|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
|
I heard you have to do something like 50/50 stringing or stringing the crosses like mains?Any help?
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in. (2) Volkl C10 Pros |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,330
|
Which O3 racquet in particular?
To me the Prince O3 racquets are about the easiest to string. All the directions are painted on the racquet. Knot holes are marked for one and 2 piece. Dots are painted for the mains. If you string with one piece it tells you the short side. You can string with 2 pieces and you don't have to string 50/50. People who have troubles with a boomerang or brake make it sound too complicated. I don't know why they overthink it. It is easy. Last edited by LttlElvis : 07-11-2008 at 02:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
|
50-50 makes stringing O3 racquets two-piece much easier, but that does NOT mean that you have to.
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,330
|
YuLitle. Don't you think 50/50 is harder. You actually have to find the right center grommett in order for the end pieces to end on the right holes. The end holes are very specific and it requires you to count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 159
|
ha i'll admit when I 1st mounted an O3 frame I was a little intimadated. But really it is pretty easy all the directions make it pretty brainless
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 787
|
Quote:
__________________
Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour @ 56; Volkl PB7 @ 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
|
I dunno, i've just heard that most people string it one piece or string crosses like mains. is 50/50 easy?And you can string it regular two piece??
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in. (2) Volkl C10 Pros |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 462
|
Yes, you can string any O3 regular two piece, whether it be an Original, Ozone, or Speedport.
__________________
1 Babolat APDC GT with 17g. NRG2 at 61lbs. 2 Babolat APDC's with the same setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 787
|
Prince actually recommend that you string the O3 Red 2 piece and that the crosses must be strung top down or the warranty is void.
__________________
Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour @ 56; Volkl PB7 @ 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
|
Hmm. I've heard the 50/50 doesn't require the brake. How so?
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in. (2) Volkl C10 Pros |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,037
|
Prince says 50/50 is an acceptable method on the O Port and Speedport sticks. Yes, 50/50 does not require a brake because the strings will align to the point where the frame and touches the string and keep it straight. I would not advise 50/50 unless you know what you are doing. It requires a starting clamp as well as knowledge on how to start in the center of the stringbed WITHOUT losing tension. Amateur stringers tend to lose a lot of tension on the first pulls when attempting this method.
Last edited by Stan : 07-11-2008 at 07:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,609
|
i strung up an o3 white last week as 2 piece no problem. as others said, the directions r practically written all over the racquet, so its quite easy.
__________________
wilson nsix-one 16x18 (x3) testing a bunch of strings. |
|
|
|
| bluescreen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bluescreen |
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
|
50-50 is definitely The Suck, IMO. But, I've never tried it on an O3. I just know that it eliminates the brake issue.
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,028
|
What do you mean by the "brake issue"....is that using your hip when you pull the crosses?
Ken |
|
|
|
| kenshireen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by kenshireen |
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
|
Exactly......
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: behind you, but i have to be somewhere else by the time you look
Posts: 3,441
|
dude, you jsut string it, make sure the starting knot/clamp is on the side marked for it
__________________
saffin, man first, tennis player second I string 75% O3's, and i enjoy every one of them |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Silvis, IL
Posts: 8,061
|
without a boomerang the tension's not right, for instance, on a dropweight, if you just let it fall parallel without the boomerang in, the strings will be alot tighter, and much more difficult to clamp.
the difficulty of the hip technique is tolerable over the nasty tight tensions youll get if done improperly.
__________________
Allcourter. Tennis fan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
|
How is that? Wouldn't the extra string-to-boomerang friction plus the angles they turn around the boomerang decrease the actual tension?
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Silvis, IL
Posts: 8,061
|
i get what you're saying, but out of experience this is what happens. the strings average about 3 lbs tighter without the tool. it makes no sense to me either, but this is what has happened to me.
__________________
Allcourter. Tennis fan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
New User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 80
|
In my experience if you don't have a brake, you NEED the boomerang. If you use the hip method then you can still string it, but the consistency will be non existent.
Other than that, yeah they are probably the easiest frames to string because they practically have all stringing instructions printed on them. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|