|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,518
|
Quote:
Are you talking about some exhibition matches? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 643
|
Serena Williams VS Steffi Graff 1999 Indian Wells
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJE4vCj155o Whoever wins this match is the Greatest. |
|
|
|
| NikeWilson |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NikeWilson |
|
|
#23 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,626
|
that's exhibition. Do you also believe that Sampras beat Federer fair and square in Macao in 2007? lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 943
|
Venus didnt shine outside of grass since 2001 and that has to say you something right,and this has nothing to do with immune disease,because she won many Wimbledon titles after 2001.Serena one of the greatest ever,Venus great but certainly not in the same league with Graf,Martina and Serena.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,099
|
Quote:
As far as records -- no, Venus is not of the caliber of Graf, Navratilova, Everett; but neither is Serena! At least not yet, the only category she might catch up in is # of slams (I highly doubt she will reach Graf's 22)... As far as form: Venus is the best I've ever seen, except on clay. No woman has been faster or more offensive and explosive. If you disagree, thats your prerogative, but don't act as if your opinion is fact; particularly when it's being bolstered by Serena's results against a very weak current field... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,542
|
Serena is far from the greatest. Winning slams in the worst WTA field in HISTORY full of talentless mugs wouldn't change that
If Graf spent half her career playing this awful field she manages a slam count in the high 30s Hell Serena can't even stay at #1 vs. this mug field |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,518
|
Quote:
Evert, Martina N, Pam Shriver, etc have all admitted that women's tennis is deeper than it ever was. During their eras, they most often didn't play competative matches until late in the 2nd week of a slam. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
Graf's era spanned Martina Navratilova, Monica Seles , Sabatini, Hingis, Chris Evert , Arantxa Sanchez , Lindsay, Venus, Conchita Martinez, Mary Pierce. Serena's era - only noteworthy opponent is Justine Henin. |
|
|
|
|
| tennisaddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisaddict |
|
|
#29 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,518
|
Quote:
Sorry, but there is a ton more depth in today's game than what Graf faced. Graf basically got 4-5 easy wins every slam. No wonder she won as many slams as she did. Graf would definitely not be as dominant a player today as she was in her heydey...especially if she still never developed a solid topspin backhand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 643
|
Here's was an interesting Sports Illustrated article about this last year.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...ams/index.html |
|
|
|
| NikeWilson |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NikeWilson |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Argentina
Posts: 566
|
Quote:
Players outisde the TOP 20 (or even top 10) lose 6-2 6-0 to the top players. This is the worst WTA ever. Graff and martina are better than Serena.
__________________
There's no Dark Side of the Moon really, matter of fact it's all dark. |
|
|
|
|
| BauerAlmeida |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BauerAlmeida |
|
|
#32 |
|
G.O.A.T.
|
Graf is the greatest.......
__________________
Why fight over who is G.O.A.T., when the world is just an abstract of reality~ http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/525347 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 389
|
Steffi is the greatest! Seles might have been the Nadal of Graf had she not been stab (the signs are showing more and more back then)...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,054
|
Serena cannot be the greatest when she has only reached one French Open final during her career.
Since Henin's first retirement in 2008 the women's clay court field has been incredibly weak, and Serena still hasn't been able to reach the last 4 at RG during that time as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,054
|
Still I will reiterate that Serena has played by far the best tennis I have ever seen from a woman on grass and hard courts. Incredible stuff to watch.
And unlike someone like Navratilova who is obsessed with her legacy, I don't think Serena overly cares too much about where people rank her in relation to other greats. Still it would be funny if Serena could surpass 18 slam titles, to see how Navratilova would react to that. Evert congratulated Graf when she moved past 18 slam titles at RG in 1996, while Navratilova was incredibly bitter. I really do fear the future of women's tennis when Serena and Venus do eventually retire. Even Sharapova hasn't been able to draw huge TV ratings for her big tournament finals in recent years against the likes of Kvitova and Errani. She has needed Serena on the other side of the net like with the Olympic final to get many casual fans to tune in. Last edited by Gizo : 09-08-2012 at 12:07 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,871
|
Quote:
I would still not call her the best ever but she faced a lot tougher opposition as steffi, evert or even moreso court and jean king faced. Last edited by dominikk1985 : 09-08-2012 at 12:20 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| dominikk1985 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by dominikk1985 |
|
|
#37 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,332
|
Quote:
When Venus was just on tour and quickly was a major force, people in that time were already saying that Venus had a younger sister who was even more talented, so I don't think it is far fetched to think that Serena is the better player.
__________________
I rather argue with 3 Nadal-***** than with 1 Sampras-lover.. Yes Sampras-lovers are 3 times worse than Nadal-*****. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,721
|
Serena never faced the density of champions that Graf or Hingis faced at their prime.Like Federer, the weak fields she faced belittle her achievements and put them straight into second tier ( which ainīt bad)
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,758
|
no she is not. It is Graf by far. check your facts guys. Serena will never achieve what Steffy did, plus she is playing in this silly era with no competition.
when you grow up, go watch some Graf's s matches and you'll understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,652
|
Could Serena have beaten Evert with wooden rackets inhibiting heavily powered topspin strokes familiar with Serena, insisting instead on levels of stroking accuracy that are off of the charts? And repeat those strokes using only wooden rackets. . .it cannot be done. Serena would be disadvantaged, IMO. Serena has harnessed the power of modern rackets, defining the upper limits to power in the women's game. She is not some undisputed goat or "the best ever to play," but I am immensely proud of her coming back and it's frightening how quickly she became dominant again.
__________________
wilson graphite matrix (red/black) : 58# forten nylon : bare leather grip Last edited by DeShaun : 09-08-2012 at 01:56 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|