Comparing Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic since 2009

McEnroeisanartist · 10-04-2012, 03:08 PM

Since 2009, Federer has won 19 titles, 3 on clay, 2 on grass, 7 on hard, and 7 indoor. Nadal has won 19 titles, 14 on clay, 4 on hard, 1 on grass, and 0 indoor. Djokovic has won 20 titles, 4 on clay, 13 on hard, 1 on grass, and 2 indoor.

Remarkable that old man Federer has kept pace with his younger rivals. Also remarkable that Nadal has not won a single indoor tournament.

Evan77 · 10-04-2012, 04:04 PM

well, kudos to Rog for sure. Not surprised with Nadal. Indoor is his weakest surface. I don't think he'll ever win anything indoor. Djoko peaked in 2011, his 2009/10 season was very mediocre (no slams, no big wins, lost his serve completely because of that stupid racket change etc.)

RF20Lennon · 10-04-2012, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evan77

well, kudos to Rog for sure. Not surprised with Nadal. Indoor is his weakest surface. I don't think he'll ever win anything indoor. Djoko peaked in 2011, his 2009/10 season was very mediocre (no slams, no big wins, lost his serve completely because of that stupid racket change etc.)

Completely agree!!!!

Nathaniel_Near · 10-04-2012, 04:06 PM

Novak Djokovic, the beast of hard courts.

Evan77 · 10-04-2012, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathaniel_Near

Novak Djokovic, the beast of hard courts.

yeah, I guess you can call him that. I'd say he is the king of slow to medium H.C. Fast HC don't even exist any more

Zarfot Z · 10-05-2012, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evan77

yeah, I guess you can call him that. I'd say he is the king of slow to medium H.C. Fast HC don't even exist any more

Barely. Dubai and Cincinnati both faithfully remain fast court tournaments.

batz · 10-05-2012, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McEnroeisanartist

Since 2009, Federer has won 19 titles, 3 on clay, 2 on grass, 7 on hard, and 7 indoor. Nadal has won 19 titles, 14 on clay, 4 on hard, 1 on grass, and 0 indoor. Djokovic has won 20 titles, 4 on clay, 13 on hard, 1 on grass, and 2 indoor.

Remarkable that old man Federer has kept pace with his younger rivals. Also remarkable that Nadal has not won a single indoor tournament.

Both are quite remarkable, agreed. Rafa has only won 1 indoor tournament in his entire career.

I'm going to throw Murray's numbers into the ring as well: 16 titles, 13 on hard, 3 on grass - 2 indoor. Murray with the most grass titles since 2009.

Hard: Noel
Clay: Rafa
Indoor: Roger
Grass:Murray

.

batz · 10-05-2012, 12:58 AM

EDIT Doublepost

helloworld · 10-05-2012, 01:20 AM

How many slams did Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic won since 2009?

batz · 10-05-2012, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helloworld

How many slams did Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic won since 2009?

All of them apart from 2.

NadalAgassi · 10-05-2012, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helloworld

How many slams did Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic won since 2009?

Nadal 6
Djokovic 4
Federer 4

RAFA2005RG · 10-05-2012, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McEnroeisanartist

Since 2009, Federer has won 19 titles, 3 on clay, 2 on grass, 7 on hard, and 7 indoor. Nadal has won 19 titles, 14 on clay, 4 on hard, 1 on grass, and 0 indoor. Djokovic has won 20 titles, 4 on clay, 13 on hard, 1 on grass, and 2 indoor.

Remarkable that old man Federer has kept pace with his younger rivals. Also remarkable that Nadal has not won a single indoor tournament.

The slam comparison is obviously all that matters-
Nadal 6 (3rg, 1ao, 1uso, 1wim)
Djokovic 4 (2ao, 1wim, 1uso)
Federer 4 (2wim, 1ao, 1rg)

6-1 6-3 6-0 · 10-05-2012, 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RAFA2005RG

The slam comparison is obviously all that matters-
Nadal 6 (3rg, 1ao, 1uso, 1wim)
Djokovic 4 (2ao, 1wim, 1uso)
Federer 4 (2wim, 1ao, 1rg)

Wow. And Nadal is the only player of that lot to win at least one of each slam since 2009, proving he is technically more diverse than Federer/Djokovic.

Polvorin · 10-05-2012, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6-1 6-3 6-0

Wow. And Nadal is the only player of that lot to win at least one of each slam since 2009, proving he is technically more diverse than Federer/Djokovic.

When all the courts play almost equally slow it's easier to win with a 1-dimensional game, no?

beast of mallorca · 10-05-2012, 03:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polvorin

When all the courts play almost equally slow it's easier to win with a 1-dimensional game, no?

So thats why Federer amassed the 17 Slams he's had. Hmmmmm

Duncan Bell · 10-05-2012, 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by batz

Hard: Noel
Clay: Rafa
Indoor: Roger
Grass:Murray

.

Think Murray is contesting Nole for king of Hard, particularly after winning the USO, and the fact that Murray is 4-3 against Djokovic on hard (including indoor that is). I'm not too convinced by the differentiation between HC indoor/outdoor, particularly when considering Murray vs Djoker

tennis_pro · 10-05-2012, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beast of mallorca

So thats why Federer amassed the 17 Slams he's had. Hmmmmm

last time I checked Federer was already winning slams in 2003, how did Hafa do out of clay before 2008 again?

Tammo · 10-05-2012, 04:08 AM

Make Fed's clay titles 2, Madrid this year was a fluke...

Russeljones · 10-05-2012, 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by batz

Both are quite remarkable, agreed. Rafa has only won 1 indoor tournament in his entire career.

I'm going to throw Murray's numbers into the ring as well: 16 titles, 13 on hard, 3 on grass - 2 indoor. Murray with the most grass titles since 2009.

Hard: Noel
Clay: Rafa
Indoor: Roger
Grass:Murray

.

I am sorry but unlike the other 3, Murray hasn't won Wimbledon. So that kinda undermines his case for grass superiority.

wy2sl0 · 10-05-2012, 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6-1 6-3 6-0

Wow. And Nadal is the only player of that lot to win at least one of each slam since 2009, proving he is technically more diverse than Federer/Djokovic.

Why even say that when it isn't true?

If anything Roger and Novak play well everywhere, whereas when Nadal doesn't have the elements outdoors to even the playing field he generally gets lit up.

See, I can do that too - the difference is my statement is true and everyone knows it.

10-04-2012, 03:08 PM	#1
McEnroeisanartist Professional Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 943	Comparing Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic since 2009 Since 2009, Federer has won 19 titles, 3 on clay, 2 on grass, 7 on hard, and 7 indoor. Nadal has won 19 titles, 14 on clay, 4 on hard, 1 on grass, and 0 indoor. Djokovic has won 20 titles, 4 on clay, 13 on hard, 1 on grass, and 2 indoor. Remarkable that old man Federer has kept pace with his younger rivals. Also remarkable that Nadal has not won a single indoor tournament.

10-04-2012, 04:06 PM	#4
Nathaniel_Near Hall Of Fame Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: UK Posts: 3,057	Novak Djokovic, the beast of hard courts. __________________ Hoodjem - ''AHA!!! That's what TMF stands for Triumphant Muscles Forever.'' * TMF, the ultimate Ken Rosewall **.

10-05-2012, 12:58 AM	#8
batz G.O.A.T. Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 12,301	EDIT Doublepost __________________ "If Murray were always good, he would not be so good." MixieP - Philosopher

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode