• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Why Laver didnt win a slam after 1969?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 12 of 12 « First < 21011 12
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2012, 01:08 PM   #221
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustard View Post
David Bowie arrived with Space Oddity
Mets and Jets won the big titles
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian
kiki is online now   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 10-07-2012, 01:28 PM   #222
Limpinhitter
Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,289
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Mets and Jets won the big titles
Mario Andretti became immortal.
Limpinhitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Limpinhitter
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Limpinhitter
Old 10-14-2012, 08:36 PM   #223
krosero
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
Default

Laver had some wrist problems that contributed to his five-set loss at the '68 USO to Cliff Drysdale. Don't know whether he still had these problems in the 70s, but here's a report on the Drysdale match, from the New York Times.

Laver lost 4-6, 6-4, 3-6, 6-1, 6-1 in the R16.
Yesterday, Laver’s normally strong serve deserted him. He faulted 79 of 139 first serves, a 43 per cent first-service ratio and hardly a statistic worthy of a Wimbledon champion.....

Drysdale’s chances improved as Laver’s first serve deteriorated. In the first three sets, he managed 43 of 93 first serves. But in the fourth set, he missed 14 of 18 and in the fifth set 15 of 28....

His 14th double-fault of the match came at deuce in the final game. Drysdale won the match with a forehand return of service placement down the line.

“My serve was the shot that let me down the whole tournament,” said Laver, who has lost four straight tournaments since returning from a vacation ordered because of persistent wrist problems. “If your confidence lets you down, you can’t do much of anything.”

Laver refused to use his ailing wrist as an alibi. But friends close to the red-haired Aussi said he has been bothered by the wrist and that complications arising from a match on Monday with Pancho Segura forced Laver to change his service grip against Drysdale.

Drysdale, 27 years old, beat Laver with consistency. Using an aluminum racquet he tried for the first time only five days ago, the South African drilled his two-handed backhand – or left-handed forehand, whichever you prefer – and concentrated on baseline play. It was an unusual strategy in an era of serve-and-volley tactics.
krosero is offline   Reply With Quote
krosero
View Public Profile
Visit krosero's homepage!
Find More Posts by krosero
Old 10-14-2012, 11:20 PM   #224
urban
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,735
Default

Laver had taken a fall on his wrist in the French Pro one week after Wimbledon, and he had to set out out for a while. The wrist injury put more strain on his elbow, so he got a sort of tennis elbow since 1969, which he handled with ice and heat.
urban is offline   Reply With Quote
urban
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by urban
Old 10-15-2012, 05:02 PM   #225
Moose Malloy
Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,468
Default

Quote:
Yesterday, Laver’s normally strong serve deserted him. He faulted 79 of 139 first serves, a 43 per cent first-service ratio and hardly a statistic worthy of a Wimbledon champion.....

Drysdale’s chances improved as Laver’s first serve deteriorated. In the first three sets, he managed 43 of 93 first serves. But in the fourth set, he missed 14 of 18 and in the fifth set 15 of 28....

His 14th double-fault of the match came at deuce in the final game
nice find.
43% & 14 df's, wow
Moose Malloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Moose Malloy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Moose Malloy
Old 10-15-2012, 10:27 PM   #226
krosero
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose Malloy View Post
nice find.
43% & 14 df's, wow
Yes you know when Laver loses the last two sets of a five-setter 6-1 and 6-1, something is off.

It's comparable to his five-setter against Rosewall at the 1970 Dunlop. In that match he served 16 double-faults in 158 service points.

But Laver won that one, partly because he made 51% of his first serves.
krosero is offline   Reply With Quote
krosero
View Public Profile
Visit krosero's homepage!
Find More Posts by krosero
Reply
Page 12 of 12 « First < 21011 12

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Why Laver didnt win a slam after 1969?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse