|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,491
|
On my travels yesterday, I found and purchased what I believe could be a very, very early Prince racquet. It looks like a Classic 110, but has four holes in the green nylon throatpiece, instead of the three holes of the newer versions of Classic and Classic 2. In fact, there is no model name stickers or moldings on the frame whatsoever, nothing identifying "Classic" – only a small sticker inset in the extruded aluminum channel slot of the frame, denoting the grip size of 4-5/8” (and not the typical 1980’s Prince long rectangular grip size sticker listing all the patent numbers and places). Adjacent to the small sticker in the tube stock indent, there is a neatly hand-engraved serial number, 921. The butt cap is a generic-looking black one, with round inset for a sticker, but no other identifying marks (no sticker on this specimen, either). Grip is what looks to be the original leather one. The nylon throatpiece also seems to be held in place by two small Phillips-headed screws (one on each side), and the green plastic grommet going around the head has little nubs molded in it around its outer periphery, near the string holes. FWIW, it’s strung with some really old natural gut. And apart from being dusty and dirty, it’s in pretty good condition for a racquet that could potentially be 37 years old (1976?).
Could this be the 921st Prince frame ever built, part of the original batch of Prince racquets (before the Pro, Graphite, and Woodie were introduced, necessitating the “Classic” name for the basic silver and green aluminum model)?
__________________
Psalm 100:4 Last edited by retrowagen : 01-04-2013 at 12:54 PM. |
|
|
|
| retrowagen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by retrowagen |
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 842
|
PICS....Please?
__________________
2x MAX 200G PRO, Nat.Gut/Ferry Force Super Touch at 58 lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,180
|
Mine is the same as yours and is numbered 983. The matching headcover incidentally is not labelled Classic, merely Prince (with the transparent 'I' shooting a ball, mimicking its ball machine). I agree it may be part of the original batch before the Classic moniker was added.
__________________
Before TW: POG Mid user for over 20 years After TW: confirmed racketholic |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,750
|
You have described the model I saw in 1977, before the Pro was released.
__________________
GAMMA 4000 + WISE | PRINCE SPEEDPORT GOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Houston / Perpignan
Posts: 2,565
|
I don't believe Prince started using the "classic" label until after 1979 or 1980.......in all the shops at that time we had the Prince, Prince Pro and the Prince Graphite.......it was when the Woodie and all the mid size frames started hitting the stores that the classic label was used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,309
|
Quote:
__________________
Trustworthy - Loyal - Helpful - Friendly - Courteous - Kind - Obedient - Cheerful - Thrifty - Brave - Clean - Reverent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,385
|
I think Prince started using the Classic name in 1980.
Here is a ad form 1980. http://www.80s-tennis.com/pages/prince-racquets_80.html
__________________
Babolat ruined VS Gut and Tonic Gut with BT7. Why change a gut string that had been perfect for 135 years? It's now overpriced garbage. Last edited by vsbabolat : 01-06-2013 at 05:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,491
|
Right! Photos here:
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Psalm 100:4 |
|
|
|
| retrowagen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by retrowagen |
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,047
|
these pics bring back fond memories. my first real racquet was a prince classic 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2012
Location: The Land Down Under
Posts: 116
|
Same here. I had one of these back in the early 80s. The green plastic had cracked and I gave it away about 10 years ago. Now that my kids are playing I am really sorry I got rid of it and my first racquet (Dunlop wooden!) and the Frank Sedgman aluminium that came between the two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,491
|
Was looking at more old racquets this last week, and noticed something odd. I was looking over an original Head Edge aluminum midsize, and lo and behold, its tube cross-section is the same as the original Prince in my possession. It also has a hand-engraved serial number of the same size and number style, engraved in the same exact spot as on the Prince (in the case of the Edge, it was "9211." It also had the same exact type of grip size sticker (located in the same exact spot as on the Prince), and had the same exact pallet and butt cap as the early Prince. The method and hardware for the throat fastening to the tube frame was identical, too.
Looks like there is rather more in common than meets the eye with Howard Head's old and newer products back in 1976!
__________________
Psalm 100:4 |
|
|
|
| retrowagen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by retrowagen |
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,047
|
^^ good eye! probably made in the same factory initially before Prince went to Taiwan to get their frames made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,385
|
^
If it was it would have been the Boulder factory.
__________________
Babolat ruined VS Gut and Tonic Gut with BT7. Why change a gut string that had been perfect for 135 years? It's now overpriced garbage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,491
|
Given the evidence, that was my semi-educated best guess...
__________________
Psalm 100:4 |
|
|
|
| retrowagen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by retrowagen |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|