• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Connors 60 years !
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2011, 04:44 AM   #21
bigjimbofan
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 72
Default

I watched the Champions Series match vs Courier last night on Fox Sports Ohio and thought Jimmy looked pretty good for a 60year old.It was a very competitive match that could have gone either way and it didn't appear that Courier was just dogging it to make the score closer.It was good to see Jimmy on the court again.
bigjimbofan is offline   Reply With Quote
bigjimbofan
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by bigjimbofan
Old 11-10-2011, 02:52 PM   #22
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Limpinhitter View Post
I don't know who does his hair, but, that's a very natural looking color.

PS: Still has a great return game!
His perm?? it ain´t nothing compared to Roscoe´s perm ( which he may have changed 20 years over the lat 5 years, anyhow¡¡¡)
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 11-10-2011, 02:55 PM   #23
kiki
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datacipher View Post
Geez. Yeah...I don't even know what to say to ignorance like this anymore....been through it so many times. Drug testing! LOL! Unicorn testing? As good ol' Brock Lesnar says when asked (though he absolutely refuses to say he HASN'T taken drugs...good on 'em): I've been tested hundreds of times in college, wwe, ufc...I've never TESTED positive.

Of course...when Muster played, tests didn't even exist for EPO, drug of choice for claycourters...but WTH! Let's just pretend it's a valid argument point K??? WHEEE!!! OFF TO FAIRLY LAND FOR ALL OF US GUYS!!!!!!!!! YSAOOOAYEWEEEWOOOOOOOO!!!!
And who gives a **** about Muster?? he is hardly noticed...just one major, like Gomez ( who beat Agassi, not Chang¡¡¡)
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70´s and 80´s" ABMK, the historian
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote
kiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kiki
Old 11-10-2011, 04:38 PM   #24
Mustard
G.O.A.T.
 
Mustard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
And who gives a **** about Muster?? he is hardly noticed...just one major, like Gomez ( who beat Agassi, not Chang¡¡¡)
Hardly noticed? Muster? He was everywhere on the clay scene in the mid-1990s. He won 44 tournaments after all, with plenty of epic matches, and there was usually controversy about how a player would be wound up by Muster's on-court demeanour, and then came insinuations and accusations about drugs when he started to win a load of clay-court matches in a row (many matches of which Muster won from MPs down), even though they didn't have a shred of evidence.
Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
Mustard
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mustard
Old 11-11-2011, 12:51 AM   #25
Datacipher
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
And who gives a **** about Muster?? he is hardly noticed...just one major, like Gomez ( who beat Agassi, not Chang¡¡¡)
True, he was a nobody in terms of greatness. He was certainly a character....one of the absolute most hated men on the tour....he lived off the legend of his "accident", but also used it to shy away from ever growing beyond a 1 surface pony (at least I, and some others, like Mcenroe think so!). He also grew a legend of "toughness" that was not exactly warranted, considering he gave up in a number off matches off clay, and even on clay, his domination only lasted a very short time. There was of course the controversy of his disingenous claims to #1 as well!

He probably gets about the attention he deserves now. I liked Muster quite a bit, (always regretted that he never owned up to becoming the hard court player he had the potential to be), but you certainly don't see me chattering away about him!
Datacipher is offline   Reply With Quote
Datacipher
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Datacipher
Old 11-11-2011, 07:01 AM   #26
Mustard
G.O.A.T.
 
Mustard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datacipher View Post
always regretted that he never owned up to becoming the hard court player he had the potential to be
We can blame the 1989 incident for that, which limited the amount of matches he could play on hardcourt. Still, winning some hardcourt tournaments like Miami and Dubai, getting to 2 Australian Open semi finals and 3 US Open quarter finals, is still rather good. Without the 1989 incident, who knows how his career would have turned out.
Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
Mustard
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mustard
Old 11-11-2011, 10:59 AM   #27
Datacipher
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustard View Post
We can blame the 1989 incident for that, .
He spent his whole career using that tired excuse. Sorry....don't buy it! He was more than healthy and able to play. Fact is, he was a prissy when it came to truly making a full effort on other surfaces....he liked to play in his safe zone on clay. One need only look at the polarized difference between Nadal's attitude towards Wimbledon and Muster's to see the difference between a real champ and a pretender.

I will say this, at least he put in a helluva lot more effort on other surfaces than Bruguera. Bruguera, probably had more potential than Muster, but was a total flake out. Ask Mcenroe about him as well!
Datacipher is offline   Reply With Quote
Datacipher
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Datacipher
Old 11-11-2011, 11:15 AM   #28
Mustard
G.O.A.T.
 
Mustard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datacipher View Post
He spent his whole career using that tired excuse. Sorry....don't buy it! He was more than healthy and able to play.
Are you saying it was no factor? Muster can't even fully bend his left leg to this day.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Datacipher View Post
Fact is, he was a prissy when it came to truly making a full effort on other surfaces
Which is why he was the second best hardcourter for much of 1997 behind Sampras while his clay form disappeared in a puff of smoke, and why he's won masters series titles on hardcourt and carpet, beating guys like Sampras, Courier and Bruguera. Interesting.
Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
Mustard
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mustard
Old 11-11-2011, 11:24 AM   #29
Datacipher
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,624
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mustard View Post
Are you saying it was no factor? Muster can't even fully bend his left leg to this day.



Which is why he was the second best hardcourter for much of 1997 behind Sampras while his clay form disappeared in a puff of smoke, and why he's won masters series titles on hardcourt and carpet, beating guys like Sampras, Courier and Bruguera. Interesting.
Yep....a prissy who wouldn't even show up at Wimbledon. His clay court went out the window because his super-human endurance suddenly evaporated...in a "puff of smoke" LOL. And, as I said, he had potential to be a good hardcourter...too bad he never fully developed it or showed consistent determination to.

Geez....can't fully bend his leg eh?? Good thing is must not be required to be able to do that, since he thought at age 83 he could come back to the tour! (rolls eyes).....same ol' Muster. I can certainly see why he just chased clay court points, and couldn't be bothered to show up at the most prestigous tourney in the world! Even Agassi learned by 21 or so, that facing up to your surface fears, may actually reap huge benefits for your game.
Datacipher is offline   Reply With Quote
Datacipher
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Datacipher
Old 11-12-2011, 01:50 AM   #30
timnz
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,643
Default Age?

I thought he was 59 not 60
timnz is offline   Reply With Quote
timnz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by timnz
Old 11-12-2011, 02:31 AM   #31
morten
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,901
Default

Amazing footwork then, and now i can see
morten is offline   Reply With Quote
morten
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by morten
Old 11-12-2011, 02:48 AM   #32
slice bh compliment
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,038
Default

Yeah, he's amazing. And he recently turned 59.
He was born in 1952, so I think he'll be 60 during the 2012 US Open.
slice bh compliment is offline   Reply With Quote
slice bh compliment
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by slice bh compliment
Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Connors 60 years !

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse