|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: In the future
Posts: 4,519
|
That backhand passing shot miss by Nadal pretty much changed the end result of the match. Had Nadal made that pass, he would have most likely held and go ahead by 5-2 score. and match would have been his. If Novak goes on to win the grand slam this year, then we will look back on that point as the history making point.
__________________
Babolat Pure drive 2012, 55 lbs, Kirschbaum Proline X / X-1 biphase. Nalbandian backhand and Nadal forehand. |
|
|
|
| Nostradamus |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nostradamus |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,914
|
Yes, one point could have also given Djokovic the first set, and the match would have been over in 3 sets. It would have than been one of the worst major finals played in the open era.
One point can not only change a match but it can completely change public perception, and tennis history. Last edited by Lsmkenpo : 01-29-2012 at 07:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 60
|
A point can change any match result. The line between winning and losing is very thin between two evenly matched opponents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: In the future
Posts: 4,519
|
i think that one point could change history as well. If Novak wins the Grand slam this year, history would have been made.
__________________
Babolat Pure drive 2012, 55 lbs, Kirschbaum Proline X / X-1 biphase. Nalbandian backhand and Nadal forehand. |
|
|
|
| Nostradamus |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nostradamus |
|
|
#5 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: brisbane,australia
Posts: 929
|
Ask Novak about THAT return of serve against Fed at the US Open last year. See what he thinks.
__________________
Never give up.Never,never,never,never. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,705
|
Yes, every single point of course has an effect on the score and the match in general. It's not like that single point decided it. It was a combination of everything. If Djokovic took advantage of his 5-3 lead while serving in the tiebreak, he would have wrapped it up in 4. He also had the 0-40 on Nadal's serve. etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,447
|
weve seen it happen countless of times
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,914
|
Not only can one point change a match, but many points can become insignificant as a result of one.
A player can win more points and games than his opponent but still lose the match. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 23,492
|
Wasn't there one point that changed Murray's match with someone last year. Pretty big match.
And one dropshot that changed Roger's match (RG final first set i think). Lots of such examples. Nice alternate universe of one-point-that-changed. Roger also admitted one point against Haas changed his match at 2009 RG.
__________________
"Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn." |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 580
|
I think it's much worse when the point is decided by an incorrect line call. Happened a few times in this tournament. eg. Berdych/Nadal, Isner/Nalbandian match.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wales
Posts: 7,147
|
Davydenko may well have lost the 2010 Australian Open with that wild forehand in the second set, when he had a break point for a double break against Federer in the quarter final.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
But yes, one point can turn around a match.
__________________
Advanced Forehand Racquet Wizard Masterclass |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,393
|
Federer's first set against Karlovic this Aussie. Luckiest net cord (I think) ever. Having a set point on Karlovic's serve and winning it with sheer luck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Land of the Free
Posts: 8,755
|
Yes sure can.
People need to remind themselves that at 5-3 Djoker went for a FH winner that was missed for same number of millimeters that Nadal missed that BH. While the passing shot would have given Nadal a 40-15 lead, the FH would give Djoker 3 match points. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 943
|
Easy Answer: NO
In peoples minds....yes |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,885
|
Roddick could have won Wimbledon 2009 if he had made that volley in the 2nd set TB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,609
|
Quote:
There is absolutely no chance of that ever happening.
__________________
Roger Federer is the GOAT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,107
|
The answer is yes - it can:
Murray missed chance at 7-5, 2-1, 15-30 on Rafa's serve at Wimbledon 2011 Rafa missed backhand at 2-2 4-2 30-15 against Novak at Australian Open 2012 Djokovic return at 2-2 4-5 15-40 on Federer's serve at US Open 2011 They are the ones that jump out at me! Murray's against Rafa in particular - once he hit that shot I knew in my head he would lose
__________________
No blog links in sigs - DD |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 174
|
Quote:
That would be the Wimby semi against Rafa. Looked like he would win before missing a simple forehand. |
|
|
|
|
| Vamos Rafa |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Vamos Rafa |
|
|
#20 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,030
|
Can anybody find some video of that shot? I can't find the highlight anywhere?
|
|
|
|
| winstonplum |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by winstonplum |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|