|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 49
|
I was wondering how close a capped mg radical would play compared to a pt57a. The mg radical has a similar mold and flex as a pt57a but what about in terms of feel?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
If you are essentially inquiring as to whether the MGRMP could serve as a reasonable (i.e. cost effective) proxy to the PT57A, that's a question that only you can answer for yourself. If I was seeking to capture the feel of a PT57A, I would much rather resort to the use of a PT280 (again, Austrian made) than a MGRMP. The MGRMP is a good racquet in it's own right - particularly as it allows for significant customization, and is a tried and tested design from a performance perspective - but it's a different animal to the Pro Tours, and to me a distant second. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,136
|
This guy above know what he is saying this is 100% same response I would give you.
Leaded yt radical mp is closest you will get to it but with slight hollow feel which you can curb by adding silicone and lead.
__________________
Too many racquets... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,134
|
One of the PT57A users on these boards did a lot of looking around for something comparable and I think that the closest he came to in something easy to get today was the Redondo MP. I think that he went back to the PT57A though.
__________________
4 x IG Prestige MP, 70 cm, 376 grams, 386 SW, ALU Power @54 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|