|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,390
|
Quote:
I'm asking for other matches between other players where the challenger had a huge leading h2h score against the number #1 ranked player in a slam final. If you see this as a thread about Nadal-Federer then your interpretation isn't what I intended.
__________________
Fed 2010: Federer aged 28 16 Slams(inc. career slam) vs Sampras aged 28 14 Slams(no FO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,390
|
That was their first meeting on grass so Graf didn't have a huge leading h2h over Seles on the surface so the match wasn't what I was asking for.
__________________
Fed 2010: Federer aged 28 16 Slams(inc. career slam) vs Sampras aged 28 14 Slams(no FO) |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 813
|
Quote:
So, just what are you looking for? An exact replication of the Federer and Nadal situation? There is no historical precedence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,390
|
Quote:
John the #1 in the world plays Bob in a hard court slam final. Bob has a huge 12-1 h2h score over John on hard courts. If Bob was losing 12-1 in the h2h then it wouldn't count.
__________________
Fed 2010: Federer aged 28 16 Slams(inc. career slam) vs Sampras aged 28 14 Slams(no FO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,390
|
Quote:
My source is only partially sorted http://www.sonyericssonwtatour.com/h...4~2718,00.html What am I looking for? Anything of format #1 player in slam final who has a big losing h2h score with the challenger. Historical precedence? Anything close like 1-5 or more. 1 win for the #1 and 5 for the challenger.
__________________
Fed 2010: Federer aged 28 16 Slams(inc. career slam) vs Sampras aged 28 14 Slams(no FO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Basel/Switzerland
Posts: 1,678
|
there haven't been too many slam finals with the #1 in it and the challenger winning anyway...
you won't find more than 10-15 player pairs I think. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,502
|
roddick vs fed wimby final in 04 was a-rod number one then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,858
|
|
|
|
|
| dropshot winner |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by dropshot winner |
|
|
#31 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,588
|
The most lopsided score against a world #1 in slam final was Fed at the 2008 FO final.
|
|
|
|
| TheNatural |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TheNatural |
|
|
#32 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,624
|
The match that springs to mind is Sampras' hammering of Agassi at Wimbledon 99. It wasn't as close as the score indicated.
|
|
|
|
| Datacipher |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Datacipher |
|
|
#33 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,315
|
Quote:
Sanchez was 4-11 on clay entering the FO 95 final against Graf and 23 vs. 25 in age. Sanchez lost in three sets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,390
|
If Sanchez was number #1 before the match then you understand the question.
__________________
Fed 2010: Federer aged 28 16 Slams(inc. career slam) vs Sampras aged 28 14 Slams(no FO) |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,503
|
Mats Wilander was 1-4 against Ivan Lendl on hardcourts, and 7-15 in their overall H2H, when he beat Lendl in the 1988 US Open final.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|