|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 77
|
I've never tried this, and maybe if I did I'd understand better, but I don't understand why people choose to hybrid gut in the mains and poly in the crosses. What is the desired effect of gut in the mains and poly in the crosses that cannot otherwise be achieved with another combination? To me, it just "feels" counterintuitive since you're spending 20-30 dollars on a half set of gut where its primary playing characteristics are likely overshadowed by the choice of string in the mains.
The uses cases that I can think of: 1. Does the poly in the crosses stiffen up the gut? If so, why not use a synthetic that plays a little crisper than gut? 2. Does poly in the crosses provide more "control" than an all-gut string bed? Can the same effect be produced by just increasing the tension of an all-gut string bed? If so, is the poly-gut hybrid an exercise in cost control? 3. Does poly in the crosses somehow provide more spin than an all-gut string bed? If so, why does this happen? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, just wondering the reasoning behind the tactic before I plop down 20-30 dollars for a half set of gut to try it. Background on me: POG Mid with black genesis (52lbs) in the mains and whatever cheap synthetic I have lying around for my crosses (55lbs) Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,305
|
Gut in the crosses are a waste because you dont get most of the playability of gut. The poly crosses add more spin and crispen up the gut in the mains. If you use a good synthetic gut cross, since it doesnt have the quality of gut (being soft at high tensions, good tension maintenance) it goes off in a few hours (i tried) but since gut holds its tension really good and if your not a string breaker, they string the mains with gut at 58 or so and string a poly at 54 or so, and when the poly dies they just restring the crosses.
__________________
Yonex 100S @ 55/57 lbs Cyberflash/Attraction Just love Federer's one-handed backhand |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Baseline
Posts: 2,246
|
Gut in the crosses is a waste...the mains do most of the work.
Gut mains and poly crosses provide lots of spin, feel, and comfort without being overly powerful. A woman who tried my Pure Storm strung with VS/CoFocus declared it was waaay too low powered for her and yet it's strung at low tension compared to most.
__________________
L27" | 95" | 16x19 | Flex 57 | 336g | 8 HL | SW 320 VS Longevity / IsoSpeed Black Fire 17 @ 56 / 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 14,879
|
Just to echo the 2 posters above me, gut in the crosses is not worth the minimal improvement. Poly crosses help to tame the power of the gut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
|
With gut main and poly crosses u have:
_ Controlled power, since the poly crosses not only "tames" a little the power of gut, it also allows the gut to slide and snap back into place, giving u a lot of spin. Gut main and poly crosses have a low coefficient of friction, which is related with spin production http://twu.tennis-warehouse.com/lear...OFreporter.php _ Gut feel, since ur main string provides most of the feel. _ Nice value stringbed (Really?) because gut lasts a lot if ur not a string breaker, and u can restring the crosses if u are careful when the poly loses tension http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=399862 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
If you try it you'll know. My reccomendation: Klip Legend 17g crossed with Solinco Revolution or Outlast 17g. $35 total for two stringjobs. I also recomend 53/45 but YMMV on that. In any event do the poly at least 5lb lower than the gut. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,563
|
In addition to what has been stated, gut in the mains offers great tension maintenance allowing me to just cut out the poly crosses in 4 or 7 hours after polys become stiff or dead and retain playability.
|
|
|
|
| parasailing |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by parasailing |
|
|
#8 |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 77
|
Thanks to everyone for their replies. Looks like I need to give this a go to feel it for myself!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Professional
|
I wondered the same thing as the OP. Over the last few months I demoed several gut mains/poly crosses setups, then tried straight gut. The latter was simply too powerful, I kept hitting balls 2' past the baseline. And the gut seemed to wear faster than it would in a hybrid setup. And I was CONSTANTLY adjusting the strings.
To me, the main benefits are like what's been said above: - tame the power of gut - with some poly crosses I get more spin than a full gut job - less string movement - seem to get better durability of the gut mains. I assume that's because there's less friction on the mains as they slide on the crosses. I use Pacific Classic, which is $27 and plays very nicely. So a half set is less than $15. Basically I'm getting a full setup for less than $20 a pop and I get most of the feel of gut but with more control and spin and durability. A lot to like about that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 648
|
I have never used gut before and just did a global/bhbr hybrid. I find less spin and a little too much power. Feel is nice though
__________________
APD w/ BHBR 17 "I’m bi-winning. I win here and I win there." - Charlie Sheen |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 461
|
I agree with the posters above. Beside the points that they've already mentioned, there are quite a few reasons why you should use gut/poly:
first of all, there are some research that backs gut(main)/poly hybrid as the highest spin potential setup. And poly/gut has least spin compared to full poly and gut/poly because gut crosses creates high sliding friction especially when it saw. second, the gut/poly lasts longer than full poly and poly/gut in terms of playability. mains do most of the actions in groundies. gut maintains tension better than any other string. so gut/poly last the longest before it goes dead (you probably would break it before it's dead). third, Federer and Djokovic use it, so should you! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
|
Quote:
(guys, when you talk about strings it's kind of pointless unless you include tensions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 648
|
Strung it at 55/52. Normally use full bhbr at 50/52
__________________
APD w/ BHBR 17 "I’m bi-winning. I win here and I win there." - Charlie Sheen |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,616
|
Quote:
![]() This is my problem with polys crosses: I used to use a gut mains/poly crosses hybrid for a few months. The poly crosses will die within 4-6hours. The notion of cutting out perfectly good gut after 4-6hours sounded ridiculous to me, nor did I care for leaving/playing with dead polys in my frames. Playing with polys in the crosses is a moo-point to me. Like another poster said, crosses do next to nothing. Went back to the trusty Head RIP Control and have not messed my setup ever since. Gut mains/HEAD RIP Control crosses. Last edited by Say Chi Sin Lo : 01-23-2012 at 10:51 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Say Chi Sin Lo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 566
|
Quote:
__________________
Gamma RZR 98T(3x Retail + 1 Black Racquet) Bethany Swedes Tennis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,616
|
I think it depends on what you want to do with your frame. Whatever sensation you're trying to establish on impact, put that string in the cross. It'll get you that "crisper" or "softer" sensation.
|
|
|
|
| Say Chi Sin Lo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Say Chi Sin Lo |
|
|
#17 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 14,879
|
Quote:
I've used full poly for a grand total of 4 games and probably won't ever use it again so it is hard to compare. The main string is responsible for most of the feel of the string bed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
|
probably a good tension starting point relative to your usual. If you still have half a set of each to try one more time you might try the poly down around 45-47, imo the lower poly tension will tame the power of the mains better. (works for me).
Also I've heard Global is a bit sub-par. It may be that Gut isn't great in APD's I don't know if I've seen many Babolat users talk about gut. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 461
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 648
|
Quote:
__________________
APD w/ BHBR 17 "I’m bi-winning. I win here and I win there." - Charlie Sheen |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|