|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: A Town Called Malice
Posts: 7,172
|
We hear people talk about modern strings all the time and how they help modern players generate massive amounts of spin. I was wondering whether one can say that Federer benefits from modern strings. Federer uses luxilon in the crosses and natural gut for mains. The mains are the strings that impart the vast majority of topspin on the ball. Djokovic does exactly the same thing.Are Federer and Djokovic benefitting from "modern strings" by using them in crosses?
|
|
|
|
| Sid_Vicious |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Sid_Vicious |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,418
|
Well Federer and Djokovic both put about 2800rpms on the ball according to Fowler. Agassi was around 1800. It's hard to draw a straight comparison though. But natural gut is also very capable of generating heaps of spin. See the table here:
http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/lear...ementPart2.php If you take a look at this table you can see that the 90s players hit with a tremendous amount of spin as well: http://www.advancedtennis.com/results/groundmen.htm Bruguera averaging as much as Nadal on the forehand at 3300 and he used VS gut. Gut is very powerful. The idea seems to be having a half a bed of polyester to tame the power of gut and add more control. Generating spin with natural gut is not the problem.
__________________
Prince Precision 730 - Genesis Twisted Razor 55lbs |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,227
|
In a hybrid, having copoly for mains OR crosses will reduce the friction of the other string allowing it to spring back and help with spin. So you don't need a full bed of poly to get the advantages of poly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 476
|
I thought the advantage of poly b/c of less friction.. 2 poly main and cross produce vibration after the ball hit and it like a sling shot put spin on the ball.. yes, there is a scientific study on this.. so the point of hybrid will make it less spin compare poly/poly.. There was a full scientific published on this matter.. very very detail.. The slow down the string bed to 10,000 of seconds and they see the effects clearly..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,401
|
I don't want to get into the science because it hurts my head but my rule of thumb is poly=less power, more spin, more directional control and gut=more power, more feel, good spin, and good directional control. Mains dominate characteristics of stringbed and crosses influence characteristics of stringbed.
I use poly/gut to tone down the power and increase spin. I use gut/poly to get more power and feel but still benefit with a little more spin from the poly cross. I don't have any studies but all poly will probably produce more spin than gut/poly or poly/gut. Gut/poly volleys much better than poly/poly or poly/gut. Softer mains give more feel and spring from the stringbed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: T-dot
Posts: 1,780
|
Well said, I think you've put it best. And gut mains with poly crosses is the spinniest combo found in tests by TWU.
__________________
Head MGPMs: Pacific Classic Gut 1.25 x MSV Co-Focus 1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,911
|
Murray also combines alu/vs team gut. Three of four top pros, hmmm? Soderling, Berdych, tsonga, Delpo, gulbis, all use alu. (Tsonga switched back from rpm.) Alu is teflon infused aluminum fluorocarbon resin. It slides grabs and snaps back as if it never moved at all. Does the same when combined with gut. The amount of snap back changes the angle of the shot off the bed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 3,823
|
Quote:
Maybe you should read the OP again... How does it "grab" and so on if in crosses? Sure it does, but it sounds like it would be doing more of that if in the mains... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,810
|
TWU hasn't published any test results showing the spin potential of gut mains/poly crosses. They published results of inter-string static and sliding friction with that combo and gut/poly is very slippery. This suggests it should be very spin friendly, and many players report that it is (I think so too), but there is, as yet, no objective evidence that it is.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|