|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
|
I feel like my backhand is becoming a bigger weapon than my forehand (at least at the moment), and I wonder which backhand I should imitate more to get the most out of my backhand.
Safin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WReGiDn9tU8 Nalbandian http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vM2s8q1cOpI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90HhzBiU_K0 From what I can see, the only difference my untrained eyes can notice is a slightly longer takeback by Nalbandian. As of now, that is my only concern. I'm getting better at taking my backhand off the rise, and I don't want to extend my takeback too much to make taking it off the rise harder. Does Nalbandian take it off the rise well? How about Safin? Who does it better? Thanks
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in. (2) Volkl C10 Pros |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,824
|
Nalbandian and Safin fundamentally have different backhands from a more advanced standpoint (meaning minuscule things that would never apply to amateur players like us).
Safin usually has his arms fairly close to his body, and hits with an eastern forehand grip with his left hand. Nalbandian has a bigger take back and a bigger loop than Safin, and hits with a semi-western to western backhand. There's alot more to it, but that is the general gist. Nalbandian actually has the more conventional backhand though because he's a little bit less flashy than Marat. Safin tends to do abit too much driving and hits abit too flat for my tastes. Nalbandian can drive and spin very well, but also has a fairly easy motion to copy compared to Safin, who's actually not as easy to copy as you think.
__________________
"man... what match is this? The Iron Hands vs The incredible Shanker..." - Gorecki, Federer vs. Ferrer Cincinnati 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,457
|
Nalbandian's backhand is better from defensive positions, and he uses his left hand on the backhand better than anyone. This to me makes it a more versatile shot as he can hit it hard and flat like Safin or he can find sharp angles or apply heavy spin when he needs to.
I would say Nalbandian's backhand is the better of the two to imitate |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 485
|
I have always been a fan of Safin's backhand. When he's on, he can do the most on that side than almost any other player.
__________________
Yonex RDiS 100 Midplus, Tourna Poly Big Hitter Silver 17 @ 54lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
|
Really? I'm surprised Nalbandian's is easier to copy. I always thought his was more complex.
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in. (2) Volkl C10 Pros |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 359
|
NAMRanger,
If you're up for it, could you break down Nalbandian's backhand for me, either here or in a new thread? Or if you have before could you post a link to that? I've recently decided to start my backhand from scratch, not that it was any good to begin with, and I'm trying to adapt a simplified Nalbandian style backhand to use, and any analysis of the stroke would helpe me tremendously. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Stuck in the Matrix somewhere in Santa Clara CA
Posts: 7,747
|
The bottom line is that you should do what works best for you -- given your physique/anatomy, skill level and game. If you find that the Safin technique suits you and it produces good results, then go with it. Whether you emulate Safin or Nalbandian, you should adapt/modify it to your own body and ability level. Quite often, the pros will execute versions of some shots that are just too advanced for us mere mortals to get away with. Best to simplify, if needed -- find what works best for you.
__________________
. Every tool is a weapon -- if you hold it right. (~Ani DiFranco) |
|
|
|
| SystemicAnomaly |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by SystemicAnomaly |
|
|
#8 |
|
New User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
|
I like Safin's better, but like systemicanomaly said: do whatever works for you. It's ok to base it off a pro's technique, but if you have to make a few changes here and there to make it work for you, don't be afraid to stray from Safin's or Nalbandian's style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,645
|
My backhand evolved over time (13 years). Originally, I just wanted to hit 2HBH because Agassi made it look so bad ***.
I hit flatter now because I had to change my left hand grip from semiwestern to eastern (darn wrist injury). I love going down-the-line when the opportunity presents itself (Safin trademark). I get a kick out of hitting sharp-angled cross-court backhands when I can pull it off (Nalbandian trademark). Now if I could have Safin's power, Nalbandian's angles, and Rios' smoothness I'd be all set.
__________________
"The two-hander is just a more secure ball." - Navratilova Dunlop 4D 300/M-Fil 400/Aerogel 300. Babolat PS. 2HBH/Cheap Players club's CEO Last edited by soyizgood : 07-27-2009 at 05:42 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 942
|
Here they are one against the other!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCEJQ0NEe4Y Safin's is a little unconventional I feel in that sometimes his right arm almost appears to be in a continental grip, making for a very flat backhand. Like others have said Nalbandian's is smoother and more versatile, but lacks the pace. I think it's a tie! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,885
|
Quote:
In other words, find the grips you like. Learn how the arms shape in the swing. Strengthen the top arm. Use your legs in the stroke. What will happen is you will then develop your backhand without worrying about "who you look like." Just develop your backhand around sound instruction and let you be you in your backhand.
__________________
Former USPTA Teaching Professional Volkl Tour 10 V-Engine Mid/Luxilon Big Banger |
|
|
|
|
| Bungalo Bill |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Bungalo Bill |
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 85
|
Also just keep in mind that those legendary Nalbandian acute crosscourt angles are the result of a 28in. racquet. Not that he couldn't produce epic trajectories with a 27in...just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
| Double bagel |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Double bagel |
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2008
Location: on a tennis court
Posts: 1,821
|
safin, hands down.. one of the best of all time
__________________
Stanford Tennis Alumni- Class of 2006 61-24 record over 4 years Head Flexpoint Prestige- Pro Supex Strings- Go Cardinals!! |
|
|
|
| stanfordtennis alum |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by stanfordtennis alum |
|
|
#14 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,824
|
Quote:
Nalbandian has alot less moving parts in his backhand, while Safin starts out bent, then drops, and then pulls up to hit. Nalbandian more or less starts out with a fairly straight take back. Safin's backhand is quite intricate to Nalbandian, who has a fairly straight forward backhand (gets in position, takes back, drops, lifts and hits). However, it really doesn't matter as Bungalo Bill said, because you should focus on what allows you to make clean contact.
__________________
"man... what match is this? The Iron Hands vs The incredible Shanker..." - Gorecki, Federer vs. Ferrer Cincinnati 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Madagascar.
Posts: 236
|
Just don't imitate, do what feels good to you, and stick with it.
__________________
*ˇ~-.¸¸,.-~*'Never live in the past but always learn from it¨'*ˇ~-.¸¸,.-* Four(4) Head MicroGel Prestige Mid - Babolat Pro Hurricane Tour/VS Gut @ 53 |
|
|
|
| Drop Shot 11 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Drop Shot 11 |
|
|
#16 |
|
Professional
|
I would say that both of them have backhands that are more similar than they are different. I wouldn't focus on the parts where they're different. They both have key elements like unit turn, hip rotation, extension through the ball...once you learn a fundamentally sound backhand, then your own 'style' should develop from there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caught in No Man's Land
Posts: 9,168
|
Quote:
I'm just curious though. Does Nalbandian hit off the rise well?
__________________
Gameplan: Get it deep, wait for the short ball, then come in. (2) Volkl C10 Pros |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 607
|
He could do everything with his backhand, especially hit off the rise.
__________________
(2) Head i.Prestige Mid 13.1oz 8PTS headlight. Now strung with Luxilon Big Banger ALU Power 16L string at 53#'s. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NW Emaunel-ville
Posts: 619
|
I am 100% behind everybody that says find the backhand that works for you. Since you like your backhand, i'd change nothing.
Do you want to plow flat through and hit it back with some pace, or scoop it up and load it with topspin. Find what works for you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,019
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnfsK...eature=related
I actually like Nadal's forehand a lot. Simple technically, you can get some good results. None of that fancy stuff that Safin and Nalbandian seem to have. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|