roger federer racquet

[DownTheLineWith90]

Originally Posted by lidoazndiabloboi

looks like federer went back to ALU rough crosses


Photo courtesy of Getty Images

Yeah, that is really interesting..
I wonder why Wilson suddenly changed it.
It looks much cleaner, in my opinion.
Wish I could trade my old ones to these new ones..

[Borrelli]

Originally Posted by lidoazndiabloboi

anyone notice fed's newer cosmetic of his PSBLX90. It says Ninety near the throat area instead of SIX.ONE 90.
The BLX logo on the side of the racket looks a little different too


Photo courtesy of Getty Images

That doesn't look like ALU to me? When did he ever switch from using it anyway?

[King_roger]

Originally Posted by Roddickulous

Well, Nostradamus would agree with me on this.. the real reason for the Gilette Roger Federer Tour is because the world ends on 12/21/12

hahaha this post made my day !

[svarthofde]

i think this is the racquet.


at first i thought it was fotoshoped by wilson ( the photo is from their facebook page) but it seems it's the real deal

[Homeboy Hotel]

It is photoshoped, this is the REAL photo from Roland Garros...

Notice the writing on the frame is both different and written the other way.

[King_roger]

Ok, now I am confused!
If this PJ is only a photoshop:

Originally Posted by svarthofde

i think this is the racquet.


at first i thought it was fotoshoped by wilson ( the photo is from their facebook page) but it seems it's the real deal

And this is the "real deal":

Originally Posted by Homeboy Hotel

It is photoshoped, this is the REAL photo from Roland Garros...

Notice the writing on the frame is both different and written the other way.

Why was Roger using a racket with the cosmetic like in the first pic at the exhibitions in South America ???

[svarthofde]

i think they photoshoped the new PJ in an old picture of Fed's because they posted it before the South America Tour.

[JoelDali]

You can plainly see the PJ in this video. Rogi gives this lame chick a non Basalt infused version of the K90 PS PJ.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-3MZKUJztI&sns=em

[Homeboy Hotel]

Originally Posted by King_roger

Why was Roger using a racket with the cosmetic like in the first pic at the exhibitions in South America ???

This time last year, Federer practised during the off-season with his 'new' PJ sticks.

See, Priority 1's twitter from December **2011**

Originally Posted by /

Strung up some practice sticks already. Too short an off season. -Ron

For 2012, the same thing is being repeated, but this year he's not in Dubai practising with new new sticks in his private court - he's in South America practising with them during his exhibitions.

[Mick3391]

Originally Posted by Wilsonbro11

Does roger federer use a new racquet every match?

I was talking to my son about this. Wilson, to make money has to come out with a new, advanced model for everyone to buy. Does this mean Fed says "Well I like the K-90 but we should change this and that", or like others have said does he keep the same raquet then just go along with the new paint job?

It seems that someone of Feds meticulous desire for exact specs, he wouldn't just change every few years.

I mean they are all very similar, my BLX 6.1 90 plays just like the new Prostaff 90 (New one is a little more head light I think), but it's not really a factor.

I don't know, but it just seems Fed is not going to change racquets in conjunction with Wilsons marketing plans.

[chris_short1]

Obviously he updates his racket abit, I wouldn't say he uses the exact same frame as in 2002 but of course he got the updates (blx, (K)ontrol, etc
to the rackets. But all in pretty much the same frame. just which the slight change in technologies.

[Povl Carstensen]

Originally Posted by chris_short1

Obviously he updates his racket abit, I wouldn't say he uses the exact same frame as in 2002 but of course he got the updates (blx, (K)ontrol, etc
to the rackets. But all in pretty much the same frame. just which the slight change in technologies.

I can not see why that should be "obvious" and "of course".