• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Discho Iontec 1.20, MSV Co-focus 1.18, SPPP 1.18
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2012, 03:10 AM   #1
man-walking
Semi-Pro
 
man-walking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 521
Default Discho Iontec 1.20, MSV Co-focus 1.18, SPPP 1.18

I wonder if someone can give me some opinion by which characteristics and differences emerges among these strings and experiences about, I'm in search for a not too cheap or too pricey co-poly round (not shaped) to be used in fullbed, maybe something around 50-60€ a 200mt reel.
I like elastic polys (not soft but I'd say elastic, maybe similar as Head Sonic) but not too lose and good for hard strokes exchanges, also a bit of crispness is welcome, smooth surface for free "snap-back effect", playable for the longest possible time, thin almost as 1.18-1.20.
Not a string breaker, 20 hours SPPP 1.18 on a Blade 98.

Effective playabilty in time is more important for me than just the single tension retention factor per se, as there are some strings that holds well but get very stiff in few hours and others that loose progressively but retain some dynamics and playability.

I play with a Blade 98 BLX (18x20), mostly baseline game, fast and long swing, flat FH, topspin FH but mostly driven for a low trajectory (a bit more forward swing than a circular low-to-high typical of the pure spinners), topspin one handed BH, low and driven slice BH (one of my few weapons).

I know well SPPP 1.18 as it has been my widely used string for many years, I like its control, spin, dynamic response... in some sense also the feel.

Actual I play with Signum Pro Thunderstorm 1.24 @ 22v/21o Kg (now 21/20), but shaped string design make the stringbed playing stiffer, also the excessive grip on the ball make my slice unconsistent in performing/feeling and TS seems stiffer by nature, especially after 6-8h of play get even more, I don't like this.
__________________
Wilson BLX Blade 98 / Signum Pro Thunderstorm 1.24 @ 21/20 kg
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
man-walking is offline   Reply With Quote
man-walking
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by man-walking
Old 11-26-2012, 03:41 PM   #2
lynnbart
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 243
Default

We use the Iontec Black as a poly main alot. It is easy to handle, doesn't coil much, plays great, and is very easy on the wallet especially with free shipping.

When stringing, it is very elastic and on a dropweight it almost seems like you wait forever for the bar to stop moving. Some stretch a little and just stop, but not the Iontec. It is also a very smooth string that doesn't notch very fast.

I'ved used MSV strings and they are great as well....never have tried a Signum yet.
lynnbart is offline   Reply With Quote
lynnbart
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by lynnbart
Old 11-27-2012, 12:10 AM   #3
man-walking
Semi-Pro
 
man-walking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnbart View Post
When stringing, it is very elastic and on a dropweight it almost seems like you wait forever for the bar to stop moving. Some stretch a little and just stop, but not the Iontec.
Mmmm... that reminds me Topspin Poly Polar which I have strung and play in past, hope that plays better in general especially on hard strokes, but I guess I can't pretend much of that from elastic polys...

Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnbart View Post
It is also a very smooth string that doesn't notch very fast.
That's good and it's positive when mains can move freely between crosses even after notching, without too much resistance. (typical of modern co-poly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnbart View Post
I'ved used MSV strings and they are great as well....never have tried a Signum yet.
What about Co.-Focus vs Iontec in thin gauge?

Thank you for your help!
__________________
Wilson BLX Blade 98 / Signum Pro Thunderstorm 1.24 @ 21/20 kg
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
man-walking is offline   Reply With Quote
man-walking
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by man-walking
Old 11-27-2012, 12:31 AM   #4
Say Chi Sin Lo
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by man-walking View Post

What about Co.-Focus vs Iontec in thin gauge?

Thank you for your help!
I've used them both in crosses as a gut/poly hybrid. But aside from the crosses, I kept all everything else equal. So, whatever differences I felt, I can say it was the property of the crosses, and here is my opinion.

They're similar enough where on a blind test, it's hard to tell the difference. You mentioned you like crispness, then you'll be happy to know that I found Co-Focus played crisper than Iontec. Having said that, they're both very soft polys.

Iontec = Softer/mushier
Co-Focus = Crisper (but still soft!)
__________________
Wilson BLX Six.One Tour 90. 374g, 8pts HL, SW=355 (according to TW's calculator)
Say Chi Sin Lo is offline   Reply With Quote
Say Chi Sin Lo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo
Old 11-27-2012, 06:42 AM   #5
man-walking
Semi-Pro
 
man-walking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 521
Default

SayChi, which one you felt playing better for longer time
__________________
Wilson BLX Blade 98 / Signum Pro Thunderstorm 1.24 @ 21/20 kg
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
man-walking is offline   Reply With Quote
man-walking
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by man-walking
Old 11-27-2012, 08:29 PM   #6
fortun8son
Hall Of Fame
 
fortun8son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Desert
Posts: 2,996
Default

The Iontec Black is softer than the Salmon.
__________________
Neos 1000, Eagnas Combo 810(home),Prince 5000(work)
Member USRSA
fortun8son is offline   Reply With Quote
fortun8son
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fortun8son
Old 11-27-2012, 09:49 PM   #7
parasailing
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,559
Default

Do you guys feel a trampoline effect using such thin strings?
parasailing is offline   Reply With Quote
parasailing
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by parasailing
Old 11-27-2012, 10:03 PM   #8
fortun8son
Hall Of Fame
 
fortun8son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Desert
Posts: 2,996
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parasailing View Post
Do you guys feel a trampoline effect using such thin strings?
Good question.
I would think that you could up the tension a bit with the thin guys.

Edit: wrong thread.
__________________
Neos 1000, Eagnas Combo 810(home),Prince 5000(work)
Member USRSA

Last edited by fortun8son : 11-29-2012 at 12:18 PM.
fortun8son is offline   Reply With Quote
fortun8son
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fortun8son
Old 11-27-2012, 10:39 PM   #9
Say Chi Sin Lo
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by man-walking View Post
SayChi, which one you felt playing better for longer time
I don't think I can answer that for you, because it was a gut/poly hybrid. Whatever deadness over time would have been masked by the gut mains.

Sorry about that.
__________________
Wilson BLX Six.One Tour 90. 374g, 8pts HL, SW=355 (according to TW's calculator)
Say Chi Sin Lo is offline   Reply With Quote
Say Chi Sin Lo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo
Old 11-28-2012, 09:19 AM   #10
man-walking
Semi-Pro
 
man-walking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Italia
Posts: 521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parasailing View Post
Do you guys feel a trampoline effect using such thin strings?
That's strictly connected with the openess of stringbed you play with, for ex. 98" 16x19 with 1.25 is pretty good, but with a 98" 18x20 1.18 plays nicer than thicker ones, you have both feel and the consistency of a dense pattern.
__________________
Wilson BLX Blade 98 / Signum Pro Thunderstorm 1.24 @ 21/20 kg
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication
man-walking is offline   Reply With Quote
man-walking
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by man-walking
Old 11-29-2012, 03:51 AM   #11
GlenK
Semi-Pro
 
GlenK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: St. Augustine, FL
Posts: 594
Default

^^Agree with that. In my 18x20 I do not get the trampoline effect with MSV-CF.. I don't know about the other two.
__________________
Head YouTek Prestige MP (18x20) - Wilson Nat Gut 17/MSV Co-Focus 1.18
(55/54) - Gamma X-Els
GlenK is offline   Reply With Quote
GlenK
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by GlenK
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Discho Iontec 1.20, MSV Co-focus 1.18, SPPP 1.18

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse