• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Yonex Vcore Tour 89 and 97 specs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 48 1 2311 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2012, 12:54 PM   #1
scx
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 35
Default Yonex Vcore Tour 89 and 97 specs

I've just found the specs of the above mentioned racquets:

Yonex Vcore Tour 97
- Composition: Elastic Ti/High Modulus Graphite.
- Beam: 20 mm.
- Head Size: 97 sq. in. .
- Length: 68,50 cm.
- String Pattern: 16 - 19.
- String Tension: 26 - 24 Kp.
- Weight (unstrung): 310 g.

Yonex Vcore Tour 89
same composition, beam, length, string pattern and tension
different
- Head Size: 89 sq. in. .
- Weight (unstrung): 325 g.

My guess is that the 97 version is probably an update of RD TI 80 Lite.

Tour 89 Pic:


Tour 97 Pic:


Now, I "only" have to find Tour 97 for a test, to compare with the Vcore 98
and RD TI 80 Lite that I already own.
scx is offline   Reply With Quote
scx
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by scx
Old 02-16-2012, 12:59 PM   #2
nikosrf
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Thessaloniki, Greece
Posts: 306
Send a message via AIM to nikosrf
Default

What about stiffness?
__________________
For sale: 2 x Yonex RDiS 200 | 1 x Head Prestige YT MP | 1 x ProKennex Ionic Ki5
nikosrf is offline   Reply With Quote
nikosrf
View Public Profile
Visit nikosrf's homepage!
Find More Posts by nikosrf
Old 02-16-2012, 01:02 PM   #3
scotus
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,337
Default

I like the paint job of regular VCores much better.
scotus is offline   Reply With Quote
scotus
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by scotus
Old 02-16-2012, 02:07 PM   #4
djnemo
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norcal
Posts: 98
Default

Any idea on balance? Not much difference between the 97 and VCore 98 unless Balance is different....
__________________
Youtek Radical Pro; Signum Tornado 17 string
djnemo is offline   Reply With Quote
djnemo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by djnemo
Old 02-16-2012, 02:16 PM   #5
sargeinaz
Professional
 
sargeinaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,397
Default

These are nice. I like the paintjob way more than the regular v cores. I may need to demo these cause the 95D is great.
sargeinaz is offline   Reply With Quote
sargeinaz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sargeinaz
Old 02-16-2012, 02:50 PM   #6
Fed Kennedy
Hall Of Fame
 
Fed Kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: With Roger
Posts: 3,708
Default

Looks good, love the red. 310 grams for a tour frame seems kinda light...tempting though....
__________________
Its that thing when you have to play a jacked midget high on cortex while rollerblading
Fed Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Fed Kennedy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Fed Kennedy
Old 02-16-2012, 02:56 PM   #7
rdis10093
Hall Of Fame
 
rdis10093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: states
Posts: 2,768
Default

the 89 seems light to compared to the wilson, dunlop, and head mid frames.

I bet the 89 feels really flexy.
__________________
rdis 93 with lux adrenaline rough/syn gut @ 58/56
rdis10093 is offline   Reply With Quote
rdis10093
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by rdis10093
Old 02-16-2012, 05:17 PM   #8
zumzool
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 362
Default

not a tour weight at all.

the paint job reminds me of the rqis1 tour. not a fan of it...

the biggest difference from the vcore 95 is the string pattern....16 x 19 on this 97 tour version.
zumzool is offline   Reply With Quote
zumzool
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by zumzool
Old 02-16-2012, 06:53 PM   #9
Bartelby
Legend
 
Bartelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,522
Default

03 tour and radical pro are 310 = minimum tour weight
Bartelby is offline   Reply With Quote
Bartelby
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Bartelby
Old 02-16-2012, 09:57 PM   #10
Chyeaah
Professional
 
Chyeaah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,305
Default

Why is there Ti in there? Ti is titanium right?
__________________
Yonex 100S @ 55/57 lbs Cyberflash/Attraction
Just love Federer's one-handed backhand
Chyeaah is offline   Reply With Quote
Chyeaah
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Chyeaah
Old 02-16-2012, 10:10 PM   #11
lefty001
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Default

I guess these are going to replace the URD Ti 80s.
I am guessing the flex is going to be low 60s.
__________________
Yonex Ti80 Lite // USRSA Member //
lefty001 is offline   Reply With Quote
lefty001
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by lefty001
Old 02-16-2012, 11:15 PM   #12
Fed Kennedy
Hall Of Fame
 
Fed Kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: With Roger
Posts: 3,708
Default

So the basic idea is that these are flexier?
__________________
Its that thing when you have to play a jacked midget high on cortex while rollerblading
Fed Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Fed Kennedy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Fed Kennedy
Old 02-16-2012, 11:58 PM   #13
lefty001
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 133
Default

I would say more low powered and control oriented.
Lower powered than the 95D
__________________
Yonex Ti80 Lite // USRSA Member //
lefty001 is offline   Reply With Quote
lefty001
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by lefty001
Old 02-17-2012, 12:56 AM   #14
Automatix
Hall Of Fame
 
Automatix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,357
Default

Still the OP states that the composition is HMG and Elastic Ti aka Gummetal instead of the Ultimate Ti used in available today RD Ti 80.

Elastic Ti was used in the RDS models.
And was used by Toyota.
Automatix is offline   Reply With Quote
Automatix
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Automatix
Old 02-17-2012, 01:06 AM   #15
Jack Romeo
Professional
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 975
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Automatix View Post
Still the OP states that the composition is HMG and Elastic Ti aka Gummetal instead of the Ultimate Ti used in available today RD Ti 80.

Elastic Ti was used in the RDS models.
And was used by Toyota.
ultimum ti not ultimate ti. this is an older version of elastic ti. recall that the rd ti 80 is actually an older model than the rdx/rds/rdis series. but it was popular throughout the 2000's because of srichaphan and pierce. they had actually phased this model out already when they introduced the other series of rackets but they brought it back after a while.
Jack Romeo is offline   Reply With Quote
Jack Romeo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Jack Romeo
Old 02-17-2012, 01:08 AM   #16
Automatix
Hall Of Fame
 
Automatix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Romeo View Post
ultimum ti not ultimate ti. this is an older version of elastic ti. recall that the rd ti 80 is actually an older model than the rdx/rds/rdis series. but it was popular throughout the 2000's because of srichaphan and pierce. they had actually phased this model out already when they introduced the other series of rackets but they brought it back after a while.
And the bizarre headsize of the 89 Tour is more in line with the RD Ti 70 ( 88 ).
Automatix is offline   Reply With Quote
Automatix
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Automatix
Old 02-17-2012, 09:40 AM   #17
pavo26
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 8
Default

Any idea when they are scheduled to be released?
pavo26 is offline   Reply With Quote
pavo26
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by pavo26
Old 02-17-2012, 10:34 AM   #18
zumzool
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 362
Default

when I'm thinking tour weight... i'm thinking it should be one of the heaviest racquets in the line up...

the 95D is 10 grams heavier unstrung than the 97 tour....

with the similar specs of the 95D, it seems that the 97 tour should be heavier.
zumzool is offline   Reply With Quote
zumzool
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by zumzool
Old 02-17-2012, 11:12 AM   #19
sargeinaz
Professional
 
sargeinaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zumzool View Post
when I'm thinking tour weight... i'm thinking it should be one of the heaviest racquets in the line up...

the 95D is 10 grams heavier unstrung than the 97 tour....

with the similar specs of the 95D, it seems that the 97 tour should be heavier.
I agree, the 97 should be like 320-325g at least.
sargeinaz is offline   Reply With Quote
sargeinaz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sargeinaz
Old 02-17-2012, 11:21 AM   #20
rdis10093
Hall Of Fame
 
rdis10093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: states
Posts: 2,768
Default

guess fed no longer plays with the smallest headsize.
__________________
rdis 93 with lux adrenaline rough/syn gut @ 58/56
rdis10093 is offline   Reply With Quote
rdis10093
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by rdis10093
Reply
Page 1 of 48 1 2311 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Yonex Vcore Tour 89 and 97 specs

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse