|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: vote | |||
| Blake |
|
31 | 53.45% |
| Hewitt |
|
27 | 46.55% |
| Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
in their prime of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,683
|
Blake is definitely faster, guy was a speed demon in his prime. People may vote Hewitt just because he's a defensive player and had a lot more opportunity to show off, but anyone who actually watched the two of them play would say Blake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 850
|
Prime Blake videos I watch show him IMO to be the fastest lateral mover I have seen on a court.
__________________
K Factor K Surge |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 813
|
Pure speed- blake
Footwork, reflexes, agility- Hewitt
__________________
Federer in 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,467
|
^^^ Yeap. Blake is clearly faster, but Hewitt's actual court movement was better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,986
|
Is Blake the fastest of all time or is there another player that was faster? What about Borg?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
G.O.A.T.
|
Blake would beat a horse on the track. Too fast/.
__________________
Why fight over who is G.O.A.T., when the world is just an abstract of reality~ http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/525347 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 499
|
Blake for me is faster, but Hewitt is not far behind. These two guys are only behind Monfils and Phau for me.
|
|
|
|
| roberttennis54 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by roberttennis54 |
|
|
#12 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,585
|
Hewitt is ahead by a bit. Nadal, Monfils (just pure speed, not overall tennis movement which isnt even all that great for him), Borg and possibly Chang are all definitely faster than Hewitt though.
|
|
|
|
| NadalAgassi |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NadalAgassi |
|
|
#13 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 499
|
Completely disagree. Blake is faster than Nadal. In fact not sure if Nadal is fastr than Federer. Chang slower than Hewitt, but faster than Federer and Nadal. As I said before Monfils is the quickest.
|
|
|
|
| roberttennis54 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by roberttennis54 |
|
|
#14 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
Quote:
Federer may have been more agile and nimble than Nadal, since he was never muscled. But in raw horsepower, Nadal clearly edges him and Djokovic too for that matter. (IMO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 499
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| roberttennis54 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by roberttennis54 |
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: states
Posts: 2,768
|
the aussie takes this one
__________________
rdis 93 with lux adrenaline rough/syn gut @ 58/56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
G.O.A.T.
|
Blake and Federer faster than Nadal? Do you remember how fast Nadal was from 05-09?
__________________
"Of course it's happening inside your head Harry... why should that mean that it's not real?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 499
|
|
|
|
|
| roberttennis54 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by roberttennis54 |
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 609
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|