11-16-2008, 12:19 PM   #13
Lendl
Semi-Pro
 
Lendl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 514
Default

Wow, sounds very small for the difference in feel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pfchang View Post
1/4 gram is = 1"

so you have 16" total, which is about 4 grams, which is 0.14 oz.
__________________
Babolat APDC - Synthetic Gut 55 lbs.
Lendl is offline   Reply With Quote
Lendl
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Lendl
Old 11-16-2008, 12:33 PM   #14
jrod
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lendl View Post
...Frame is very comfortable and just feels great in my hands but is VERY low powered and unstable when returning a heavy ball. I play mostly 4.5/5.0 players so they are firing some good pace shots at me and I like a lot about this racket but would like to find a better combination of power/stability with this frame.

Recommendations welcome
Couldn't agree more....extremely comfy frame. Power is very low, even with lead added. Spin is exceptional. stability is not a problem as far as I've encountered hitting against 4.5 - 5.0 players. I've used it as my dubs stick for ~2 years. Groundies are a little short compared to what I get with k90 (singles stick). I use VS gut 16g in mains strung at 55 lbs and WC SS (~17g) in crosses strung at 52 lbs.
jrod is offline   Reply With Quote
jrod
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jrod
Old 11-16-2008, 04:36 PM   #15
Lendl
Semi-Pro
 
Lendl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 514
Default

I drilled with our travel team tonight and got a ton of work in and hit the Fischer alongside my MG Prestige Mid and just kept going back and forth all night.

The Fischer I used tonight was strung with 17g Wilson K-Gut Pro at 55 lbs. and it added a lot of power and spin relative to the 16g Wilson Extreme string strung at the same tension. The Prestige was strung with 17g NRG2 string which is very solid.

Two real good rackets, so completely opposite Really liking the Fischer right now after using these strings tonight. My arm was feeling much better and we were not serving tonight so on the groundstrokes I was able to hit out and really test them out.
__________________
Babolat APDC - Synthetic Gut 55 lbs.
Lendl is offline   Reply With Quote
Lendl
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Lendl
Old 08-06-2012, 06:25 PM   #16
blackfrido
Hall Of Fame
 
blackfrido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,254
Default

as August 2012, are there any still playing with this racquet?
I'm bringing of one mine back to life


__________________
if you focus on the results, you will never change. If you focus on change, you will get results
blackfrido is offline   Reply With Quote
blackfrido
View Public Profile
Visit blackfrido's homepage!
Find More Posts by blackfrido
Old 08-06-2012, 07:15 PM   #17
iMpro
New User
 
iMpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackfrido View Post
as August 2012, are there any still playing with this racquet?
I'm bringing of one mine back to life


I like that gray alot. You should throw some red trim on that to make it even sexier
__________________
Fischer Pro #1's, Tour Bite 16/Gosen OG 16 @ 55/56.
iMpro is offline   Reply With Quote
iMpro
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by iMpro
Old 08-06-2012, 07:28 PM   #18
blackfrido
Hall Of Fame
 
blackfrido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,254
Default

That grey looks good, but that's only the primer .
I haven't decided color yet, I'm prone to red or blue (Baghdatis blue)
__________________
if you focus on the results, you will never change. If you focus on change, you will get results
blackfrido is offline   Reply With Quote
blackfrido
View Public Profile
Visit blackfrido's homepage!
Find More Posts by blackfrido
Old 08-12-2012, 10:32 AM   #19
blackfrido
Hall Of Fame
 
blackfrido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,254
Default

one more coat and will be done

__________________
if you focus on the results, you will never change. If you focus on change, you will get results
blackfrido is offline   Reply With Quote
blackfrido
View Public Profile
Visit blackfrido's homepage!
Find More Posts by blackfrido
Old 08-18-2012, 01:39 PM   #20
blackfrido
Hall Of Fame
 
blackfrido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,254
Default

finally done!! New paint job. New Pacific grommets and new grip.
__________________
if you focus on the results, you will never change. If you focus on change, you will get results
blackfrido is offline   Reply With Quote
blackfrido
View Public Profile
Visit blackfrido's homepage!
Find More Posts by blackfrido
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Review of Fischer M Pro Number 1 98

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse