|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 1,333
|
I really think it is. We always talk about her amazing forehand but why don't we ever talk about her serve too? It's surely one of the greatest women's serves in history. It was one of the most powerful serves of her era and the placement was sublime, it was extremely effective both out wide and down the line. Plus the service motion was beautiful.
|
|
|
|
| Lionheart392 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lionheart392 |
|
|
#2 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 457
|
she had a great 1st serve but an average 2nd serve. although i will say her 2nd serve was reliable (although mediocre and attackable).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,594
|
Name who in the 90s had a better second serve. Thanks. Actually other than Serena who today has a better 2nd serve then Graf. Venus, Safina, Dementieva, Jankovic, ROTFL!!
|
|
|
|
| grafselesfan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grafselesfan |
|
|
#4 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 457
|
they all have crappy 2nd serves
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 28,952
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,594
|
Quote:
Even the greatest womens returners are not able often to attack the Graf 2nd serve. Seles, the William sisters, and Davenport were not able to attack her 2nd serve that often, most times Graf was able to start rallies in neutral, whereas vs most women those 4 are hitting countless clean winners off the 2nd serve. That alone speaks to Graf having one of the best 2nd serves, hardly anyone was able to truly attack it more than once in awhile. Last edited by grafselesfan : 10-02-2009 at 06:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| grafselesfan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grafselesfan |
|
|
#7 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 483
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 715
|
|
|
|
|
| Darth_Timmaayyy!! |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Darth_Timmaayyy!! |
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,594
|
|
|
|
|
| grafselesfan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grafselesfan |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,512
|
Quote:
__________________
"I thank the Lord Jesus Christ, because without Him, I am nothing." -- Michael Chang after beating Stefan Edberg to win the 1989 French Open |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 973
|
Quote:
Well, this is what I know. From 1988 to 1992, Steffi primarily hit a slice second serve. She fully pronated, however, even on her slice serve; so it had some kick on it. Look on youtube for the clips from the 1988 Wimbledon Final. You can see for yourself. (I hope to have some higher quality clips from this match soon. On one of them, I'll point out how she fully pronates even on her slice serve.) By 1996, Steffi was hitting both topspin and slice second serves. Here's two topspin second serves from 1996: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYs0Y7OJ8Dc http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30mqLLUoSJw In the clip of the first one, you can see the service motion in slow-mo. The position of her forearm at the end of the motion clues you into what she is trying to do with the ball. In the second clip, it's the trajectory and the bounce of the ball that clues you into the type of serve it is. I think Steffi's service motion is more innovative than Serena's. I showed you Steffi's in slow motion. Here's Serena's: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoNhZtPO5S4. Both very good motions, but I like how Steffi keeps her right shoulder up longer, the effect of such extreme pronation. You'll see on the follow-through how Serena's arm falls naturally to her left and with it her shoulder. That's very old school. On the other hand, Steffi's motion is more like what you see from today's male players. At hi-techtennis.com, there's a visual analysis of Djokovic's topspin serve which could be an analysis of Steffi's topspin serve. It is a subscription site. But, go to this thread http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=267. On the second page of this thread, second to last post, you'll find a link to that visual analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,594
|
|
|
|
|
| grafselesfan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by grafselesfan |
|
|
#13 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,964
|
Isn't Venus's serve harder and faster than Serena's?
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 1,333
|
Possibly when at its best (don't think there's much in it) but Serena's serve is much more consistent than Venus's. Serena can usually rely on her serve to get her out of sticky situations whereas Venus's is more likely to break down under pressure.
|
|
|
|
| Lionheart392 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lionheart392 |
|
|
#15 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,964
|
Ahh. Makes sense. OK, thanks.
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|