|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,964
|
More importantly how do you string your Babolat rackets? I would string the top two crosses and hold the top cross with a starting clamp and pull tension on the second. Clamp the top two crosses with one clamp and use the other to string the remaining crosses down the racket. When you are done and tie off the bottom go back up and tension the top cross. Release the top flying clamp, the starting clamp, then clamp the top two crosses again and tie off.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
http://youtu.be/vIbR7OzJJ5k Your procedure differs from his in that you do not pull tension on the first cross, he does. Also you wait until you finish all the crosses before finishing off the top cross, he does that only about four crosses in and when the clamp is diagonal from the starting clamp. I never thought of your method but it seems good, perhaps better, or same difference? I'll definitely give it a try. what are your thoughts on the differences? I gotta go string now and try all this new stuff, thx, be back with results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Desert
Posts: 2,996
|
There are several good techniques for doing two piece without a starting knot.
Irvin's is a good one so is jim_e's. Don't dismiss Irvin just because he likes to yank our chains once in a while. He has taught us all a lot and his techniques are valid.
__________________
Neos 1000, Eagnas Combo 810(home),Prince 5000(work) Member USRSA |
|
|
|
| fortun8son |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fortun8son |
|
|
#24 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,964
|
Quote:
I double pull the top two crosses at the same time and the top cross does not blend over to the second while the racket is being strung. YULitle double pulls the top cross. I choose to wait until I get to the bottom to take the starting clamp off because the string bed is tighter because I think you have less drawback but it probably does not matter. It's is just a break of rhythm. EDIT: Also I do pull tension on the first cross when I am ready to remove the starting clamp. YULitle's method puts more stress on the string where the starting clamp is. because I am not pulling full tension on the top cross I can put the string farther up in the starting clamp toward the tip and it does not slip putting less crushing pressure on that top string.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' Last edited by Irvin : 11-01-2012 at 07:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
|
Quote:
Another question, does it matter if the flying clamps are above or below the racquet? To be honest its a pain in the *** to have the flying clamps below so I sometimes just clamp them above the racquet and I have been happy with the end result, just makes my life easier, though I have not seen anyone else (in my very limited world view of youtube) doing that. opinions? Obviously fixed clamps are another story, but is there some benefit to fixed clamps being below or do people just do that to try and replicate fixed clamp design out of habit? Of course fixed clamps are on the bottom because its easier to design the machine that way but for flying clamps, I can't see it making that great a difference but I have not seen anyone on youtube doing that even though it seems easier...??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
|
but is there some benefit to FLYING clamps being below?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,964
|
I think only clamping one string with flying clamps is a bad method. You cant clamp the mains that way and when to clamp the crosses the mains are holding the crosses. sounds like you are really losing a lot of tension and i don't see how it is possible to get consistent results. As far as putting the clamps on top no big deal I don't think.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
New User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
|
ok, but when doing the crosses only the first cross is held by itself with the flying clamp the rest are done holding two like normal, can there really be that much tension loss from just the top cross supposedly slipping?
Also if that is so why couldn't one just use a dummy piece of string if it is a mechanical issue with the clamps needing something there? I'm just looking for solutions here, thx to anyone for any positive help! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 6,964
|
Quote:
If you use a dummy piece of string or a start pin (Klippermate sells them) then you have to take the start pin out and take off the starting clamp. That is even more wasted effort. If you are talking about putting a dummy piece of string in the clamp so the string will not slip and you don't have to adjust your clamp for a single string your back to the string tension being lost. I am not talking about your string slipping in the clamp being the reason for not clamping the top cross only. I am saying that way you will have a lot of drawback and you loose all your tension.
__________________
Irvin - I wish Facebook would notify me when people delete me so I can 'Like it' |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|