• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Did anyone check out how ugly Gulbis's new forehand is?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2013, 07:01 AM   #1
Clay lover
Hall Of Fame
 
Clay lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,805
Default Did anyone check out how ugly Gulbis's new forehand is?

I mean, let's disregard results for the moment, just focus on the sheer HIDEOUSNESS of that stroke.

It's definitely one of the ugliest forehands I have seen, looks like one of those wacky topspin 4 forehand animations rather than a pro stroke.

2010 forehand
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri7pVMr4HnA

2012 forehand
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo7j9G3C8Qc

Why, Gulbis, why?
(Question asked from a pure aesthetic point of view)
Clay lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Clay lover
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Clay lover
Old 01-01-2013, 07:03 AM   #2
Clarky21
G.O.A.T.
 
Clarky21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 10,551
Default

Yeah, this has been discusssed on here before. His forehand is awful now. I am not sure what he's trying to accomplish by changing it to the hideous style it is now.
__________________
"Hopefully the Church of Fed will have mercy on my soul". - Namelessone
"We are in the Fed warehouse(known as Nadal haters united)". - Namelessone
Clarky21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Clarky21
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Clarky21
Old 01-01-2013, 07:05 AM   #3
SQA333
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 607
Default

I don't know what he's trying to achieve by INCREASING the length of his backswing. Sure, the old forehand was inconsistent, but at least it had more power. This one is useless.
SQA333 is offline   Reply With Quote
SQA333
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by SQA333
Old 01-01-2013, 07:08 AM   #4
Mike Sams
Hall Of Fame
 
Mike Sams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,500
Default

What difference does it make? It's not like he was accomplishing big things on the tour even with his old forehand. Still losing most of his matches anyway.
Mike Sams is offline   Reply With Quote
Mike Sams
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Mike Sams
Old 01-01-2013, 07:09 AM   #5
Clay lover
Hall Of Fame
 
Clay lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,805
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Sams View Post
What difference does it make? It's not like he was accomplishing big things on the tour even with his old forehand. Still losing most of his matches anyway.
If you lose anyway, you might as well lose looking good.
Clay lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Clay lover
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Clay lover
Old 01-01-2013, 07:13 AM   #6
Clay lover
Hall Of Fame
 
Clay lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,805
Default

His new reverse forehand looks exactly like Top Spin 4's rendition of Nadal's forehand.

One word:hideous :S

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc5phchkobQ

Last edited by Clay lover : 01-01-2013 at 07:20 AM.
Clay lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Clay lover
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Clay lover
Old 01-01-2013, 07:14 AM   #7
Joko
New User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 39
Default

Interesting topic.

Does anybody know when he started to change his motion?

All I know he started to work with Guenter Bresnik right before Wimbledon 2012 if I'm not mistaken. Bresnik is from Austria and the former coach of Stefan Koubek and current coach of Dominic Thiem.

I'm not sure if they still work together.

Here is a video where he is hitting a couple of forehands.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...B4PENnkw#t=32s
Joko is offline   Reply With Quote
Joko
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Joko
Old 01-01-2013, 07:27 AM   #8
TTMR
Hall Of Fame
 
TTMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clay lover View Post
I mean, let's disregard results for the moment, just focus on the sheer HIDEOUSNESS of that stroke.

It's definitely one of the ugliest forehands I have seen, looks like one of those wacky topspin 4 forehand animations rather than a pro stroke.

2010 forehand
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri7pVMr4HnA

2012 forehand
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo7j9G3C8Qc

Why, Gulbis, why?
(Question asked from a pure aesthetic point of view)
Only a few full forehands were shown in the highlights of the second video. The forehand motion does not remain a constant even among a single player; it changes to some extent given the height of the ball. Hard to compare a match played on clay with a high bounce against a player known for his spin generation (Federer), with a match played on fresh first round grass with a low bounce against a player known for relatively flat trajectory strokes (Berdych). Not enough evidence to conclude he's definitively altered his stroke. You'll need slow motion practice videos from each 'forehand era' to demonstrate your claim.

But more to the point, is a long backswing always 'ugly', aesthetically? People here seem to think so, yet they also adored the look of Gonzalez's masterful forehand:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ8K6boqFT0
__________________
Bills looking good, will win Super Bowl.
TTMR is offline   Reply With Quote
TTMR
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TTMR
Old 01-01-2013, 07:34 AM   #9
Clay lover
Hall Of Fame
 
Clay lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,805
Default

A long backswing can sometimes look good, yeah.

Well, the judgment of ugliness is subjective and spontaneous...but wow his new forehand, just wow.
Clay lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Clay lover
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Clay lover
Old 01-02-2013, 04:52 AM   #10
dominikk1985
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,812
Default

I think this is a very good FH mechanically. he has a sort of strange loop but he creates a lot of racket lag and racket head speed. the FH is not the reason for his struggles
dominikk1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
dominikk1985
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dominikk1985
Old 02-23-2013, 10:22 PM   #11
Sid_Vicious
Legend
 
Sid_Vicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: A Town Called Malice
Posts: 7,182
Default




Just thought I leave this in this thread....
Sid_Vicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Sid_Vicious
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Sid_Vicious
Old 02-23-2013, 10:44 PM   #12
The Meat
Professional
 
The Meat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,309
Default

Edit: Ignore comment, my eyes were playing tricks with me while looking at his string pattern.

Last edited by The Meat : 02-23-2013 at 10:49 PM.
The Meat is online now   Reply With Quote
The Meat
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by The Meat
Old 02-24-2013, 07:03 AM   #13
TTMR
Hall Of Fame
 
TTMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,560
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid_Vicious View Post



Just thought I leave this in this thread....
I don't really understand the objection. The forehand is one of the few shots where players can differentiate themselves from others. Most players have a unique aspect of their takeback, swing length, and so on. The game would become rather dull if everyone had a nice, clean textbook Federer, Ferrer or Agassi forehand.

The variation among forehand styles (while of course, the fundamentals remain the same between all professional players) also helps recreational players, because they can choose more than one pro to copy from. If one approach doesn't work, they can switch to another pro's approach. They can also develop their own style, again so long as it does not compromise the fundamentals. Pointing to the diversity of pro level forehands is also a good defense against the money-grubbing coach that wants to "re-build" your stroke, requiring several additional lessons.
__________________
Bills looking good, will win Super Bowl.
TTMR is offline   Reply With Quote
TTMR
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TTMR
Old 02-24-2013, 11:11 AM   #14
stringertom
Hall Of Fame
 
stringertom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,968
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid_Vicious View Post



Just thought I leave this in this thread....
Indelible in my brain is my first teaching pro's mantra to me while drilling me on FHs: "Keep your elbow tucked in!"
__________________
"I am easily satisfied by the very best." Sir Winston Churchill; ALLEZ ROGI!
stringertom is offline   Reply With Quote
stringertom
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by stringertom
Old 02-24-2013, 02:21 PM   #15
Relinquis
Hall Of Fame
 
Relinquis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On the courts; hard & clay ...
Posts: 4,326
Default

no idea why he made the change. is it and attempt to hit more spin and less flat/through?

i was discussing this with a friend and was making fun of the exaggerated left arm movement, until she mentioned that i kinda do the same thing with my forehand...
__________________
Disclaimer: I'm NOT a coach...
Real tennis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDqnkLJ9BtM
Relinquis is offline   Reply With Quote
Relinquis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Relinquis
Old 02-24-2013, 02:58 PM   #16
merwy
Hall Of Fame
 
merwy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,594
Default

Damn you people are a bunch of girls.. Who cares if it doesn't look "pretty"? I don't think Gulbis himself changed it because of the way it looks. I think efficacy is the most important (and the only important..) factor here. He says he will train more and be more dedicated so perhaps his new forehand is something that will help him produce some results this year. He looked very good in Rotterdam.
Also, there is nothing wrong with a big backswing. It helps you set up for a bigger shot. It's just that I have no idea what the hell he's trying to do with his left arm. But I'm sure there's some thought behind it, he's not just making up random movements just for heck of it.
merwy is online now   Reply With Quote
merwy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by merwy
Old 02-24-2013, 03:42 PM   #17
matchmaker
Hall Of Fame
 
matchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,024
Default

It is definitely an ugly motion, but I think it was actually designed to tone down his forehand, and maybe it helps him in that way. Gulbis forehand was a very powerful shot, but it was so powerful that he went for winners all the time and hit a lot of UEs. This new movement has such a long takeback that, unless it is a ball that sits up, he will normally not go for a winner.
I just think that this might help his game more tactically than technically in that it limits his choices. Gulbis could play so many shots that it drove himself crazy
__________________
"Most of us believe in trying to make other people happy only if they can be happy in ways which we approve." Robert S. Lynd
matchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
matchmaker
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by matchmaker
Old 02-24-2013, 03:54 PM   #18
Power Player
G.O.A.T.
 
Power Player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On my iPhone
Posts: 13,562
Default

I know a guy from his country who hits with him and Gulbis told him back then that he was having mental blocks with his forehand and was slicing way too much.

Went and saw him in Miami and he was killing the ball. So I think he got it figured back out.
__________________
🐐ing
Power Player is offline   Reply With Quote
Power Player
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Power Player
Old 02-24-2013, 04:15 PM   #19
Relinquis
Hall Of Fame
 
Relinquis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On the courts; hard & clay ...
Posts: 4,326
Default

i would be more than happy to have his old forehand, even though it seems we use different grips...
__________________
Disclaimer: I'm NOT a coach...
Real tennis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDqnkLJ9BtM
Relinquis is offline   Reply With Quote
Relinquis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Relinquis
Old 02-24-2013, 04:47 PM   #20
db10s
Hall Of Fame
 
db10s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: S. FL
Posts: 1,974
Default

It looked a little better today in Delray, where he has to play qualifiers at an event that he won a few years ago.
__________________
Dunlop D-Squad Member... So I'm biased towards Dunlop.
Biomimetic Max 200G x3 and a few others...
db10s is offline   Reply With Quote
db10s
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by db10s
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > General Pro Player Discussion
Reload this Page Did anyone check out how ugly Gulbis's new forehand is?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse