|
|
#41 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 18,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,223
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Before TW: satisfied POG Mid user for over 20 years After TW: racketholic - never settled - always looking for my next fix |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,723
|
Mecir showed to public eye, I think around 1985.He beat Connors at Philadelphia, where heīd lose the final to mighty Mac.He also reached the IO final ( lost to Noah) after beating all the swede squad, one after the other.
I think he defeated, at least once, all the big players of the 80īs, from Jimmy Connors to Ivan Lendl, John mc Enroe,Boris Becker,Stefan Edberg and Mats Wilander. He also looked like it was the easiest thing in the world.
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,746
|
Boris Becker had his own theory. He said, that Mecir put him to sleep, especially with his sissy serve. I thought that Mecir looked always half asleep, walking and acting very slowly in between points. But, when the point was on, he could glide into his shots and hit very cleanly and deceptively, especially on his backhand. He was the one, who could outplay McEnroe, not only overpower him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,106
|
tomic reminds me of a modern day mecir with more power. has very laid back strokes imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,723
|
Mecir with a better serve and bigger will to win is an all timer
But then, it is not Mecir
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,066
|
^^ I guess it would be odd if Mecir had a monster serve paired with those sleepy groundies. So yeah, you're right. It wouldn't be Mecir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,727
|
It's pretty much between Mecir, Rios and Okker as the greatest open era non-slam winner. I like Mecir.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 10,723
|
Quote:
Pecci, Leconte, Gottfried were FO finalists but Pecci made it close much more so than Rios and Mecir
__________________
" I have watched plenty of matches of the 70īs and 80īs" ABMK, the historian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 10,020
|
Great list!
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
New User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 78
|
he had elements in his game that everybody glowingly talks about in federer's repertoire. he was called 'the cat' for good reason. he was nimble and quick but oddly always seemed like he was playing in slow motion. effortless strokes as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 199
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|