|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,198
|
I am referring to the current ATP and WTA No 1's - Novak and Azarenka.
Their behavior on and off court does not exemplify the classy, elegant sport of tennis. I am talking about things like - Novak mimicking Serena on court (tucking towels inside his apparel) - Azarenka Shrieking - Novak ripping his shirt after wins - Azarenka walking into the court like a hippie girl with an ipod listening to rap songs tuning out the crowd and not acknowledging the fans when she comes in - Azarenka MTO - Novak and Azarenka have no clues or perspective about past tennis greats, icons or records ( interview question about Gussie Moran is one example) I think this is the reason why players like Federer, Nadal, Kim Clijsters are loved by fans and when they are at the top, the sport receives a huge image boost because they carry themselves so well on and off the court. I think Murray to some extent will help the ATP as he matures , but i think WTA is in for big trouble unless Radwanska picks up. What do you think ? Last edited by tennisaddict : 01-25-2013 at 06:41 PM. |
|
|
|
| tennisaddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisaddict |
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,153
|
The image crisis was what you see as the good old days, when tennis was a sedate country club sport. The peak growth in tennis was when bad boys like Connors, McEnroe and Nastase were active. People like antics, and the fact that Djokovic has a sense of humor and some enthusiasm is not what I would call an image crisis but rather an image change. And a healthy one. Athletes need not behave like choir boys. The most successful sports leagues in recent decades have been the NFL and NBA. Have you noticed that many of the players in those leagues don't behave like choir boys?
__________________
"I may be synthetic but I'm not stupid" Bishop, in "Aliens" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,223
|
Could be worse. Imagine if Nadal was number one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,198
|
Quote:
I think Borg exemplified the class, Edberg and Sampras carried it forward and Federer and Nadal stretched it a lot. But I am unsure what is going to happen now. |
|
|
|
|
| tennisaddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennisaddict |
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: expanding my Ignore List
Posts: 3,376
|
I think your trolling needs work. Or else you need to learn a lot more about the history of the classy, elegant sport of tennis.
__________________
A Head Microgel Radical, a Neos 1k, and a Silent Partner Star. Life is good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: IL
Posts: 1,151
|
I think audiences these days are into bigger than life personalities. People don't want to be bored. I loved Edberg and his class, and I also love Djokovic and his antics.
|
|
|
|
| librarysteg |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by librarysteg |
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,538
|
Is that really any different then Fed whining like a little baby out there on the court when things aren't going his way and rarely giving the opponent credit for playing a great match.
Sure some of these players are a little over the top with their antics like Nole but its entertaining |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Jesusland
Posts: 930
|
Why do some people have a problem with Novak ripping his shirt off?
__________________
[ Djokovic | Murray | Wozniacki ] |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 360
|
I don't think it's necessarily a problem but I do think the number one ranking isn't as significant as it once was. IMO the number one player should always be the most important player on tour- i.e. the axis on which the tour runs. But because we have Rog and when Rafa comes back Djoko doesn't get the attention befitting the number 1. I think Rafa and especially Fed's years at number 1 was the ideal situation in that when people thought of tennis, they thought of the number 1 player- Rafa/Roger. Djoko isn't as charismatic as Fedal and in a way will never ever really escape from their shadow. But it's not necessarily a bad thing either
__________________
GODMODEYEYE FOR CYGS 2014!!!!! |
|
|
|
| Jeffrey573639 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Jeffrey573639 |
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,538
|
Let's not start with a who's more well behaved. Tennis isn't the aristocratic grace sport some ****s still think it is.
Federer: swore at an umpire in the 09 USO final has trash talked Murray and Djokovic at times with a bit of mind games made excuses for defeats against Nadal in 2008 and Wimbledon 2010 and to countless other guys hes lost to over the years (How often does Fed lose and there isn't some excuse already planted in his brain?) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Legend
|
I, for one, despise the nice, country club feel that the game still has at times. I blame Roger Federer and Tatsuma Ito.
__________________
"It was like watching Dolgopolov, except that it all made sense"- Mikhail Youzhny on Evgeny Donskoy |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 308
|
get off your high horse and stop looking down your nose at others. as far as i'm concerned.. anything that can separate tennis from the classy, elegant, unathletic, gentlemen's game stereotype is a good thing for tennis' popularity.
|
|
|
|
| KineticChain |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by KineticChain |
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 582
|
|
|
|
|
| Achilles82 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Achilles82 |
|
|
#16 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 296
|
I think both are fine as #1's. They're obviously not as popular as Fed/Nadal or attract as much attention as Shara/Williams but they're certainly no 'disgrace'.
Tennis will likely get a boost in the media when Murray reaches the #1 ranking. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,369
|
Azarenka is dreadful but Djok is wonderful for tennis - he's a fun guy, gracious, generous.
|
|
|
|
| Paul Murphy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Paul Murphy |
|
|
#18 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 180
|
|
|
|
|
| Lovely_Bone |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lovely_Bone |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
http://youtu.be/G3ynYHHH9e0 As for the subject at hand. No, there is no image crisis for tennis. Some people who love Federer's style are having a personal crisis as they realise he's not going to be at the top for ever, and the people who are beating him have their own personalities and characteristics. Just as some people adore Fed's elite country club style, others find it a turn-off, so it's a good thing that the top players have different personalities and that it changes periodically. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,778
|
What about Fed throwing Andy a big F-bomb last night? Ugly Roger! He sure isn't taking this decline thing well.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|