|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Leave your opinions on the 2 , insights , and which one you prefer
Thanks in advance. I am deciding between the 2. I am trying out 17 because I think I need some more zip on my shots and I can sacrifice durability because I am not a string popper. Are they very different in feel? Again, thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 228
|
I prefer a thinner string so i recomend the 17 the 17 will get slightly more power. If you want more power i suggest a multifilament a couple that have good power include: x one biphase, xcel power.
__________________
Babolat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,200
|
PHT is one of the most uncomfortable polys out there, so if you must, go thinner.
__________________
(4) Head Microgel Extreme MP 325g unstrung Babolat Star 2 *PRO'S PRO STRINGS-Exclusive Distributor in U.S. and Canada* |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Quote:
I am in the midst of trying the thinner 17 ... I mean it won't hurt, I'm looking for more comfort and power anyways while still trying to keep its stiff attribute intact. Hopefully I'll make the right move and buying a reel of the 17 before even getting a pack of it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,200
|
If comfort is important to you, there are many other polys which are better. After they tried my suggestions, none of my customers miss PHT at all.
__________________
(4) Head Microgel Extreme MP 325g unstrung Babolat Star 2 *PRO'S PRO STRINGS-Exclusive Distributor in U.S. and Canada* |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Give it a try. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|