|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#281 |
|
New User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 66
|
Whats the difference in strategy and tactics?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: soCal
Posts: 1,315
|
Until few years ago, players had real weapons and also weakness -- take champs from last gen..
(Rog is exception here.. considering him from the last gen) Pete: weapon-serve, fh / weakness-bh Andre: weapon-fh, bh / weakness-serve Rog: weapon-serve, fh / weakness-bh But as we get to the next gen (Nadal, Novak, Murray... plus other top pros), we seen a major change in that dynamic... that strength/weakness gap is getting thinner and thinner.. they're well rounded. Can we say that strategy* is.. having a plan (tactics) to 1. playing to your opponent weakness 2. force your opponent play to your strength Now, with players having very little weakness, how can one have a set strategy? ![]() So, IMO this old definition of strategy is changing (evolving).... Fitness "be really fit to outlast your opponent" is part of new strategy. There will still be the classic strategy* (as defined above).. but it is used a little against non top players who still have some weakness. But against the top players, it is replaced with a new type of strategy.. which is very dynamic one which has many mini strategies depending on the situations (or how the opponent is playing that day) |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|