|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#141 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,298
|
Quote:
As for the decline of intelligence, we better hurry and come up with solutions to our problems for the benefit of our idiot descendants. We'll leave a detailed readme. Last edited by NadalDramaQueen : 02-15-2013 at 11:14 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| NadalDramaQueen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NadalDramaQueen |
|
|
#143 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,735
|
Exactly, **** sapiens is more intelligent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#144 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7,146
|
We are typically getting off the topic when that one poster tends to post his same old litany.
Mick3391 who started the thread realized that Laver was a tremendous player after finally viewing him. He saw what many of us saw over the years and came to the conclusion that Laver was great. So I do salute him in that he was open minded. There is no need to keep responding to the same tired argument that happens in every thread here it seems. It's really not a part of THIS thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Brighton, England.
Posts: 1,380
|
Quote:
__________________
ok, you wanna play games ?, you wanna play rough ?, ok, say hello to my leetle friend. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,298
|
Quote:
Also, there are many people who think Laver was great but not necessarily the greatest. There shouldn't be any hard feelings. |
|
|
|
|
| NadalDramaQueen |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by NadalDramaQueen |
|
|
#147 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13,627
|
Quote:
There were plenty of posts that went off topic. But since it was about the B. Brothers, you didn't mind the thread was hijack. Funny you would never "solute" the OP, but you would had the thread was related to any players during Laver's era, lol.
__________________
NadalAgassi: I think Serena's final slam tally will be something from 18-27. My best guess is 24 or 25 though; Nole(2010) will never win Wimbledon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#148 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,511
|
what tennis has earned at the ground level, it has lost at the top.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,511
|
I was looking at the 25 ' 1975 Dallas finals link, where we could see how great was Laver, even at 36, losing an extremely close match to peak Borg.
but he was not perfect.The only real big title he never won was precisely the WCT Finals.He lost the 1971 and 1972 finals to Ken Rosewall, and lost the 1973 semis to Smith and that 1975 semifinal match against Borg. Charlton Heston, the narrator mentions that this may have been the second best match at Dallas, after the 1972 final.I think the 1983 final that pitted Mc Enroe and Lendl is just as close.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#150 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 664
|
I haven't watched a lot of tennis in the last 5-10 years.
Watched the 2013 AO. Was bored silly. WTF has tennis come to? Long boring rallies, few kill shots, zero excitement. Courier, Sampras, Goran, Safin etc. They were exciting players. This modern lot of players is hampered by the sludgy courts and the need to hit loopy topspin every freakin' shot. Speed up the damn courts already. And Laver? One of the top 5 in any era. IMO.
__________________
3 Pro Staff 85 St V & 2 PS85 MICs, Yamaha Secret 04 (dubs stick), Steam 99S Lux Monotec 16L 45 lbs, KPS 88 w/ TB 19 35 lbs |
|
|
|
|
|
#151 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,511
|
Quote:
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|