• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Stringing Techniques / Stringing Machines
Reload this Page Question re: modern string tensions / strings
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2010, 04:19 AM   #1
Bobby Jr
Hall Of Fame
 
Bobby Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,543
Default Question re: modern string tensions / strings

I have played with the Wilson PS85 since god knows when and used to string them at 62-63 lbs with whatever was the normal shop reel string in the 90s.

Since I started playing again after a very long break I've been getting them strung at 60 lbs using Prince Synthetic Gut Multi 16 (basically because it was about half way in the range of available strings in the shop). I got one strung at 58 and it was clearly too soft almost immediately.

My query is: I keep seeing pro tensions for Federer etc mentioned on the boards and they're always in the mid 50s or even lower. I couldn't even play with my racquets strung that loose... Do they use strings that 'play' fundamentally tighter compared to conventional 'shop reel' strings? Or has the trend been to string looser since the 90s? I just cant see how guys using 100sq/inch heads could play with such low tensions?

Also - Is using different strings for the mains/crosses worth trying for X reason (feel/durability/maintaining tension)?

Also 2 - Any recommendations for strings which might be worth trying? I am not a major string breaker but have a fast swing use quite heavy racquets.

Thanks for any tips/comments on this.

(Ironically, I used to string my own while working at a club for many years - but the last time was in about 1997. It's quite odd letting someone else string my sticks but I made sure at least it's the same person and machine each time so I can get a better picture)
__________________
Original Pro Staff 85, leaded to 370g, hybrid poly/syn gut set-up, 48-52-ish lbs.

Last edited by Bobby Jr : 11-05-2010 at 04:40 AM.
Bobby Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Bobby Jr
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Bobby Jr
Old 11-05-2010, 04:53 AM   #2
Irvin
Legend
 
Irvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
Default

Most of the pros are playing with lower tensions because they are using poly strings. I do not think poly strings are for you though as you are not a string breaker.

If I were you I would try some different strings and see how they feel to you.

Irvin
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it'
Irvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Irvin
View Public Profile
Visit Irvin's homepage!
Find More Posts by Irvin
Old 11-05-2010, 04:58 AM   #3
Bobby Jr
Hall Of Fame
 
Bobby Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,543
Default

OK. That's good info... Thanks. So if I strung at 60 with a multi that would be equivalent to using poly at 5lbs less?

Or is the gap more than that (or vary noticeably between brands as well)?

Cheers.
__________________
Original Pro Staff 85, leaded to 370g, hybrid poly/syn gut set-up, 48-52-ish lbs.
Bobby Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Bobby Jr
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Bobby Jr
Old 11-05-2010, 05:01 AM   #4
Irvin
Legend
 
Irvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
Default

No poly at any tension will be the equivalent of a multi and any tension.

Irvin
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it'
Irvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Irvin
View Public Profile
Visit Irvin's homepage!
Find More Posts by Irvin
Old 11-05-2010, 05:24 AM   #5
joe sch
Hall Of Fame
 
joe sch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hotel CA
Posts: 4,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irvin View Post
Most of the pros are playing with lower tensions because they are using poly strings. I do not think poly strings are for you though as you are not a string breaker.

If I were you I would try some different strings and see how they feel to you.

Irvin
Players are now playing poly and copoly strings for the unsurpassed control and "hit-ability", not because they were string breakers. They are generally for big hitters, longer swings, players that want to take big cuts and keep the ball in play. They should be played at 5..10% less than the tension one played syn gut, and can also be played at even lower tensions for great control and less arm impact.
joe sch is offline   Reply With Quote
joe sch
View Public Profile
Visit joe sch's homepage!
Find More Posts by joe sch
Old 11-05-2010, 05:49 AM   #6
Irvin
Legend
 
Irvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe sch View Post
Players are now playing poly and copoly strings for the unsurpassed control and "hit-ability", not because they were string breakers...
I don't believe that. Most people play poly because it's the in thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe sch View Post
...They are generally for big hitters, longer swings, players that want to take big cuts and keep the ball in play...
Those are good reasons to play poly

Quote:
Originally Posted by joe sch View Post
...They should be played at 5..10% less than the tension one played syn gut, and can also be played at even lower tensions for great control and less arm impact.
Lowering the tension will decrease arm impact but not so sure it will improve control. Poly is not going to have less arm impact than multis.

Irvin
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it'
Irvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Irvin
View Public Profile
Visit Irvin's homepage!
Find More Posts by Irvin
Old 11-05-2010, 08:45 AM   #7
airman88
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 557
Default

I have to agree with Joe Sch to some degree. Most newer polys are not really that great for durability, especially with people playing in thin gauges. Th playing characteristics are very different and unique, as Irvin has said, and some people just can't play without that. I personally only play with the feel of full bed polys.

Yes but to answer the question, the different tensions are due to the type of string. And also some people just play with soft, mushy strings and very short swings, but I don't get how they do it either.
__________________
(2) Dunlop Aerogel 200 (~345 g)- Genesis Typhoon (Gray) Full Bed (55/56.5)
airman88 is offline   Reply With Quote
airman88
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by airman88
Old 11-05-2010, 11:32 AM   #8
Irvin
Legend
 
Irvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,974
Default

^^ I agree.

Irvin
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it'
Irvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Irvin
View Public Profile
Visit Irvin's homepage!
Find More Posts by Irvin
Old 11-05-2010, 06:46 PM   #9
Bobby Jr
Hall Of Fame
 
Bobby Jr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,543
Default

Thanks Irvin, Joe and airman88.

That makes some more sense to me now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe sch View Post
Players are now playing poly and copoly strings for the unsurpassed control and "hit-ability", not because they were string breakers. They are generally for big hitters, longer swings, players that want to take big cuts and keep the ball in play.
Can you just let me know about copoly? I can't find it discussed it in the TT strings guide.

Also - I do take big cuts at the ball and would like to be able to get more spin. Would a copoly be good for that but with the 'penalty' of perhaps lesser feel? (FYI, I don't have arm troubles in case that was a consideration)

I am happy to try stuff which breaks more often if the playing is better - spin especially. OR, would I really be better first off just trying a 17 gauge version of the string I'm already using? (don't want to overcomplicate life just yet )

Cheers for the comments thus far anyway.
__________________
Original Pro Staff 85, leaded to 370g, hybrid poly/syn gut set-up, 48-52-ish lbs.
Bobby Jr is offline   Reply With Quote
Bobby Jr
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Bobby Jr
Old 11-05-2010, 07:40 PM   #10
nguyen320
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Jr View Post
Thanks Irvin, Joe and airman88.

That makes some more sense to me now.

Can you just let me know about copoly? I can't find it discussed it in the TT strings guide.

Also - I do take big cuts at the ball and would like to be able to get more spin. Would a copoly be good for that but with the 'penalty' of perhaps lesser feel? (FYI, I don't have arm troubles in case that was a consideration)

I am happy to try stuff which breaks more often if the playing is better - spin especially. OR, would I really be better first off just trying a 17 gauge version of the string I'm already using? (don't want to overcomplicate life just yet )

Cheers for the comments thus far anyway.
Basically the same thing.. My thoughts on poly is that it is GREAT for the first few hours then it loses tension. that is why you see them switching racquets so often because if they didnt they would lose control. I have switched from poly to a synthetic guy b/c I cant afford to switch strings every 7 hours. My thought on the low tensions is because (for me and some others will support this thought too, however it has not been "proven") polys seem to have more spin potential with lower tensions which is important at the pro level. I don't view polys as a "control" string because of its tension loss over the long run but when fresh off the stringer it feels great, great spin, great control, and good power. So my sugguestion is don't use a poly unless you can afford to pay for a new stringjob every week or two or you don't really care about the tension.. Although most polys are very durable (they will last up to months for some people), they don't seem to play as well after a week or so.
nguyen320 is offline   Reply With Quote
nguyen320
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by nguyen320
Old 11-05-2010, 08:16 PM   #11
rufusbgood
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 698
Default

Bobby,

Here's what I suggest. Next time you need new strings forget PSG Multi. Get your racquet strung with a full bed of Luxilon Alu Fluoro and drop the tension to somewhere between 45-50 lbs on a constant pull machine.

There are several reasons why Luxilon is as popular as it is. Other posters have mentioned control, durability, etc. What they haven't mentioned is this: You don't have to string it tight to keep the strings from moving around. This is critical in my opinion. This has allowed tour level players to drop tensions into the 30 and 40 lbs region. Because when the strings are staying in position you get consistent shot placement. And I think you will find that your shots feel more "solid" when you hit with Luxilon.
rufusbgood is offline   Reply With Quote
rufusbgood
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by rufusbgood
Old 11-05-2010, 08:49 PM   #12
airman88
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 557
Default

Or try Signum pro or Genesis and it'll last and not lose tension.
__________________
(2) Dunlop Aerogel 200 (~345 g)- Genesis Typhoon (Gray) Full Bed (55/56.5)
airman88 is offline   Reply With Quote
airman88
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by airman88
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Stringing Techniques / Stringing Machines
Reload this Page Question re: modern string tensions / strings

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:39 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse