Why Roger will win the 2013 AO

[abmk]

.....never mind .....

[The_Order]

Originally Posted by abmk

A better chance than nadal for sure >> who has zero chance ......

LOL what's it got to do with Nadal who's not even playing? Fed's playing and still against Djoker his chance = 0% hahahahahahaha

NOT 1 set against Novak on plexicushion and now that he's even older he's going to beat him??? LOL dumb **** logic.

Anyway, Fed's not making it to the quarters this year. Get ready

[boredone3456]

If he gets the same draw he did at the USO his chances go down exponentially. Although if he got Tipsy in the QF and Ferrer in the semis than he has a shot.

[forzamilan90]

Originally Posted by The_Order

He's not beating Djoker. Not a chance......

that's what they said at Wimbledon 2012

[Povl Carstensen]

Still it is hard to argue with this kind of reasoning:

Originally Posted by The_Order

against Djoker his chance = 0% hahahahahahaha

[Cup8489]

Originally Posted by The_Order

LOL what's it got to do with Nadal who's not even playing? Fed's playing and still against Djoker his chance = 0% hahahahahahaha

NOT 1 set against Novak on plexicushion and now that he's even older he's going to beat him??? LOL dumb **** logic.

Anyway, Fed's not making it to the quarters this year. Get ready

Let's make a bet. If you win, you can determine what my payout is. If I win, you leave the boards. I wager Federer will make AT LEAST the quarters. Naturally you believe he will not. What should my payout be?

Let's make a bet, you're so confident.

[tudwell]

Originally Posted by 90's Clay

Nothing happened.. They put a roof on thus making grass faster which was perfect conditions for Roger. (he may not even have beaten Nole without the roof, I don't know)


Australia and a indoor grass court is night and day. Grass (especially indoors grass, is Nole's worst surface and Roger's best.). Australia is Nole's best surface by far and one of Roger's worst now.

Would you prefer they didn't have the roof and players had to play or at least finish multiple matches in a single day just to cram it all into two weeks? I have a feeling there would be just as many excuses for Federer winning in that scenario, if not more.

[tudwell]

Originally Posted by The_Order

LOL what's it got to do with Nadal who's not even playing? Fed's playing and still against Djoker his chance = 0% hahahahahahaha

Is that why he leads the head-to-head?

[canny]

Honestly.... Can you guys be realistic. Obiously we cant count Roger out he's amazing. But on the note of Wimbledon 2012 yes they said Nole had it but come on. Thats Noles worst surface by far and Rogers best. The AO is where Nole excels. So im giving it to him.

[abmk]

Originally Posted by The_Order

LOL what's it got to do with Nadal who's not even playing? Fed's playing and still against Djoker his chance = 0% hahahahahahaha

NOT 1 set against Novak on plexicushion and now that he's even older he's going to beat him??? LOL dumb **** logic.

Anyway, Fed's not making it to the quarters this year. Get ready

and will you disappear forever from here if he does beat novak ? LOL !

I already said novak is the favourite ...

and yeah anyways nadal isn't even going to make it to 1R @ the AO ...... get ready ..... oh wait ....you already are

again, you are just trolling here because of your frustration that your favourite nadal is out .....go try somewhere else ....

[abmk]

Originally Posted by forzamilan90

that's what they said at Wimbledon 2012

and at FO 2011 .....

[Dedans Penthouse]

Originally Posted by Say Chi Sin Lo

Or are you just like every other idiot in this section, making broad assumptions about X players like you're their siblings?

Whoa! Say It Ain't So Lo!

where's the love? on-topic:

Djoko's the odds on AO fav no doubt. But when you're Federer and you've done everything, fought and won in every type of situation, and are considered by many as the GOAT, even if your best days are behind you, you always have a chance, whatever the odds. This isn't just any player ... and Federer still has enough 'physical' in him that on any given day he's capable of pulling out his "almost-A+" game which might be enough to match Djoko on an off day ... who knows? jm2cts

[Candide]

Originally Posted by veroniquem

And Djoko will break a leg??

http://www.theage.com.au/sport/tenni...231-2c2pr.html

Weirder things have happened. The way Djokovic and Nadal play submits their bodies to a higher chance of injury not to mention this thing called life in which stuff happens.

[smoledman]

Originally Posted by canny

Honestly.... Can you guys be realistic. Obiously we cant count Roger out he's amazing. But on the note of Wimbledon 2012 yes they said Nole had it but come on. Thats Noles worst surface by far and Rogers best. The AO is where Nole excels. So im giving it to him.

Nole was defending Wimbledon champion just 6 months ago.

[kidbourbon]

Originally Posted by Mike Sams

Nobody is beating Novak Djokovic on the AO surface. Not even god-level Rafa who is grinding and defending his butt off!

He hit the nail on the head.

[Prisoner of Birth]

Originally Posted by kidbourbon

He hit the nail on the head.

He didn't. Hards are Nadal's worst surface. And Federer's second best (relative to the field).

Not saying Federer is gonna beat him, though. I do think it's extremely unlikely.

[kidbourbon]

Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth

He didn't. Hards are Nadal's worst surface. And Federer's second best (relative to the field).

Not saying Federer is gonna beat him, though. I do think it's extremely unlikely.

Are you saying that Federer is a better player on the AO surface than Nadal?

Because I have some evidence that refutes such a statement.

[Prisoner of Birth]

Originally Posted by kidbourbon

Are you saying that Federer is a better player on the AO surface than Nadal?

Because I have some evidence that refutes such a statement.

Course he is. And don't bring up the freaking head-to-head. Federer was past his prime and then there's the match-up.

[kidbourbon]

Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth

Course he is. And don't bring up the freaking head-to-head. Federer was past his prime and then there's the match-up.

If he was past his prime then, then he's past his prime now.

And if you're making the argument that Federer is a better player at the AO despite the fact that Nadal beat him in four sets last year in the semi (and other times before that), I'm gonna pull out the common sense card. No no, he's not.

[smoledman]

Even past his prime, Federer is still an awesome player.