|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 542
|
Came across this another thread and thought it deserved a thread on it's own - I have nothing to do with it's all from doug9238
Here is the original thread: http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=385000 Reading some of the posts - I realized I should post the link to the original thread - as some people are thinking this is a way for rec players to move up their level. Hope this clears up the confusion. Quote:
Last edited by jrs : 04-16-2013 at 10:49 AM. Reason: Put it into context of the original post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,144
|
Sounds great in theory. I don't agree that most people are capable of achieving it. You take your average joe off the street and actually submit him to this program, he will probably only get to the 4.5 part if lucky. Each step is glossed over as if it a matter of fact that will happen if you just do it. So far of all people posting here who claim to be pursuing ATP points from a recreational level adult start. Nobody has even come close.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NorCal Bay Area
Posts: 3,198
|
Quote:
Those are huge ifs though. How many people would be willing to spend 30+ hours and $400+ a week on tennis and training, just to get to 4.5? EDIT: I don't mean to say that this is the only way to get to 4.5 of course... in reality most 4.5s get that way because they also have some innate talent and without putting in nearly that level of effort. What I mean is that if you take a random 35 or younger person off the street and subject him to that level of training, I would have a 90%+ confidence level that he would be able to reach 4.5. Last edited by OrangePower : 04-16-2013 at 09:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| OrangePower |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by OrangePower |
|
|
#4 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 542
|
I don't think I even know anyone that would dedicate themselves to the level Doug describes. But it is the best description, I've come across that explains the Pro Tennis game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 519
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NorCal Bay Area
Posts: 3,198
|
Quote:
Of course I didn't mean to imply that it's not possible for anyone over 35 to work their way to 4.5. Just that with someone < 35, I think it's 90%+ possible given total dedication. Whereas > 35, maybe only 50% possible even with the same level of dedication, because of potential physical limitations. PS I'm not in the <35 category either |
|
|
|
|
| OrangePower |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by OrangePower |
|
|
#7 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 109
|
Step 1.) be born with natural talent, excellent hand eye coordination, and athletic ability/potential
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: At Large
Posts: 2,178
|
I saw doug9238's post in the other thread and thought it was intended to be tongue-in-cheek and not a serious post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,144
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 542
|
I thought this makes sense. I wanted to see what others thought of it. I would think you need to put this type of work in to get to the top level in tennis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 796
|
That advice was for a 4.5/open player. If that level of player was willing to put in all the time, effort and $$ that the post suggests, I would think they'd be pretty disappointed if they didn't get their point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 2,513
|
An interesting post, it's the sort of thing that a 40 year old would come up with if he spent all day in a pub with just a pen, notepad and a lifetime of regrets as company.
#2 would make more sense if: 1) Long run was cut shorter. 2) Tempo // hill sprint one week, vo2 max // hill sprint the following week rather than tempo // vo2 max each week. 3) VO2 max work was a total of about 6 weeks (improvements plateau over less than 3 months). 4) It included explosive footwork sessions on the court. 5) 2 rest days would be beneficial. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Quote:
Has to be a joke. -3 months to develop a pro level cardio base? -3 months of work in the gym to build the muscle you need to compete? -1600 serves per week (4x per week 100 1st serves to both sides with 60% in and 100 2nd serves to both sides with 98%) LOL! A pro level game is built over decades of practice and work. Your average rec player would fall apart physically before they even got half way through this, especially if that person was your average 30-something 3.5/4.0 USTA player.
__________________
Ludacris: My chick bad! Tell me if you seen her. She always brings the racket like Venus and Serena! |
|
|
|
|
| JRstriker12 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by JRstriker12 |
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NorCal Bay Area
Posts: 3,198
|
Got you, yeah, I agree... ceiling for most adults who didn't have extensive training as juniors is 5.0ish, even with dedication.
|
|
|
|
| OrangePower |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by OrangePower |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 542
|
Quote:
He makes the point about what you do in practice - exactly what you do in the match. That's what I meant about explaining the pro game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,948
|
Quote:
No seriously.. I need specifics. Run this.. for this long.. this many times a week. Thanks Moz!
__________________
"[Luke:] I can't believe it. [Yoda:] That is why you fail." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14,191
|
Quote:
I'm a 4.0. A lot of the 4.5 women I know are older than 40, and they got to 4.5 without working at it obsessively. No training, some instruction, lots of match play. Heck, I think I could make it to 4.5 in three years if I really tried and really paid a lot for instruction. I would imagine someone 35 and under ought to be able to get to 5.0. Is that wrong?
__________________
-- Random Error Generator, Version 4.0 -- Master Moonballer |
|
|
|
|
| Cindysphinx |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Cindysphinx |
|
|
#18 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 373
|
i think if someone were to follow these instructions they would get above 4.5 within a year or two. it also depends if your talking about doubles or singles, or high level 4.5 or average 4.5. i dont personally see 4.5 as that high of a level. however, progressing past that is tough. not only because 5.0 and 5.5 are way better divisions, but also because they dont technically exist. anything above a 4.5 is now playing open tournaments, and opens have a very large range of players. i wouldnt know where to define that range either, and i have played quite a few opens.
__________________
pstgt, BHBR-17@56/54lb's |
|
|
|
| yonexpurestorm |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by yonexpurestorm |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,144
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NorCal Bay Area
Posts: 3,198
|
Quote:
Quote:
I do think that many people < 35 can get to 5.0 if completely dedicated. But not 90%+. Whereas I believe 90%+ can get to 4.5. |
||
|
|
|
| OrangePower |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by OrangePower |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|