How serious are we ??

[Misterbill]

Originally Posted by TCF

But maybe thats the real plan. Either make it big only because dad gets the coaching credit and if not, you will be right here on my level. We either both make it or neither of us.

Yup. That's the only reason I can see for not trying a new coaching influence. Chance that a new coaching influence could spur a bump in the developmental trajectory. And the player would have nothing to lose but his chains

[Number1Coach]

Originally Posted by TCF

I read this and then came to the conclusion that spending even one additional second posting on this forum would be simply throwing away good time after bad.

I will enjoy lurking though every now and then to see how the grand plan plays out!

Like this will ever happen !!! TCF will go back sit in his closet while drinking a flat soda then come up with some new theory that his Buzz Lightyear and Woody doll tell him and will be back here like a Banshee on fire and present it like someone trying to point out what a good job dummy is doing in the White House!
Like I always say " will see"

[Misterbill]

Originally Posted by Number1Coach

Like this will ever happen !!! TCF will go back sit in his closet while drinking a flat soda then come up with some new theory that his Buzz Lightyear and Woody doll tell him and will be back here like a Banshee on fire and present it like someone trying to point out what a good job dummy is doing in the White House!
Like I always say " will see"

If his theories have equal validity as evolutionism, I would venture to say maybe 10%--20%, maybe more, of the readers here would think that is a compliment!

[Misterbill]

Originally Posted by Number1Coach

Like this will ever happen !!! TCF will go back sit in his closet while drinking a flat soda then come up with some new theory that his Buzz Lightyear and Woody doll tell him and will be back here like a Banshee on fire and present it like someone trying to point out what a good job dummy is doing in the White House!
Like I always say " will see"

The economic policies of Obama and the Democrats favor the rich and the policies of the Republicans favor the common man.

The universe was created in six days

Global warming is a hoax

I am Number 1 Coach

Gotta praise you for the consistency of your reasoning.

[Number1Coach]

Originally Posted by Misterbill

The economic policies of Obama and the Democrats favor the rich and the policies of the Republicans favor the common man.

The universe was created in six days

Global warming is a hoax

I am Number 1 Coach

Gotta praise you for the consistency of your reasoning.

Hey this is a fun one go look up , the Ice Age is coming in 1976 and the experts were really pushing that theory now they have changed their position Global warming ,sounds like one of their diciples on here !

On global warming I like it when its hot they say the earth is warming up when its cold they say see the earth is warming up , when I was young we called those 2 winter and summer !!

[TCF]

====================

[coaching32yrs]

Originally Posted by Misterbill

The economic policies of Obama and the Democrats favor the rich and the policies of the Republicans favor the common man.

The universe was created in six days

Global warming is a hoax

I am Number 1 Coach

Gotta praise you for the consistency of your reasoning.

Sorry MisterBill but Coach#1 is right on point 1. The Republican policies DO favor the common man in the long run. The Democrats have done nothing to curb the runaway freight train that is entitlement spending. We cannot tax the rich our way out of it. The numbers do not work. As entitlement spending, the federal debt, and interest rates all rise the common man will be in much worse shape.

[Misterbill]

Originally Posted by coaching32yrs

Sorry MisterBill but Coach#1 is right on point 1. The Republican policies DO favor the common man in the long run. The Democrats have done nothing to curb the runaway freight train that is entitlement spending. We cannot tax the rich our way out of it. The numbers do not work. As entitlement spending, the federal debt, and interest rates all rise the common man will be in much worse shape.

OK. On economic grounds....in the long run........the rich should support the Democrats and the poor should support the Republicans because "we cannot tax the rich our way out of it", as you say.

So if that Democratic policy is no good, I guess we gotta go with the other party and tax the middle class and cut entitlements for the poor. Just ran that by my lunch pail friends and told them it would be real good for them in the long run. They said in the long run they'd all be dead.

(I take it by your silence that you think point 4 is wrong)

[coaching32yrs]

Originally Posted by Misterbill

OK. On economic grounds....in the long run........the rich should support the Democrats and the poor should support the Republicans because "we cannot tax the rich our way out of it", as you say.

So if that Democratic policy is no good, I guess we gotta go with the other party and tax the middle class and cut entitlements for the poor. Just ran that by my lunch pail friends and told them it would be real good for them in the long run. They said in the long run they'd all be dead.

(I take it by your silence that you think point 4 is wrong)

Support positions that make sense, democratic or republican. A democratic pres. commissioned Bowles Simpson, which was bipartisan. It made sense. The same pres. mothballed the report because of politics. That's the problem. Ask your lunch pail friends how we going to pay the interest on the debt as it goes over 17 trillion. What happens when interest rates raise or China stops lending to us. Here's what real lunch pail folks say to that: don't understand the issue or don't care.

[Number1Coach]

Originally Posted by TCF

You are correct, its very hard for me to ignore you because you are such a great little package....a diehard, ultraright winger who repeats word for word what Rush and Fox tells him, combined with a tennis dad who tries to take all the credit for his kid's success.

I have had my fun with either one of them, but all in one package? Now that is pure gold!

lets pretend i am this rightwinger can you please explain how "Newsweek" cover 1975 edition says there is a coming ice age ,and now its a global warming , should i buy thick sleeping bags or tank tops ??

BTW did she win a match yet ????

[andfor]

Originally Posted by TCF

You are correct, its very hard for me to ignore you because you are such a great little package....a diehard, ultraright winger who repeats word for word what Rush and Fox tells him, combined with a tennis dad who tries to take all the credit for his kid's success.

I have had my fun with either one of them, but all in one package? Now that is pure gold!

Yeah, and you're a loony liberal who believes all the huge lies our President tells the American public. It's clear you obviously get your talking points from MSNBC, Al Gore, the Daily Kos and The Huffington Post.

You also are probably a big fan of Joe Biden. BAAAAH Ha ha ha!!!!!!

This thread will be gone soon or posts will be deleted.

[Misterbill]

Originally Posted by coaching32yrs

Support positions that make sense, democratic or republican. A democratic pres. commissioned Bowles Simpson, which was bipartisan. It made sense. The same pres. mothballed the report because of politics. That's the problem. Ask your lunch pail friends how we going to pay the interest on the debt as it goes over 17 trillion. What happens when interest rates raise or China stops lending to us. Here's what real lunch pail folks say to that: don't understand the issue or don't care.

Wrong. My lunch pail friends say they understand, and that the solution is more jobs....which will lead to higher tax revenues. They also said they think you are a little condescending toward working stiffs

[klu375]

They both need to take a break and join the discussion on high-school snacks. Maybe they can find a common ground there.

[coaching32yrs]

Originally Posted by Misterbill

Wrong. My lunch pail friends say they understand, and that the solution is more jobs....which will lead to higher tax revenues. They also said they think you are a little condescending toward working stiffs

We have to exit this discussion or the thread will be shut down. A little candy here and there is OK. Players eating candy on a regular basis is not good and will hurt their performace.

[NLBwell]

Though I'm chomping at the bit to get into a political discussion, I won't for the sake of not getting the thread deleted.
Just saw a study that showed eating chocolate cake with breakfast can increase weight loss since the people will stick with their restricted calorie diets longer. (same number of calories total with the chocolate cake)

[TCF]

====================

[Number1Coach]

Originally Posted by TCF

You are correct, its very hard for me to ignore you because you are such a great little package....a diehard, ultraright winger who repeats word for word what Rush and Fox tells him, combined with a tennis dad who tries to take all the credit for his kid's success.

I have had my fun with either one of them, but all in one package? Now that is pure gold!

TCF where you at ?

[Number1Coach]

What are veiwing to report TCF ? if so that truly is creepy or just man up and start posting we all know who you are