• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Any thought on the new Dunlop bio m3.0?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2013, 07:34 PM   #1
JAT
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 15
Post Any thought on the new Dunlop bio m3.0?

How is the m3.0 compare to the old bio 300?
JAT is offline   Reply With Quote
JAT
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JAT
Old 05-13-2013, 07:55 AM   #2
LeeD
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
Default

Looking at specs, a slightly wider top of the head, a slightly firmer feel, has 10 points more swingweight, for less manueverability and more plowthrough.
LeeD is offline   Reply With Quote
LeeD
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LeeD
Old 05-13-2013, 11:53 AM   #3
JackB1
Legend
 
JackB1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 8,271
Default

It was very disappointing. Very tinny and pingy feeling. Feels like he frame is made out of balsa wood.
__________________
Wilson Black Blade 104 - NXT Tour / Copoly at 55/51
JackB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
JackB1
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JackB1
Old 05-13-2013, 01:05 PM   #4
LeeD
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
Default

Sorta agree, the demo I tried felt tinny and light, sweetspot small, but it was a F3T.
My Bio300T would feel like that, if I strung at 58 lbs.
Lucky for me, I spec'ed 52 from TW here, and it's solid with 12" of lead at 12-2.
My bud's Bio300T feels like a toy POS, but he's a slicer dicer and likes the firm feel.
Strung softer at 47 or so, and hitting through the ball with a FAST long stroke, these rackets must feel like a hot blade slicing thru butter.
LeeD is offline   Reply With Quote
LeeD
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LeeD
Old 05-13-2013, 01:21 PM   #5
neverstopplaying
Professional
 
neverstopplaying's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 929
Default

Would't play this stock but with leather grip and 6gm lead total in hoop:

great control
great spin for 18m
best plow through-to-weight ratio
quite forgiving on off center and defensive shots
more powerful than 4d-300 but very controllable power with even response
one of the best serving racquets I've used
better overall, including feel, than my previous blade 2013-18x20

I've now switched to clay for the summer and changed to full poly string setup @45/43.
__________________
Dunlop F 3.0 Tour 18x20 (6gm lead and leather); I think.. VS Team @54 - Lux 4G @50 will work
neverstopplaying is offline   Reply With Quote
neverstopplaying
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by neverstopplaying
Old 05-13-2013, 02:59 PM   #6
JAT
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 15
Default

Thanks for the input. It seems the sweetspot is smaller than the previous version. I wish I can demo it in Australia.
JAT is offline   Reply With Quote
JAT
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JAT
Old 05-13-2013, 03:29 PM   #7
LeeD
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
Default

Sweetspot size totally depends on grip size and string tension.
Most U guys want to use 3/8 grips, and 58+ string tension. That shrinks the size of the sweetspot.
When Fed and Nadal use small grips, they counter with bigger swings and heavier rackets....and a dose of added skill. Yet they string around 50 lbs.
LeeD is offline   Reply With Quote
LeeD
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LeeD
Old 05-13-2013, 04:36 PM   #8
JAT
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 15
Post

Hi Lee,
Could you please explain to me why if you reduce the grip size can increase the sweetspot area?
I thought if you use smaller grip size than what you suppose to use can cause tennis elbow?


Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeD View Post
Sweetspot size totally depends on grip size and string tension.
Most U guys want to use 3/8 grips, and 58+ string tension. That shrinks the size of the sweetspot.
When Fed and Nadal use small grips, they counter with bigger swings and heavier rackets....and a dose of added skill. Yet they string around 50 lbs.
JAT is offline   Reply With Quote
JAT
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JAT
Old 05-13-2013, 05:00 PM   #9
LeeD
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
Default

Try holding a pencil sized racket handle. It will twist in your hand on any kind of off center hit.
Now try holding the barrel end of a baseball bat. You never feel twisting at all.
What is our definition of "small sweetspot"? It means the ball hit off center really twists in the hand.
LeeD is offline   Reply With Quote
LeeD
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LeeD
Old 05-13-2013, 05:31 PM   #10
JAT
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 15
Default

Hi LeeD, cheers for the explanation in that case if you use a bigger grip it should increase the stability and should not twist in the hand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeD View Post
Try holding a pencil sized racket handle. It will twist in your hand on any kind of off center hit.
Now try holding the barrel end of a baseball bat. You never feel twisting at all.
What is our definition of "small sweetspot"? It means the ball hit off center really twists in the hand.
JAT is offline   Reply With Quote
JAT
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JAT
Old 05-13-2013, 05:35 PM   #11
LeeD
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
Default

It increases non twist until you notice a certain lack of fluidity and movement of the wrist, on some groundies and most serves.
I'm 5'11" and 150 lbs, very thin build. I use a 4 5/8th size handle. Possibly because I"m old school, possibly because I play net more than half the points, and possibly because I'm stubborn and pigheaded.
I find smaller grips like 1/2's with overgrip are easier to switch grips, faster to, but serve the same and have more wrist power, which can lead to inconsistencies.
I don't need more power. I need control and repeatibility. My power is adaquate up to 5.0 doubles, but my control is no where near.
LeeD is offline   Reply With Quote
LeeD
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LeeD
Old 05-13-2013, 06:53 PM   #12
JAT
New User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 15
Post

According to Dunlop 2013 tennis catalogue “The fully re-engineered frame shape of the 3.0 range features a 15% rounder more eliptical head shape than the previous 300 model to enlarge the sweet spot of the racket.”
I guess this is just a marketing hype.
Lucky I haven’t order the m3.0
JAT is offline   Reply With Quote
JAT
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JAT
Old 05-14-2013, 11:36 AM   #13
LeeD
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,066
Default

Can you read post #2 again?
There is already a post on this subject, and one of the 4.5 level TW posters wholeheartedly endorses the F3T over the Bio300T, saying the wider top of the hoop and heavier SW are contributing factors.
LeeD is offline   Reply With Quote
LeeD
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by LeeD
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page Any thought on the new Dunlop bio m3.0?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:35 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse