• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Why can't you string a prince 03 racquet regular two piece?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-2008, 01:39 PM   #1
Mansewerz
Legend
 
Mansewerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
Default Why can't you string a prince 03 racquet regular two piece?

I heard you have to do something like 50/50 stringing or stringing the crosses like mains?Any help?
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in.
(2) Volkl C10 Pros
Mansewerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Mansewerz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mansewerz
Old 07-11-2008, 01:58 PM   #2
LttlElvis
Professional
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,330
Default

Which O3 racquet in particular?

To me the Prince O3 racquets are about the easiest to string. All the directions are painted on the racquet. Knot holes are marked for one and 2 piece. Dots are painted for the mains. If you string with one piece it tells you the short side.

You can string with 2 pieces and you don't have to string 50/50.

People who have troubles with a boomerang or brake make it sound too complicated. I don't know why they overthink it. It is easy.

Last edited by LttlElvis : 07-11-2008 at 02:00 PM.
LttlElvis is offline   Reply With Quote
LttlElvis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LttlElvis
Old 07-11-2008, 01:59 PM   #3
YULitle
Hall Of Fame
 
YULitle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
Default

50-50 makes stringing O3 racquets two-piece much easier, but that does NOT mean that you have to.
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle
MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed.
YULitle is offline   Reply With Quote
YULitle
View Public Profile
Visit YULitle's homepage!
Find More Posts by YULitle
Old 07-11-2008, 02:02 PM   #4
LttlElvis
Professional
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,330
Default

YuLitle. Don't you think 50/50 is harder. You actually have to find the right center grommett in order for the end pieces to end on the right holes. The end holes are very specific and it requires you to count.
LttlElvis is offline   Reply With Quote
LttlElvis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LttlElvis
Old 07-11-2008, 02:08 PM   #5
smarion2
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 159
Default

ha i'll admit when I 1st mounted an O3 frame I was a little intimadated. But really it is pretty easy all the directions make it pretty brainless
smarion2 is offline   Reply With Quote
smarion2
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by smarion2
Old 07-11-2008, 02:09 PM   #6
aussie
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LttlElvis View Post
Which O3 racquet in particular?

To me the Prince O3 racquets are about the easiest to string. All the directions are painted on the racquet. Knot holes are marked for one and 2 piece. Dots are painted for the mains. If you string with one piece it tells you the short side.

You can string with 2 pieces and you don't have to string 50/50.

People who have troubles with a boomerang or brake make it sound too complicated. I don't know why they overthink it. It is easy.
Couldn't agree more. Very easy to string on my Klippermate. slightly fiddly with the crosses using the boomerang or sharpie, but other than that, the O ports make inserting string tips a breeze. The markings on the frame make it a no-brainer.
__________________
Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour @ 56; Volkl PB7 @ 56
aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
aussie
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by aussie
Old 07-11-2008, 02:33 PM   #7
Mansewerz
Legend
 
Mansewerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
Default

I dunno, i've just heard that most people string it one piece or string crosses like mains. is 50/50 easy?And you can string it regular two piece??
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in.
(2) Volkl C10 Pros
Mansewerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Mansewerz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mansewerz
Old 07-11-2008, 03:30 PM   #8
Zach
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 462
Default

Yes, you can string any O3 regular two piece, whether it be an Original, Ozone, or Speedport.
__________________
1 Babolat APDC GT with 17g. NRG2 at 61lbs. 2 Babolat APDC's with the same setup.
Zach is offline   Reply With Quote
Zach
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Zach
Old 07-11-2008, 05:29 PM   #9
aussie
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mansewerz View Post
I dunno, i've just heard that most people string it one piece or string crosses like mains. is 50/50 easy?And you can string it regular two piece??
Prince actually recommend that you string the O3 Red 2 piece and that the crosses must be strung top down or the warranty is void.
__________________
Dunlop Aerogel 500 Tour @ 56; Volkl PB7 @ 56
aussie is offline   Reply With Quote
aussie
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by aussie
Old 07-11-2008, 06:35 PM   #10
Mansewerz
Legend
 
Mansewerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
Default

Hmm. I've heard the 50/50 doesn't require the brake. How so?
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in.
(2) Volkl C10 Pros
Mansewerz is offline   Reply With Quote
Mansewerz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mansewerz
Old 07-11-2008, 06:58 PM   #11
Stan
Professional
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,037
Default

Prince says 50/50 is an acceptable method on the O Port and Speedport sticks. Yes, 50/50 does not require a brake because the strings will align to the point where the frame and touches the string and keep it straight. I would not advise 50/50 unless you know what you are doing. It requires a starting clamp as well as knowledge on how to start in the center of the stringbed WITHOUT losing tension. Amateur stringers tend to lose a lot of tension on the first pulls when attempting this method.

Last edited by Stan : 07-11-2008 at 07:00 PM.
Stan is offline   Reply With Quote
Stan
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Stan
Old 07-13-2008, 07:59 AM   #12
bluescreen
Hall Of Fame
 
bluescreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,609
Default

i strung up an o3 white last week as 2 piece no problem. as others said, the directions r practically written all over the racquet, so its quite easy.
__________________
wilson nsix-one 16x18 (x3)
testing a bunch of strings.
bluescreen is offline   Reply With Quote
bluescreen
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by bluescreen
Old 07-13-2008, 10:45 AM   #13
YULitle
Hall Of Fame
 
YULitle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LttlElvis View Post
YuLitle. Don't you think 50/50 is harder. You actually have to find the right center grommett in order for the end pieces to end on the right holes. The end holes are very specific and it requires you to count.
50-50 is definitely The Suck, IMO. But, I've never tried it on an O3. I just know that it eliminates the brake issue.
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle
MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed.
YULitle is offline   Reply With Quote
YULitle
View Public Profile
Visit YULitle's homepage!
Find More Posts by YULitle
Old 07-13-2008, 04:33 PM   #14
kenshireen
Professional
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,028
Default

What do you mean by the "brake issue"....is that using your hip when you pull the crosses?

Ken
kenshireen is offline   Reply With Quote
kenshireen
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kenshireen
Old 07-13-2008, 05:07 PM   #15
YULitle
Hall Of Fame
 
YULitle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenshireen View Post
What do you mean by the "brake issue"....is that using your hip when you pull the crosses?

Ken
Exactly......
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle
MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed.
YULitle is offline   Reply With Quote
YULitle
View Public Profile
Visit YULitle's homepage!
Find More Posts by YULitle
Old 07-13-2008, 08:18 PM   #16
iplaybetter
Hall Of Fame
 
iplaybetter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: behind you, but i have to be somewhere else by the time you look
Posts: 3,441
Default

dude, you jsut string it, make sure the starting knot/clamp is on the side marked for it
__________________
saffin, man first, tennis player second
I string 75% O3's, and i enjoy every one of them
iplaybetter is offline   Reply With Quote
iplaybetter
View Public Profile
Visit iplaybetter's homepage!
Find More Posts by iplaybetter
Old 07-13-2008, 08:23 PM   #17
Cup8489
Legend
 
Cup8489's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Silvis, IL
Posts: 8,061
Default

without a boomerang the tension's not right, for instance, on a dropweight, if you just let it fall parallel without the boomerang in, the strings will be alot tighter, and much more difficult to clamp.

the difficulty of the hip technique is tolerable over the nasty tight tensions youll get if done improperly.
__________________
Allcourter. Tennis fan.
Cup8489 is offline   Reply With Quote
Cup8489
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Cup8489
Old 07-13-2008, 09:21 PM   #18
YULitle
Hall Of Fame
 
YULitle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Guymon, OK
Posts: 4,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cup8489 View Post
without a boomerang the tension's not right, for instance, on a dropweight, if you just let it fall parallel without the boomerang in, the strings will be alot tighter
How is that? Wouldn't the extra string-to-boomerang friction plus the angles they turn around the boomerang decrease the actual tension?
__________________
Michael A. -- If your flaw in stringing is consistency, http://www.youtube.com/yulitle
MRT 07-08 -- your stringing will be consistently flawed.
YULitle is offline   Reply With Quote
YULitle
View Public Profile
Visit YULitle's homepage!
Find More Posts by YULitle
Old 07-13-2008, 09:27 PM   #19
Cup8489
Legend
 
Cup8489's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Silvis, IL
Posts: 8,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YULitle View Post
How is that? Wouldn't the extra string-to-boomerang friction plus the angles they turn around the boomerang decrease the actual tension?
i get what you're saying, but out of experience this is what happens. the strings average about 3 lbs tighter without the tool. it makes no sense to me either, but this is what has happened to me.
__________________
Allcourter. Tennis fan.
Cup8489 is offline   Reply With Quote
Cup8489
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Cup8489
Old 07-13-2008, 11:50 PM   #20
Schwiz
New User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 80
Default

In my experience if you don't have a brake, you NEED the boomerang. If you use the hip method then you can still string it, but the consistency will be non existent.

Other than that, yeah they are probably the easiest frames to string because they practically have all stringing instructions printed on them.
Schwiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Schwiz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Schwiz
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Why can't you string a prince 03 racquet regular two piece?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse