|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 590
|
I believe it is Edberg or Rafter? Yes, Johnny Mac was a genius, but he had a much much better serve than Rafter or Edberg...
I wonder who would win that match, Edberg or Rafter on USO surface or old vintage grass? |
|
|
|
| President of Serve/Volley |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by President of Serve/Volley |
|
|
#2 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 590
|
SOB, I spelled it wrong... Jeez, I am a wuss....
|
|
|
|
| President of Serve/Volley |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by President of Serve/Volley |
|
|
#3 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,961
|
Tough choice.
Don't rule out Mac because of his serve, and don't underestimate Edberg's serve--it was excellent. I'd take Edberg's second serve over anyone's (except Sampras's). I believe that Mac and Edberg are the best volleyers of the Open Era.
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Home of the 2010 Winter Olympics
Posts: 2,046
|
Edberg is the best technical volleyer, but Mac was a magician at the net . . . . . best instincts at net ever.
A lot of people underrate Henman's volleys IMO. No, he's not nearly as good as Edberg/Mac, but still, you'd think he'd be in the discussion. |
|
|
|
| TheFifthSet |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TheFifthSet |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Windsor, England
Posts: 3,987
|
Quote:
The trouble with Henman is that he would always seem to miss the really important ones
__________________
:) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 305
|
Best Backhand volley I have ever seen was Roy Emersons. Forehand side there are lots to choose from. Hoad, Roche, Newk among them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 865
|
Cash and Rafter were two of the best low forehand volleyers i've seen. They were both capable of hitting a low volley at full stretch and maintaining offensive control of a point.
__________________
the past is gone forever and the future never gets here |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,566
|
Quote:
Edberg is the pat answer but I couldn't disagree more. On the backhand side, yes, Edberg had the much stronger shot. However, on the forehand side, Edberg wasn't as technically proficient as Rafter. Quote:
Forehand volley - I'd go with Frank Sedgman. Excellent touch, great power (it was a kill shot - if he got a forehand volley the point was over) and considerably more reliable than any other player on that side (players make far more errors on the forehand volley than the backhand). gpt, Tim Mayotte was another player who was brilliant on the low volley. I'd also put Lew Hoad up near the top of that list. I've seen footage of him hitting low volleys and the amount of power he could generate was quite amazing. He got down so low his knee was brushing the court but he kept perfect balance and always hit through the shot. I was fortunate to be down at court level (calling service line) for quite a number of matches involving a plethora of great volleyers like Cash, Edberg, McEnroe and the Woodies. What stays with me is that when Edberg hit a backhand volley or Cash hit a forehand volley it was like someone had fired a cannon. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,275
|
I've seen Edberg mentioned a lot as the best "technical" volleyer, as where McEnroe is often cited as having the best touch and is more of a magician.
But, doesn't this take something away from each of them? Edberg looked more mechanical than Mac, so we assume less feel, less touch, but he had that in spades. And, from a technical standpoint, I don't know why McEnroe isn't as technically sound as Edberg, maybe it's the look of his strokes. All I know is that the key to great volleying is compact strokes and keeping the racquet out in front. From a technical perspective, Mac had these qualities as much as anyone. |
|
|
|
| bluetrain4 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bluetrain4 |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,624
|
Quote:
In terms of technical development, yes, Mcenroe's quirky style made him seem less sound than he actually was. He certainly was as strong as Edberg in many technical departments, but in some, eg. footwork and getting down low, he was not nearly as good or as consistent as Edberg. Again, he simply used his hands to compensate. Edberg, had magnificent touch, but he still used his legs and body in about as close to text-book perfection as anybody could against the opposition he faced. These 2 are the best I have ever seen. Rafter is not in the picture, I"m afraid.... and that's no insult to him. In fact, he might even have been as effective, or nearly as effective up there as Edberg or Mac...so in that sense, I'm almost deducting style points, for touch, variety, grace, and sheer talent. |
|
|
|
|
| Datacipher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Datacipher |
|
|
#11 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: at the bottom of every hill I come to
Posts: 11,113
|
A few years ago, Agassi and Laver played McEnroe and Roche on grass at the Tennis Hall of Fame. Agassi drilled several balls from the baseline at Roche who volleyed them back really routinely. All the players were miked and Laver said "Not to his backhand!" speaking to Agassi about his shot selection to Roche. Agassi's reply was "I know...I'm trying!".
Roche does indeed have probably the best backhand volley ever.
__________________
Wilson Steam 99S poly Luxilon 4G 1.25 @ 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ometepe, Krec'h Morvan, Queyras, Kerguelen Islands, Sierra del Diablo, etc.
Posts: 8,008
|
Quote:
hard to choose... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,039
|
McEnroe was the most serve oriented s&v. Rafter was the most easily balanced. Stefan was the most volley oriented s&v. Definitely Edberg.
|
|
|
|
| darthpwner |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by darthpwner |
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Rafter because he's an Aussie
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,871
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wHaN2h21ANs
sorry but i cant help post this again, even if its been posted so many times before in volley threads |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Fort Leavenworth, KS
Posts: 1,135
|
|
|
|
|
| cadfael_tex |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by cadfael_tex |
|
|
#17 | |
|
New User
|
Quote:
My favorite is McEnroe, but I can't see how you could go wrong with any of the names mentioned above. They were all outstanding in their own way.
__________________
Former USPTA Teaching Professional - Current USRSA Member Dunlop Max 200g Pro - Custom 14.5 oz, 9 pts HL, 47 lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,145
|
Quote:
I'm glad you mentioned Frank Sedgman. Jack Kramer wrote that anything that Sedgman got his racket on at the net was almost always a putaway. Vines rated Sedgman very highly as a volleyer also as well as Jean Borotra. People sometimes forget about Ken Rosewall but Rosewall had a great backhand and forehand volley. I remember they polled the players in the mid 1970's when Rosewall was in his forties and they rated Rosewall's backhand and forehand volleys among the best at that time. I think both volleys were ranked second but I am not sure. So even in his forties, Rosewall had a great volley. I liked McEnroe's volleys but the form could be awful at timesl. It was just amazing talent allowing him incredible volleys. I loved watching him at the net. What beautiful touch! Last edited by pc1 : 10-01-2009 at 07:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 483
|
Quote:
I grew up watching JMac, so I have a certain bias toward the issue. He was just amazing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
I am biased towards Emmo because I saw him play a lot more than I saw Roche. Emmo played WTT on the bat area team so I saw him live a lot. I still remember his doubles play as un worldly. Certainly do not see anyone today that can match his net play. JMHO Good call on Sedgeman as well! JD28 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|