|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#341 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,778
|
Quote:
2) An overgrip is enough to counterbalance. But counterbalancing is to obtain the headlight balance you want. An overgrip can be part of the weight used to obtain that balance, but sometimes it won't be enough.
__________________
[K]Six.One Tour (3) 367.5 grams 31.7 cm balance. Mains: Babolat/Wilson Natural Gut @ 49 lbs // Crosses: Luxilon Alu Power Rough @ 46 lbs |
|
|
|
|
| xFullCourtTenniSx |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by xFullCourtTenniSx |
|
|
#342 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 517
|
hi X (aka Dr. Lead Tape)
as mentioned before, i have finally got my other FXP Prestige MP back and i have done a few measurements for you to give me advice on how to match them (as closely as possible... please) so here they are: FXP Prestige MP 1 (main racquet): Weight - 356g Head balance - 31.5cm Current Lead tape - 4 x 4" of 1/2" width tapes at 3 and 9 oclock (my previous attempt before #2 arrived, outside the CAP) String - Babolat Attraction Power 16 @ 60lb (eventually this will have Bab Addition 17 on it) Grip - leather & tourna grip (matched) Dampener - Wilson smilie FXP Prestige MP 2 (newly acquired USED Weight - 360g Head balance - 32.75cm Current Lead tape - 2 x 6" of 1/2" width tapes at 12 oclock (under the CAP, came with the racquet) String - Babolat Addition 17 @ 60lb (they dont have 16 in the UK) Grip - leather & tourna grip (matched) Dampener - Wilson smilie now, the tricky bits is - i much prefer the #2 setup, it just feels more solid and has a better plow through for me and enjoyed playing with it much more. so..... i hope there is sufficient info. can you please advise me on how to match these 2 racquets as closely as possible, thanks very much PS - is head balance 32.75cm more head heavey than 31.5cm? because #2 is more head heavy than #1 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#343 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 517
|
ttt...
hope X isnt on holdiays..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#344 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 553
|
I play with an Ozone Tour, and I'm thinking about adding like 5g on the upper half of the handle (where the left hand holds it), no more and nowhere else. What effects should it produce? Is it enough to improve stability, power or anything? Will it just spoil my strokes? Or is it too little weight to make any difference?
__________________
In the end, the only thing a new racquet will do for you is make you suck in a different way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#345 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 1,276
|
I have a pretty stupid newbie question. Does the glue on lead tape dry and permanently stick to the racket?
__________________
Head Youtek Prestige Pro strung RIP 17 49lb Head leather/Babolat VS. TGK 238.4 NXT17 55lbs . Pro Stock Radical MP with MT @ 55 FS or FT. |
|
|
|
|
|
#346 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,544
|
No, no problems removing it.
__________________
3 Matched Pure Drive 2012, SW 324, 2pts HL Nat Gut Can you say "Surgical Precision!" Eagnas 910 stringer. Wise tension head ERT 300 |
|
|
|
|
|
#347 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 949
|
Quote:
As a follow-up to your responses, I am a 4.0-4.5 all courter. Years ago I was a 5.0 aggressive baseline. I switched to the youtek rad mp w/ babolat tonic 16 strung at 56 in mid september from the aerogel 300. I was playing fine with it and felt it had better touch/feel but had trouble against players at my level or above who hit a heavy ball. I particularly have had issues with the return of serve but was serving well with it. As a result, I experimented with lead and settled on 3 grams of lead at 3 and 9 and another 3 under the top of the handle. However, I was not entirely happy with it. Resulting in total weight of 11.7 ounces. On Thursday night, I was the only guy at my drill and play lesson so I hit with the pro one on one. I was a little slow getting around on the ball with my leaded up Radical against him and still got pushed around a bit. The pro was demoing the Youtek Prestige MP. He let me hit with the Youtek and I was much more consistent on my groundies against him. My balls didn't land short and I was able to maintain sustained rallies although I had to work a bit harder to generate pace. It felt more natural. My volleys were also very consistent, still had putaway power and I reacted faster at net. It also felt more natural. On serves, I did not generate as much pop but again was more consistent. Overheads were easier to get in position and were also more consistent but din't have the same oomph. I asked him to give me some very soft balls because that is where I sometimes have trouble and I couldn't hit them out but had enough pace. The pro's comments to me were that it was by far the most consistent and best I had ever hit. He felt that the stick was more suited to me than the RAD because I was extremely consistent and he felt the loss of power was negligible although I had to work hard to generate pace and keep up with him. Of course, I was using cheap demo synthetic string. The pro said that I should keep in mind that the difference in string is why the stick felt stiffer and the Prestige would have more pop and be much easier on my arm if I was using my Tonic. He stated that although I am in my late 40s, I have a long swing and so the Prestige MP would still be better for me. I should point out when I went back to hitting w/ the Rad during the same session, although I generated more pop, I felt less in control and it was less stable. The Radical with lead was almost the same weight as the Prestige. What are your thoughts regarding making the switch? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#348 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 517
|
Dr Lead Tape!!!!
WHERE ARE YOU MATE?!? need your help... please! |
|
|
|
|
|
#349 |
|
decades
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Is there a way to measure HL or HH balance of a racket without buying something? thanks.
|
|
| decades |
|
|
#350 | |
|
decades
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
| decades |
|
|
#351 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
Next find the midpoint of your racquet. For a normal 27 inch racquet it would be at 13 1/2 inches. Make a mark. For every 1/8th of an inch the balance point is from the midpoint of the racquet, it equals 1 point HH (if the balance point is closer to the head) or HL (if the balance point is closer to the handle). For example - if your balance point is at 13 inches on the handle side (and on a standard 27 inch racquet), it would be considered 4 points head light as the balance point is 1/2 inch or (4/8 inch) from the midpoint. |
|
|
|
|
| HitItHarder |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by HitItHarder |
|
|
#352 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,296
|
i recently discovered this post and want to give a hearty thank you to the lead doctor for all the time and effort spent educating the populace. i've been using lead for quite some time but doing so ignorantly. this changes everything.
its time to revisit all of the configurations on my racquets.
__________________
(3)Volkl PB 10 Mid 375gm 360sw 12gm@3&9 10gm@handle 9pt HL, 1HBH 3.5ntrp |
|
|
|
| thebuffman |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by thebuffman |
|
|
#353 | |
|
decades
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
|
| decades |
|
|
#354 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
|
i am a 5.0 age group 55's tournament player. serve and volley, lob,slice old school placement with moderate arm problems.i recently stared using Titan Natural Gut 50lbs mains and stiff multi 52lbs in crosses which has helped..i just started trying to customize after reading this thread..i use a WILSON 5.3 Mid Plus Hammer 95 hyper carbon ..i wrapped horizontally14g lead tape spread 4 inches starting at bottom base of grip (under) and another 3 g in rubber bands 7 inches above grip and it pretty much balanced this head heavy Hammer..It played pretty good after that.. But today i added 5g at 3 and 5g at 9..i went to hit against the wall and it felt heavy but i was still hitting my serve harder which is a huge part of my game..I will hit for real tomorrow and report back..I would aprreciate any advice on anywhere else i can make improvements..here are my specs
Technical Specifications Length 27.5 inches 70 centimeters Head Size 95 square inches 613 square centimeters Weight 10 ounces 284 grams Balance Point 14.25 inches 36 centimeters 4 pts Head Heavy Shaft Width 23mm Head / 23 mm Shaft Composition Graphite & Hyper Carbon Babolat RDC Ratings Score Grade Flex Rating 75 Range: 0-100 Swing Weight 326 Range: 200-400 Manueverability 75 A |
|
|
|
|
|
#355 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#356 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#357 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,296
|
comeback, the problem with your setup, and according to what lead doctor noted, is that head heavy racquets are very difficult to customize. here is why. customization of the racquet generally is to increase the swing weight of the racquet significantly from a sw1 category to a sw2 category. also increasing stability on off center hits can be another reason for mods. these are popular reasons to mod. in order then to increase swingweight, power & plow through, the only significant placement of lead will be in the hoop of the racquet. adding the lead to the throat will have marginal gains, at best, to the desired attribute gains of a customized racquet.
for those reasons, the ideal racquet specs for a customization candidate is an extremely head light one. with a head heavy racquet, you are more or less sort of stuck with the swingweight the racquet was manufactured at. adding anymore lead to the hoop will probably destroy the would be carrier's arm. alternatively, adding weight to the handle will only achieve two things: increased overall racquet weight & shift toward more head lightness. adding weight to the handle will not add any noticeable increase in swingweight, plow through, or power at the contact spot. if i were you, i would probably go more more maneuverability than trying to increase swing weight. this would mean adding weight to the butt cap area. this way you wouldn't have to use as much lead as you are using now in order to make the racquet a little more head light. as an example go to this link and plug in these numbers: length - 27in weight - 11oz balance - 12.25in (10pts HL) swing weight - 330 you should see approx power of 41 and plow thru of 27 now lets mod it. down at the lower portion input: length - 21 in weight - 15g we see that adding 15 total grams at 3&9 position increase the swingweight 8.5% increases power 7% and the plow 16.4%. HOWEVER the once 10pt HL balance is now dropped significantly to below 7pts HL. this though is not the point of my example. here is what i am getting to and thanks for bearing with me. now in order to regain our preferred balance, we add weight into the handle. one of the best places to do it for this depolarized setup is to add it at 7in from the buttcap. adding here allows us to significantly affect balance while also adding active weight which will still make small increases to our concentric power zone. if we added lead really low on the handle and further away from the power zone (place where we contact the ball - the only place on the racquet that really matters) we no longer add active weight or weight that will impute any energy to the ball. so on the 2nd customization line lets add: length - 7in weight - 10gm notice the changes? the only significant changes that took place after adding a whopping 10gm to the handle was reflected in the overall weight of the racquet and the balance. swingweight changed minimally from 8.5% to 8.7%, a change of 0.2%. plow thru and power at the point of ball contact saw an affect of nil. so a racquet that is already significantly head heavy is a tough customer to customize if your objective is to add swingweight or to depolarize it. polarizing the racquet might be a better way to go, i am not sure. but here you would place small amounts of lead at both ends of the stick. a polarized racquet though does not give the same stability as a depolarized setup. it does however help to increase attributes of the racquet without altering its weight too significantly.
__________________
(3)Volkl PB 10 Mid 375gm 360sw 12gm@3&9 10gm@handle 9pt HL, 1HBH 3.5ntrp |
|
|
|
| thebuffman |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by thebuffman |
|
|
#358 | |
|
Rookie
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Roger No.1 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Roger No.1 |
|
|
#359 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 346
|
wow this is a great thread lots to read and learn! thanks guys
|
|
|
|
|
|
#360 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: I'll never buy from TW until I get unbanned. Tennis Nuts FTW.
Posts: 1,251
|
Yeah, great thread! Thanks for posting!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|