• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page What Are Your Thoughts on Prokennex?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 4 of 5 « First < 23 4 5 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2012, 11:19 PM   #61
smirker
Professional
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by danix View Post
It's kind of ironic that I am back to PK actually. My first "real" racquet was a Copper Ace, and I used the Ceramic Destiny throughout most of college.
Similar to me then Danix, used the old PK Copper Ace back in the day. Have hit with it recently and it's incredibly low powered. Don't know how I got the ball over the net as a 14 year old!

Ki5 coming on Monday, what's your experience of it?
__________________
Pro Kennex Ki5 315. Challenger 1 stringer.
smirker is offline   Reply With Quote
smirker
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by smirker
Old 10-29-2012, 01:00 PM   #62
kenyee
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, PRofMA
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dzg View Post
Why is it that all ProKennex racquets are for advanced players (NTRP 4+) only??
Ignore it. Try it and if you like it, use it.
I'm a 3-3.5 depending on the day. The PK5G and Redondo MP work fine for me.

I think the lower level players don't take smooth swings is the issue...that technique works fine for overpowered tweener/beginner racquets, but doesn't work against players at the 4+ level...
kenyee is offline   Reply With Quote
kenyee
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kenyee
Old 11-03-2012, 12:12 PM   #63
danix
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smirker View Post
Similar to me then Danix, used the old PK Copper Ace back in the day. Have hit with it recently and it's incredibly low powered. Don't know how I got the ball over the net as a 14 year old!

Ki5 coming on Monday, what's your experience of it?
I dislike the Ki5, but I've acclimated to it. It's the only thing I can play without pain right now. The Q Tour feels a lot better to me, but the weight bothers my arm. The Q5 is a slightly stiffer Ki5 and I will likely move to that.
danix is offline   Reply With Quote
danix
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by danix
Old 11-03-2012, 12:18 PM   #64
aimr75
Hall Of Fame
 
aimr75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,742
Default

Tried the older us version of the BA98. Really great frame.
aimr75 is offline   Reply With Quote
aimr75
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by aimr75
Old 11-03-2012, 12:51 PM   #65
Mister drool
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 168
Default

does anyonw knows if the grommets for the black ace 93 will fit the redondo mid and vice versa?

my older redondo mid realy needs a new set and im not sure if the racquet mold is the same, so ... if anyone has tried it please let me know
Mister drool is offline   Reply With Quote
Mister drool
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mister drool
Old 11-03-2012, 07:34 PM   #66
anirut
Hall Of Fame
 
anirut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Krungthep (Bangkok), Siam (Thailand)
Posts: 4,861
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister drool View Post
does anyonw knows if the grommets for the black ace 93 will fit the redondo mid and vice versa?

my older redondo mid realy needs a new set and im not sure if the racquet mold is the same, so ... if anyone has tried it please let me know
Yes, they will fit. The BA93 and Redondo Mid are from the same mold.
__________________
PK REDONDO TALKS & INTERESTING LINKS REGARDING REDONDO:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=102323

Making a Super Redondo:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1113290&postcount=355

"Don't play what's there. Play what's not there." -- Miles Davis
anirut is offline   Reply With Quote
anirut
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by anirut
Old 11-04-2012, 09:34 PM   #67
Steve Huff
Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,945
Default

Great rackets, Poor Marketing strategy.
Steve Huff is offline   Reply With Quote
Steve Huff
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Steve Huff
Old 11-05-2012, 05:41 AM   #68
smirker
Professional
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 1,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Huff View Post
Great rackets, Poor Marketing strategy.
Too true Steve. For a country of 65 million people it appears we have one online retailer of PK racquets. Thanks god for TW Europe, hopefully they have saved my PD induced throbbing elbow by sending me a lovely Ki5.
__________________
Pro Kennex Ki5 315. Challenger 1 stringer.
smirker is offline   Reply With Quote
smirker
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by smirker
Old 11-05-2012, 12:09 PM   #69
kenyee
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boston, PRofMA
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by smirker View Post
saved my PD induced throbbing elbow by sending me a lovely Ki5.
If the Ki5 still bothers you, put on gut for string at lower than mid tension. And try a PK5G if the Ki5 is too stiff (I found the Ki5 to bother my wrist tendonitis more than the PK5G)...
kenyee is offline   Reply With Quote
kenyee
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by kenyee
Old 11-05-2012, 02:47 PM   #70
GrandSlam45
New User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 60
Default

I've been playing for a few weeks with the Ki5 and KLIP hybrid 16 strings - half gut, half multi - strung at 53lbs.

Is there such a thing as "too" comfortable!? With this set up, it almost feels like playing badmitton

REALLY good on the arm though and great control.
GrandSlam45 is offline   Reply With Quote
GrandSlam45
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by GrandSlam45
Old 11-05-2012, 02:55 PM   #71
Dgdavid
Professional
 
Dgdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 807
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandSlam45 View Post
I've been playing for a few weeks with the Ki5 and KLIP hybrid 16 strings - half gut, half multi - strung at 53lbs.

Is there such a thing as "too" comfortable!? With this set up, it almost feels like playing badmitton

REALLY good on the arm though and great control.
Very interesting Grandslam. Is the gut in the mains or crosses? Both at 53lbs?
__________________
Contemplating next move...
Dgdavid is offline   Reply With Quote
Dgdavid
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Dgdavid
Old 11-05-2012, 04:11 PM   #72
Steve Huff
Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,945
Default

I've put gut mains, Wilson Shock Shield at 60# in this last time I strung my ki5. More power than I expected. Next time I'll go up to 62. Plays very good though, and very easy on the arm. I've tried gut/poly at 58/53 and the gut/SS at 60 is a lot easier on the arm.
Steve Huff is offline   Reply With Quote
Steve Huff
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Steve Huff
Old 11-09-2012, 07:12 AM   #73
whylow
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Default

i have recently started playing with the PK redondo type C mid which i think is really great. i thought i would buy a BA93 as well, but very confusing understanding all these different models and after hours on the net - ive come to the following:
BA93 - US MODEL - not perfect / bit too high SW for me so i thought not to go for it......
BA 93 2012 -US MODEL - better specs for my liking - but at present, no reviews or customer comments - so maybe not such a good idea, because people talk about the BA98 2012 being not as good as the earlier version...? (if contruction / material / technology gives any indication about the feel and playability of the racket)
BA 93- 315g -EURO (a 2012 model according to TWE) - very similar to the BA93 2012 US MOD in specs (no flex value) but not the same racket - but maybe good because 100% graphite and nicer paintjob?

so the question is should i go for the EURO 315g version or the US 2012 version. has anyone tested these rackets and able to compare them with REDONDO or BA93 (not 2012). all info is welcomed cause i gotta make my order soon....
whylow is offline   Reply With Quote
whylow
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by whylow
Old 11-09-2012, 08:40 PM   #74
anirut
Hall Of Fame
 
anirut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Krungthep (Bangkok), Siam (Thailand)
Posts: 4,861
Default

IMO, there are too many versions of the BA right now that everything gets so confusing. I think TW SHOULD help clarify all these minor quirks.

My 2 cents ...
__________________
PK REDONDO TALKS & INTERESTING LINKS REGARDING REDONDO:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=102323

Making a Super Redondo:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1113290&postcount=355

"Don't play what's there. Play what's not there." -- Miles Davis
anirut is offline   Reply With Quote
anirut
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by anirut
Old 11-09-2012, 08:48 PM   #75
JGads
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whylow View Post
i have recently started playing with the PK redondo type C mid which i think is really great. i thought i would buy a BA93 as well, but very confusing understanding all these different models and after hours on the net - ive come to the following:
BA93 - US MODEL - not perfect / bit too high SW for me so i thought not to go for it......
BA 93 2012 -US MODEL - better specs for my liking - but at present, no reviews or customer comments - so maybe not such a good idea, because people talk about the BA98 2012 being not as good as the earlier version...? (if contruction / material / technology gives any indication about the feel and playability of the racket)
BA 93- 315g -EURO (a 2012 model according to TWE) - very similar to the BA93 2012 US MOD in specs (no flex value) but not the same racket - but maybe good because 100% graphite and nicer paintjob?

so the question is should i go for the EURO 315g version or the US 2012 version. has anyone tested these rackets and able to compare them with REDONDO or BA93 (not 2012). all info is welcomed cause i gotta make my order soon....
I have both the old Black Ace Mid and the '2012 US' mid model. Pretty much the exact same racquet, just slightly less swingweight than the old one. Feel is identical. So is the paintjob. I honestly feel like PK must have just had an extra set of Black Ace Mids that came in under spec and they gave them to TW to sell as the '2012' model, because there were only a small handful available, can't find them anywhere else and the paintjob and feel is completely the same... Both amazing sticks. If you're leery of the higher swingweight, jump on the 2012 if you still even can.
__________________
42
JGads is offline   Reply With Quote
JGads
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JGads
Old 11-10-2012, 03:41 AM   #76
whylow
New User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JGads View Post
I have both the old Black Ace Mid and the '2012 US' mid model. Pretty much the exact same racquet, just slightly less swingweight than the old one. Feel is identical. So is the paintjob. I honestly feel like PK must have just had an extra set of Black Ace Mids that came in under spec and they gave them to TW to sell as the '2012' model, because there were only a small handful available, can't find them anywhere else and the paintjob and feel is completely the same... Both amazing sticks. If you're leery of the higher swingweight, jump on the 2012 if you still even can.
excellent info JGads - thank you. just what i was wondering about. it is going to make things much easier for decision making and securing a racket in time. your theory about these mystical BA93 2012 models is also pretty good....
whylow is offline   Reply With Quote
whylow
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by whylow
Old 11-10-2012, 07:51 AM   #77
klementine79
Hall Of Fame
 
klementine79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DcMdVa
Posts: 3,651
Default

Anirut, or anyone who's played/plays with the redondo.

How does the grip measure up, wilson-like? Do they run small/big?

Thanks a bunch.

EDIT: I've also heard (believe it was in the comments section) that the specs TW has up for the redondos are UN-strung. Are they really 12.7oz sticks? Hard to believe.
__________________
Tommy Haasian GOATmode*
* = FedK (tm)

Last edited by klementine79 : 11-10-2012 at 08:05 AM.
klementine79 is offline   Reply With Quote
klementine79
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by klementine79
Old 11-10-2012, 05:08 PM   #78
anirut
Hall Of Fame
 
anirut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Krungthep (Bangkok), Siam (Thailand)
Posts: 4,861
Default

Klementine,

PK grip is sorta like Dunlop, just a tad more rectangular. As for size, umm ... may be (a big may be) a tad smaller than the number says compared to Wilson. This could be due to the shape that may give the "illusion" that it's smaller. Not a deal breaker.

TW's spec is strung, for certain.
__________________
PK REDONDO TALKS & INTERESTING LINKS REGARDING REDONDO:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=102323

Making a Super Redondo:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1113290&postcount=355

"Don't play what's there. Play what's not there." -- Miles Davis
anirut is offline   Reply With Quote
anirut
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by anirut
Old 11-10-2012, 05:12 PM   #79
klementine79
Hall Of Fame
 
klementine79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: DcMdVa
Posts: 3,651
Default

^Good Lookin' out Anirut.

Thanks a mil.
__________________
Tommy Haasian GOATmode*
* = FedK (tm)
klementine79 is offline   Reply With Quote
klementine79
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by klementine79
Old 11-11-2012, 03:48 AM   #80
mikeler
G.O.A.T.
 
mikeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 14,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Huff View Post
I've put gut mains, Wilson Shock Shield at 60# in this last time I strung my ki5. More power than I expected. Next time I'll go up to 62. Plays very good though, and very easy on the arm. I've tried gut/poly at 58/53 and the gut/SS at 60 is a lot easier on the arm.
Interesting. I thought Shock Shield was a dead and fairly stiff multi.
mikeler is offline   Reply With Quote
mikeler
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mikeler
Reply
Page 4 of 5 « First < 23 4 5 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page What Are Your Thoughts on Prokennex?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse