|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Doubles players which is better your forehand or backhand volley? | |||
| Forehand |
|
23 | 37.10% |
| Backhand |
|
28 | 45.16% |
| Both about equal |
|
11 | 17.74% |
| Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,249
|
Well, I can say the same for my 1hbh backhand overhead.
I usually short angle it. When the opponent starts to cheat that side, I hit it flat, deep, and DTL, for another clean winner, behind him. From service line positioning, it doesn't take much pace to hit a clean winner. Angle and lack of time for your opponent is your friend. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| amorris525 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by amorris525 |
|
|
#23 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 4,463
|
My backhand volley hits absolutely spectacular shots for me it seems, while my forehand hits absolute garbage. I dump my forehand volley quite a bit more then I'd like to admit, but my backhand is able to really place it well.
That being said, my "forehand" overhead is 10,000% better then my backhand overhead. -Fuji |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,725
|
I grew up on racquetball so my forehand is more natural to take low or off a half volley. Backhand just can't get the same power. Placement is not an issue, but having a couple extra mph on the FH is the difference for me.
|
|
|
|
| floridatennisdude |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by floridatennisdude |
|
|
#25 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,114
|
I to volley better from the backhand side and thinking about it...I think it's probably for the exact same reasons. I'd like to know from one of the teaching pros why this seems to be the case....Timbo? Is there any truth to this or is this in our imagination?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| chatt_town |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by chatt_town |
|
|
#26 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 382
|
actually the 2hbh overhead might be my best shot.
__________________
The everyman's blobber |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 386
|
What is a 2HBH "overhead"?
I'm pretty sure even if you have a 2HBH you still use a 1HBH for your "overhead". Swinging volley sure. Overhead? No. I dont think so.
__________________
"In the 1980's two men dominated--sometimes each other, most of the time everyone else." |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 382
|
If the ball is over my head to the bh side, then I swing at it like a little kid going after a piņata.
__________________
The everyman's blobber |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 4,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 669
|
Quote:
It ain't a swing volley that I am describing. It is a 2HBH overhead. Two hands hitting an overhead. A swing volley doesn't put the ball over the back fence, like a 2HBH overhead. And If you hit the backhand overhead with two hands it isn't a 1HBH overhead for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 386
|
Quote:
If you're 6'9 and standing 1 ft. from the net. lol. If you didnt lose a lot of court coverage and it was as easy to bounce balls as you're making it sound, im pretty sure that more pros would be using that fabulous 2HBH overhead. "then I swing at it like a little kid going after a piņata." as described by Pickle9 sounds more like it. I'm not knocking the guy, but at least hes being honest.
__________________
"In the 1980's two men dominated--sometimes each other, most of the time everyone else." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: On the deuce side, looking to come in
Posts: 774
|
Quote:
As to the question, posed by the OP...I'm probably more equal (equally bad?), with each wing have different "winning" capabilities. The BH volley seems to be more innate with an eh-go-for-it approach...where placement or power isn't necessarily the winning attribute. The "surprise" of it is what usually catches opponents flat-footed (remember we're talking womens 3.5 play here.
__________________
A 3.5 masquerading around with a 4.0 mask on. |
|
|
|
|
| Angle Queen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Angle Queen |
|
|
#33 |
|
New User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 80
|
I think JO11yroger is right on; in my case and based on what I have read, the BH volley is better for most players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 1,225
|
They both suck, in my case, bigtime.
I do, sincerely, think that a decent serve and volleyer will beat most anybody up to, and including, 4.0 level. Above that, the strokes are good enough that serve and volleying has to be done more sporadically, sparingly, imo, considering the power of the modern game.
__________________
65 yrs, NTRP-based, 3.0 in Tennis League Network (tennisftlauderdale.com) Play mostly at Hardy Park near downtown Fort Lauderdale. Last edited by TomT : 11-06-2012 at 08:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 832
|
What do you think causes the BH volley to become better?
__________________
Becker London Tour, 12.6oz, Wilson gut 17g 65lbs || Prince EXO3 Tour 18x20, 12.5oz, Wilson gut 16g 70lbs, S&V, DII '88-90 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great NW
Posts: 5,608
|
My BH is better defensively and my FH is better offensively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,249
|
In doubles, there is no defensive volley.
Every volley must be hit well, placed well, do try to force a weak high return. Even a great lob backhand volley, once the foursome is set near the service line, is used as an offensive shot...to win the point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great NW
Posts: 5,608
|
Uummm... what do you call a volley that the opposing netman poaches towards your chest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,249
|
Talking, reacting to the poach right at you, right?
YOU, knowing that anything weak will be put away, needs to think beforehand, "don't volley right back". You have to know the hole you're going at, or the lob volley you're gonna try. The hole is a winner, between the two opponent's or down an alley. The lob volley is also a winner attempt, as anything less will be crushed down your throat. You know what you should be doing because that scenario has happenned to you many many times before. Your partner puts up a weak groundie or volley, you are in position to EAT the ball. So you preplan what you're gonna do when opponent poaches and hits within your racket's reach. Now if the poacher is strong, can volley with pace, just turn around and give up the point. But you have reactions. If the poach is a normal volley nto your chest, you have plenty of time to reflex lob volley into the open court, then move forwards to center of service box. That lob volley is purely offensive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,797
|
"Headhunting"?
__________________
"...the human emotional system was not designed to endure the mental rigors of a tennis match." Dr. Allen Fox |
|
|
|
| tennis tom |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennis tom |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|