|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 499
|
...and he decided not to hit it (windy), and as he ducked, the ball hit him on the way down...
Decision? Is that like me getting hit on the fly? Is that considered 'in play', or? Just curious, as I beat him anyway, but was just wondering about this. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 5,870
|
he gets first serve by the rules, is that what the decision was?
__________________
皆 けちやんか… |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 499
|
Never questioned it. I was just kind of curious that he threw the ball in the air, and it bounced off his back on the way down.
And that made me wonder if that was considered an 'in play' type of scenario? I didn't care. I'm never going to call anything like that save blatant cheating (and I'm always like if I can't make an instant decision on a line call, then it's good, and if not 100% certain it's out, then it's good). It just made me wonder what a decision would have been if the roving ump' had seen it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,707
|
Nope. As long as you don't swing at it the ball can touch you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 499
|
Cool. Thanks. I'd never seen it happen, so I was just wondering....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
woodrow1029
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It would be the same as if he were to just catch it on the racket or in his hand. As long as he doesn't make an attempt to hit the serve, it's not a fault.
However, if he swung and missed completely, it would be a fault. |
|
| woodrow1029 |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|