|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,542
|
I have pacific classic and MSV hex in one and it is SOFT. I'd string the gut higher then you would think..I did it at 60#s and 55#s on the MSV and the thing is still super powered..tons of spin. I had b5e/nvy in the other and the power difference is big time..I can't go back and forth between the 2 sticks without an adjustment.
Just can't agree with the prior review that there is less control and feel than a Pure Drive. I am not sure how that is even possible to be honest. The control on this stick is awesome for being a tweener. The feel is also very very good. Regardless if I can track down a new Pure Drive at some point I will give it a run next to my Pro Opens. Maybe something changed..who the heck knows. I played the last version of the GT and there is no way it is as solid as the Pro Open.
__________________
🐐ing Last edited by Power Player : 02-29-2012 at 05:38 AM. |
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#42 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,542
|
Ok update, I got a demo of the new PD and PD+.
I like to have the best racquet for my game too (and most comfortable) so I will give you folks my honest comparison after a few days of hitting with all 3 sticks.
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#43 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baseline
Posts: 2,209
|
I'm very curious about your perceptions on the relative power levels and control. When I saw comparisons between the PD and the Pro Open I was a little surprised.
While more powerful than my frame I didn't see the Pro Open nearly as powerful as the PD. The Pro Open also seemed more control oriented. They seem like very different frames.
__________________
L27" | 95" | 16x19 | Flex 57 | 336g | 8 HL | SW 320 VS Longevity / IsoSpeed Black Fire 17 @ 56 / 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,542
|
Quote:
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#45 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,181
|
Make sure they are strung the same. Honestly, that could have been a huge contributor to my dislike of the Wilson BLX Pro Open. May be a string sensitive racquet...many are!
__________________
5.0 game with 2.0 consistency. Babolat Pure Control Team 98 (348g 330 SW 9.5pts HL) |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
New User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 44
|
Same. It could have been the strings that TW put on the racquet. They seemed pretty dead and lifeless by the time I got to the racquet. Maybe tweeners are just not for me.
|
|
|
|
| Recoveringhobo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Recoveringhobo |
|
|
#47 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,542
|
Quote:
It has a crisper feel to it than the pro open. I could honestly use either one..they play very similar. The pro open is safer on the arm though..but man they played a lot alike. Pure drive does have a little more power I think.. Such a tough call..I'm going to string up a pd+ with rip control which is what I use in the pro open..same tension..everything. Then I will be able to give more detail.
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#48 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,181
|
Power Player, I like that you hit with both at the same time. I am afraid I have never done that, so my comparison is solely based on memory, and memory is a wee bit faulty (at least mine is). Keep us up to date!
__________________
5.0 game with 2.0 consistency. Babolat Pure Control Team 98 (348g 330 SW 9.5pts HL) |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baseline
Posts: 2,209
|
I hit with my wife's Pro Open and Pure Drive Roddick demos this afternoon (both 2012 editions). Both were nearly freshly strung with NXT 17 at mid-tension.
On serves it was no contest, I strongly preferred the PDR. Amazing power while the Pro Open felt sort of wispy. On ground strokes I strongly preferred the Pro Open. For some reason I was able to generate monster topspin with the PO while the PDR was more stingy in the spin department. The PO also felt more precise. I noticed the PDR has that classic Babolat string pattern...dense in the middle. The PO was closer to my 300 being more evenly spaced.
__________________
L27" | 95" | 16x19 | Flex 57 | 336g | 8 HL | SW 320 VS Longevity / IsoSpeed Black Fire 17 @ 56 / 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 144
|
Nice Review Timothy.
How did you find the comfort of the Babolat Pure Drive Roddick? |
|
|
|
| athleticstennis |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by athleticstennis |
|
|
#51 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,228
|
|
|
|
|
| The Baseline |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The Baseline |
|
|
#52 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baseline
Posts: 2,209
|
No issues. And my arm is sensitive. However, it was just a couple of sessions. Over long use, no idea.
__________________
L27" | 95" | 16x19 | Flex 57 | 336g | 8 HL | SW 320 VS Longevity / IsoSpeed Black Fire 17 @ 56 / 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,542
|
They need to make an extended one!
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#54 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baseline
Posts: 2,209
|
Quote:
My son has VERY limited formal tennis training but loves to hit. He is so freakin consistent with this thing it's scary. He can sustain rallies in casual back and forth hitting as well as, or better than, low level adults. If you put the ball anywhere near him at a reasonable level for his height it's coming back with pace and depth, fore or backhand. But he can even get back shots stretching and on the run. It's very stable in such situations. My wife used the demo in a doubles playoff match today and won handily (we dried the court this morning...an epic effort to avoid having her play during the week). Very few unforced errors on her part. She's no racketholic and will play with anything. She's also very frugal but even she absolutely wants to buy a Pro Open...immediately. She's very consistent but precision placement has never been a strength for her. She needs a big target. With the Pro Open she's nearly as precise as I am. And she says the feeling is effortless. Now, against heavy balls, it does get pushed around a bit. For grins I fired off some heavy topspin cannonballs at her and the frame was deflected by the impact. While AMAZINGLY stable against the shots she sees in 3.0/3.5/B-level ladies and mixed doubles I'm not sure the 11.1 oz is enough for something like mens 3.5/4.0 singles. Nothing some lead in the handle and a heavier grip couldn't fix. We're definitely buying two this week for my wife and son. This is the most impressive frame I've ever seen off the shelf for this level of play.
__________________
L27" | 95" | 16x19 | Flex 57 | 336g | 8 HL | SW 320 VS Longevity / IsoSpeed Black Fire 17 @ 56 / 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,542
|
It's a sick frame and I need to move 2 of them.
__________________
🐐ing |
|
|
|
| Power Player |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Power Player |
|
|
#56 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 517
|
TimothyO, you can compare the new (2012) Pro Open with the previous version?
For me, it does not matter a slight difference between these two versions of the weight, but the two extra stiffness points give reason to think |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,053
|
Interesting thread and comments about under appreciated frames. I have been playing sparingly all winter as I have hit the slopes hard 9 (50 days) but in Jan I picked up a used BLX Blade 98 (2011 version I believe), it's got crappy old Poly in it (from before I bot it) and I still love how this racket plays when I do play, simply solid all around, great control and feel on groundies and volleys, solid serve and good return. I'll be interested to see how it plays when I get my stringer fixed and can get a better sting job in there.
Drak |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 485
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
ptb5021
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Just gotta add my comment:
Serving is a dream with the BLX Pro Open |
|
| ptb5021 |
|
|
#60 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 664
|
Tim hi,
how is your son and wife getting on with the blx pro open 2012 version. did you do any modifications ? did you receive the racquets similar in weight balance or were they off. Im looking at this racquet as the pure drive is too harsh on my elbow with a poly Quote:
__________________
Wilson Pro Open BLX 2012 modded to 335g lead at 10 and 9 |
|
|
|
|
| Federerkblade |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Federerkblade |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|