|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,311
|
ATP stats suggest he might be.
Number 1 on the all time list for return games won Number 2 on the all time list for 1st serve return points won Number 3 on the all time list for 2nd serve return points won Only player to feature in top 3 of all 3 lists.
__________________
"If Murray were always good, he would not be so good." MixieP - Philosopher |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 744
|
Hard to say best ever, but certainly it's a very strong part of his game. I guess those stats suggest he is....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,182
|
Weak era.
(Sorry batz, someone had to do it lol. But I agree.) |
|
|
|
| DragonBlaze |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by DragonBlaze |
|
|
#4 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 12,557
|
Quote:
The real reason is slowing down of the surfaces and the fact that this made S&V that much harder. Murray would not be winning the amount of points on the return he's is winning today on the old faster surfaces. Another reason, of course, is the technology. Guys like Borg used a wooden racquet with which the serve is way harder to control. Murray is a master at that, but would probably not have a clue with a wooden racquet. So in an absolute sense he maybe is the best returner ever, but you can't really say that he did better at this than former ATP heroes who had a much tougher time returning. Also, a definition issue. What is a great returner? Someone who hits the RETURN OF SERVE well? or someone who wins a lot of points. Rafa is an average returner, but wins a lot of points because he's an AMAZING baseliner. Theoretically, one can have the best return of serve, yet still hardly win a point because his next ball is so poor. What do you mean by returner. Best return of serve or best return GAME? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 499
|
Quite possibly and the argument can be made for him. Personally I think Agassi and Hewitt are better over the last 20 years or so. Would put Murray third. When it comes to punishing second serves they are better than Murray. Even when it comes to punishing average to good serves. Hewitt and Agassi could punish even the Federer serve in a way Murray cannot. Hewitt even now can punish Djokovic's serve. Murray and Federer are probably the two best defensive returners I have seen.
The stats are telling, but not the be all for several reasons. 1. You have to take into account that return stats are always going to favour the player with a better defence. Case in point Murray is always going to win more points that Agassi when he has been made to run. 2. Murray plays on slower hard courts than Agassi and Hewitt did. 3. Murray has yet to decline. Agassi had several years where he was playing terrible tennis and continued to play into an advanced age. Hewitt has been fighting on the tour for 6 years, after injuries finished him as a top player. Murray's numbers will no doubt fall if he is a 31 year old ranked in the 80s. |
|
|
|
| roberttennis54 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by roberttennis54 |
|
|
#6 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,311
|
Good to see such reasonable responses so far. For my part - I can't see past Agassi in any 'best returner' debate.
__________________
"If Murray were always good, he would not be so good." MixieP - Philosopher |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 395
|
Quote:
Second, as others mentioned, Andy is mid-career, i.e. his stats don't yet include the almost inevitable age-related decline in performance which is factored into retired rivals' numbers (e.g. Chang's). Third, stats only tell you so much, but they never take into account the opponent or the occasion. One of the reasons Sampras rates so highly as a server was his ability to ace when he was break-point down, or match-point up. Becker too was a guy who played better at critical junctures. And of course Djokovic had an uncanny ability in 2011 to hit the lines when it really mattered ~ as Roger Federer would attest to. I don't think Murray has a track record like that yet as a returner. Fourth, as raised by other posters, the changing technologies and court speeds of the last ten years mean that it's probably easier for returners than in the '70s or '80s (fast grass, wooden racquet, blah blah blah). But I do acknowledge that he is one of the very best over the past 20-25 years, no doubt about it. Regards, MDL Last edited by Monsieur_DeLarge : 09-05-2012 at 06:26 AM. Reason: Other posts above me... |
|
|
|
|
| Monsieur_DeLarge |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Monsieur_DeLarge |
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 3,867
|
Agassi>Hewitt>Mugray
__________________
BigForehand - Nadull will need a gun and extended mags to take Federer out at Wimbledon, even with his abuse and polyester. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: England
Posts: 5,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 765
|
1. Andre Agassi
Last edited by BigboyDan : 09-05-2012 at 08:21 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 999
|
Murray is not even close to Djokovic on hard-court return.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 286
|
Fanboy approved thread!!!!
|
|
|
|
| Frying Pan Forehand |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Frying Pan Forehand |
|
|
#13 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 154
|
Yes those glorious returns got him 0 sets in hardcourt GS finals
__________________
There are things known, and things unknown, and in between are The Doors. |
|
|
|
| seattle_1hander |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by seattle_1hander |
|
|
#14 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,519
|
Ever heard of Connors,Budge,Agassi?
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 508
|
|
|
|
|
| NikeWilson |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NikeWilson |
|
|
#16 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,311
|
Thank you for your approval, Fanboy.
__________________
"If Murray were always good, he would not be so good." MixieP - Philosopher |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,311
|
And you could well be right - there is no definitive basis for establishing 'best returner' - I was being a bit naughty in the thread title. I just thought it noteworthy that Murray appeared so high on the 'career' lists - I didn't expect that.
__________________
"If Murray were always good, he would not be so good." MixieP - Philosopher |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 499
|
|
|
|
|
| roberttennis54 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by roberttennis54 |
|
|
#19 |
|
New User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 95
|
To those who think he would not have returned as well on the faster courts - don't forget that the players then were not facing 140+mph serves a lot of the time. The courts may be slower now, but the modern technology aids much faster serves.
In other words, you can't compare eras. |
|
|
|
| decrepitude |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by decrepitude |
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,823
|
Two words. Andre Agassi.
|
|
|
|
| Prisoner of Birth |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Prisoner of Birth |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|