• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Peak Play GOATS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 3 of 8 < 12 3 45 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2013, 03:36 PM   #41
forzamilan90
Hall Of Fame
 
forzamilan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Black Lodge
Posts: 3,984
Cool

Ok this is going to be a massive post so just beware.

In terms of greatness of winners (points) and variety I think the following makes a solid case:

God Mode exhibit A: Freaky Lobs Concoctions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hp-EArV6s8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc1RCqidtTg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yidqJM1Xl4U

God Mode exhibit B: Tweeners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37qyvTRVus8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QobvppHSjB4

God mode exhibit C: Serve
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QZQe-B4cNI

God mode exhibit D: Forehand Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_CuXqNBr2c

God mode exhibit E: Backhand Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bByvWPmMZ_8

God mode exhibit F: Slice Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B01nhqJizTc

God mode exhibit G: Return Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxzFlrFfUrg

God mode exhibit H: Volley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INE4Y5CzoBM

God mode exhibit I: Dropshot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAeFXIIq95A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq33L8K2mVs

God mode exhibit J: Smash (Both Backhand and Forehand)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2vF9xnL-EU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCownMHsCTI


Actual matches where Fed enters God Mode and it's scary

Federer vs Roddick - Australian Open 2007 Semi Final 6-4, 6-0, 6-2

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6Bdn-Ml8rU

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ikx0Du735Y

Federer vs Hewitt - U.S. Open 2004 Final 6-0, 7-6 (3), 6-0

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge17unv-XrI

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfb2PDlIc3o

Federer vs Nadal - World Tour Finals 2007 Semi Final 6-4, 6-1

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed7iRmkUhek

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR7do5BFgzA

Federer vs Nadal - World Tour Finals 2011 Round Robin 6-3, 6-0

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjwaygk40LM

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6az62bmV5hM

Federer vs Gaudio - World Tour Finals 2005 Round Robin 6-0, 6-0

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwreJJgeYIg

Federer vs Del Potro - Australian Open 2009 Quarter Finals 6-3, 6-0, 6-0

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcfqC_DqQyE

Federer vs Blake - World Tour Finals 2006 Final 6-0, 6-3, 6-4

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imLOdUK0Kfs

Federer vs Agassi - World Tour Finals 2003 Final 6-3, 6-0, 6-4

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_dgHOVPy9g

there's some more, but looking at the screen is beginning to hurt.
__________________
The Black Lodge Military Visionary at your service...

Last edited by forzamilan90 : 03-15-2013 at 03:44 PM.
forzamilan90 is offline   Reply With Quote
forzamilan90
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by forzamilan90
Old 03-15-2013, 03:43 PM   #42
forzamilan90
Hall Of Fame
 
forzamilan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Black Lodge
Posts: 3,984
Default

man that took a while, and it sucks I was going to embed the videos and all but it came looking all messed up. Oh well I'll keep the formatting as such.
__________________
The Black Lodge Military Visionary at your service...
forzamilan90 is offline   Reply With Quote
forzamilan90
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by forzamilan90
Old 03-15-2013, 03:46 PM   #43
forzamilan90
Hall Of Fame
 
forzamilan90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Black Lodge
Posts: 3,984
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
90's Clay, Thanks for a not All-Federer list.

Even though I'm an Austrian I would think that Nadal is stronger than peak Muster...
He is much younger than you guys, but suffers from a bad case of "Sampras got surpassed so I'll hate on everything after his reign and complain and take shots at every modern player every chance I get" syndrome
__________________
The Black Lodge Military Visionary at your service...
forzamilan90 is offline   Reply With Quote
forzamilan90
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by forzamilan90
Old 03-15-2013, 03:52 PM   #44
ARFED
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Lobb View Post
Hoad had a great record on clay, including against Rosewall and Trabert. All three could have handled Borg or Nadal on clay.
If you want to, you can see Rosewall on clay.
I have seen Rosewall play against Laver (long highlights) in Rg 1968 and i respectfully disagree with you. Only Borg and Djokovic could handle (and even them to some extent) Nadal`s crazy top spin on clay. A peak form Nadal on clay is the closest one can get to an invincible player (this coming from a huge Fed fan). Again i must say, this is provided modern equipment for all players. If i take out poly from Nadal the story changes a a lot. But it is all suppositions i guess
ARFED is offline   Reply With Quote
ARFED
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ARFED
Old 03-15-2013, 03:54 PM   #45
borg number one
Legend
 
borg number one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,045
Default

Nice links forzamilan, now imagine if they had high def and You Tube around for Laver and all the greats after that? Or even Gonzalez forward? Modern tennis watchers, including myself, should often be reminded that tennis is much, much bigger than what's only on Tennis Channel these days.
__________________
Borg never pointed to himself. He never even seemed to care if anyone read the advertisements. — Tom Callahan

Last edited by borg number one : 03-15-2013 at 04:53 PM.
borg number one is offline   Reply With Quote
borg number one
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by borg number one
Old 03-15-2013, 04:52 PM   #46
W.P. Mayhew
Rookie
 
W.P. Mayhew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 298
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by borg number one View Post
Nice links forzamilan, now imagine if they had high def and You Tube around for Laver and all the greats after that? Or even Gonzalez forward? Modern tennis watchers, including myself, should often be reminded that tennis is much, much bigger than what's only on tennis Channel these days.
Tennis needs a Martin Scorsese-like guy working hard to restore and preserve old tennis matches. Older stuff shot on film could be tracked and restored to a very decent quality. Sorry for the off topic... Nice compilation, forza.
__________________
"And to the bone, I'm evergreen."
W.P. Mayhew is offline   Reply With Quote
W.P. Mayhew
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by W.P. Mayhew
Old 03-15-2013, 05:22 PM   #47
Zimbo
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benhur View Post
Ok. I can only talk of what I have seen that stuck in my mind as a great level of play. In the grand scheme of tennis things, what I have seen is squat, but I'll tell you anyway what impressed me the most.
In chronological order. Level refers to the winner, though in some cases the loser was not far behind. Some matches are blowouts, but the loser is not to blame.
----------------------------

I remember some footage of a Laver-Roche AO semifinal in 1969. Impressive play by Laver.

Borg at his first Wimbledon final against McEnroe in 1980.

Connors at Wimbledon 1982 against McEnroe.

McEnroe against Connors in 1984 at Wimbledon.

McEnroe at the USO against Connors that year.

Cash against Lendl at Wimbledon 1987.

Lendl at the Master’s final against Wilander in 1987.

Nadal against Coria in Rome 2005

Federer against Gaudio at the WTF 2005 (double bagle)

Federer against Bjorkman Wimbledon 2006

Federer against Roddick AO in 2007

Federer against Nadal Wimbledon 2007

Nadal against Djokovic at FO 2008

Nadal against Federer Wimbledon 2008

Federer against Andreev at the USO 2008

Nadal against Verdasco AO 2009

Nadal against Djokovic Madrid 2009

Nadal against Djokovic USO 2010

Djokovic against Nadal Miami 2011 (this is the best I've seen Djokovic play, and maybe Nadal as well even though he lost)
Great list

I would add

Becker vs Edberg and Wilander Davis Cup finals '89 (I think only god mode Fed/Sampras/or Mac could even compete against Becker that weekend on that fast indoor court)
Edberg vs Jim C USO final '91
Edberg vs Wilander AO semi '90
Sampras vs Becker Masters final '94 and '96
Sampras vs Becker Wimbledon final '95
Becker vs Sampras Stuttgart finals '96
Wilander vs Leconte FO final '88
Wilander vs Lendl USO final '88
Lendl vs many during his terminator/Darth Vader mode reign '85-'87
Sampras vs Agassi many times
Zimbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Zimbo
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Zimbo
Old 03-15-2013, 05:25 PM   #48
borg number one
Legend
 
borg number one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,045
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by W.P. Mayhew View Post
Tennis needs a Martin Scorsese-like guy working hard to restore and preserve old tennis matches. Older stuff shot on film could be tracked and restored to a very decent quality. Sorry for the off topic... Nice compilation, forza.
Absolutely. That would be great W.P. Mayhew. It would help bring the greats from the past much more "into focus" wouldn't it?
__________________
Borg never pointed to himself. He never even seemed to care if anyone read the advertisements. — Tom Callahan
borg number one is offline   Reply With Quote
borg number one
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by borg number one
Old 03-15-2013, 07:33 PM   #49
abmk
G.O.A.T.
 
abmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 11,491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benhur View Post
Ok. I can only talk of what I have seen that stuck in my mind as a great level of play. In the grand scheme of tennis things, what I have seen is squat, but I'll tell you anyway what impressed me the most.
In chronological order. Level refers to the winner, though in some cases the loser was not far behind. Some matches are blowouts, but the loser is not to blame.
----------------------------

I remember some footage of a Laver-Roche AO semifinal in 1969. Impressive play by Laver.

Borg at his first Wimbledon final against McEnroe in 1980.

Connors at Wimbledon 1982 against McEnroe.

McEnroe against Connors in 1984 at Wimbledon.

McEnroe at the USO against Connors that year.

Cash against Lendl at Wimbledon 1987.

Lendl at the Master’s final against Wilander in 1987.

Nadal against Coria in Rome 2005

Federer against Gaudio at the WTF 2005 (double bagle)

Federer against Bjorkman Wimbledon 2006

Federer against Roddick AO in 2007

Federer against Nadal Wimbledon 2007

Nadal against Djokovic at FO 2008

Nadal against Federer Wimbledon 2008

Federer against Andreev at the USO 2008

Nadal against Verdasco AO 2009

Nadal against Djokovic Madrid 2009

Nadal against Djokovic USO 2010

Djokovic against Nadal Miami 2011 (this is the best I've seen Djokovic play, and maybe Nadal as well even though he lost)
eh, you have federer vs gaudio, which was a very good, solid match from federer, but not his very best, but not the USO 2004 final vs hewitt ?

also for nadal, RG 2008 SF vs djokovic, but not RG 2008 F vs federer ?
__________________
Becker,Edberg and Sampras would baggel him ( federer ) on fast indoor or grass more often than not. - the one and only kiki

Last edited by abmk : 03-15-2013 at 09:48 PM.
abmk is offline   Reply With Quote
abmk
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by abmk
Old 03-16-2013, 03:55 AM   #50
NatF
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyOne View Post
NatF, Yes, I rank Federer fifth regarding achievements and about tenth regarding playing level (which is not identic with peak play. Otherwise I must rank Hoad at first place, not at No.3 which I actually do, behind Rosewall and equal Laver).
How do you seperate playing level from peak play? Is playing level what you consider their consistant level to be?

Quote:
I don't remember which peak Federer matches I have seen but I did see matches at Paris, Wimbledon and Melbourne.
Might as I suggest to someone who professes to be a historian, that you should watch more of the Federer matches mentioned in this thread. I would watch more Rosewall if there were videos.

Quote:
The Rosewall matches which I have seen were disappointing for me: Wimbledon 1970, final; W.1974,SF, W.1974 final. In those matches Rosewall was not in best shape. I also saw a few early round matches of the 1975 W. won by Muscles against lesser players: Andersson (Sweden) and Barazzutti...
Then how is it that you can so strongly claim that Federer is beneath Rosewall in terms of level of play? I'd venture that I've seen alot more of Federer than you've seen of Rosewall and perhaps Federer combined...

Quote:
Generally the current players look faster than those of older times but I'm convinced it's mostly because of the improvement of equipment. Useing wood I would favour Rosewall over Federer.
Being taller also helps with longer strides when running. If Federer grew up with wood raquets I think you'd be surprised. His speed and footwork are excellent which would help with his timing with the smaller raquets. He'd also excell in fast conditions...

Quote:
I'm sure that the 1963 Rosewall was stronger than the 1970 one.
No doubt, but if you didn't see it how much better is just an assumption.
NatF is online now   Reply With Quote
NatF
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NatF
Old 03-16-2013, 03:59 AM   #51
Benhur
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abmk View Post
eh, you have federer vs gaudio, which was a very good, solid match from federer, but not his very best, but not the USO 2004 final vs hewitt ?

also for nadal, RG 2008 SF vs djokovic, but not RG 2008 F vs federer ?
That's because I didn't watch the Hewitt match, or don't remember it. I just put down things I've seen that stuck in my mind to this day as pretty astonishing performances. I am sure there are plenty of matches I've missed, especially from the 90s.

As for Nadal's 2008 RG, it's hard to pick a match from there (and I didn't want to pick more than one) because he was so dominant throughout the tournament. His level against Federer was also very high, of course, but at the same time, once Federer fell behind in the 3rd, it looked as if he just went through the motions a little bit. Djokovc is the only one who managed to put up some resistance. He won more games than Verdasco, Almagro and Federer combined.

Last edited by Benhur : 03-16-2013 at 04:02 AM.
Benhur is offline   Reply With Quote
Benhur
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Benhur
Old 03-16-2013, 04:54 AM   #52
The-Champ
Legend
 
The-Champ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benhur View Post
That's because I didn't watch the Hewitt match, or don't remember it. I just put down things I've seen that stuck in my mind to this day as pretty astonishing performances. I am sure there are plenty of matches I've missed, especially from the 90s.

As for Nadal's 2008 RG, it's hard to pick a match from there (and I didn't want to pick more than one) because he was so dominant throughout the tournament. His level against Federer was also very high, of course, but at the same time, once Federer fell behind in the 3rd, it looked as if he just went through the motions a little bit. Djokovc is the only one who managed to put up some resistance. He won more games than Verdasco, Almagro and Federer combined.
Didn't Nadal have two breaks in that third set before he took his foot off the gas and Djokovic started to go for broke? Nadal was a freak in that tournament both physically and game-wise..
__________________
GOAT!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4PtT9Ly-yA
The-Champ is offline   Reply With Quote
The-Champ
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by The-Champ
Old 03-16-2013, 05:52 AM   #53
hoodjem
Legend
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NatF View Post
He was a winner machine when he was on. This shot was ridiculous...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...0Du735Y#t=167s
Amazing winners!

This is exactly what I meant by peak play. Good choice. Fed can do no wrong!
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little.

Last edited by hoodjem : 03-16-2013 at 06:00 AM.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote
hoodjem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hoodjem
Old 03-16-2013, 05:59 AM   #54
hoodjem
Legend
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forzamilan90 View Post
Ok this is going to be a massive post so just beware.

In terms of greatness of winners (points) and variety I think the following makes a solid case:

God Mode exhibit A: Freaky Lobs Concoctions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Hp-EArV6s8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc1RCqidtTg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yidqJM1Xl4U

God Mode exhibit B: Tweeners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37qyvTRVus8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QobvppHSjB4

God mode exhibit C: Serve
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QZQe-B4cNI

God mode exhibit D: Forehand Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_CuXqNBr2c

God mode exhibit E: Backhand Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bByvWPmMZ_8

God mode exhibit F: Slice Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B01nhqJizTc

God mode exhibit G: Return Demonstration
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxzFlrFfUrg

God mode exhibit H: Volley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INE4Y5CzoBM

God mode exhibit I: Dropshot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAeFXIIq95A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq33L8K2mVs

God mode exhibit J: Smash (Both Backhand and Forehand)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2vF9xnL-EU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCownMHsCTI


Actual matches where Fed enters God Mode and it's scary

Federer vs Roddick - Australian Open 2007 Semi Final 6-4, 6-0, 6-2

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6Bdn-Ml8rU

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ikx0Du735Y

Federer vs Hewitt - U.S. Open 2004 Final 6-0, 7-6 (3), 6-0

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge17unv-XrI

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfb2PDlIc3o

Federer vs Nadal - World Tour Finals 2007 Semi Final 6-4, 6-1

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed7iRmkUhek

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR7do5BFgzA

Federer vs Nadal - World Tour Finals 2011 Round Robin 6-3, 6-0

Full Match
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjwaygk40LM

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6az62bmV5hM

Federer vs Gaudio - World Tour Finals 2005 Round Robin 6-0, 6-0

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwreJJgeYIg

Federer vs Del Potro - Australian Open 2009 Quarter Finals 6-3, 6-0, 6-0

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcfqC_DqQyE

Federer vs Blake - World Tour Finals 2006 Final 6-0, 6-3, 6-4

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imLOdUK0Kfs

Federer vs Agassi - World Tour Finals 2003 Final 6-3, 6-0, 6-4

Highlights
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_dgHOVPy9g

there's some more, but looking at the screen is beginning to hurt.
Great list. (Thank goodness for video and the Internet.)
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote
hoodjem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hoodjem
Old 03-16-2013, 06:25 AM   #55
borg number one
Legend
 
borg number one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,045
Default

It's nice that we have video and the internet available in the way we do to see examples of peak play for Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic for example, but we can't use it in the same way to see and assess peak play for players like Gonzalez, Rosewall, Laver, Borg, McEnroe, and even Sampras to a large extent. Even with Sampras, YouTube, video, and the internet was not used in the way it is these days. Well, at least we can see today's tennis in High Def, with great audio and video quality. Therefore, we have to greatly rely upon what each of us has been able to observe and also read about from the accounts of others as to players from past eras.
__________________
Borg never pointed to himself. He never even seemed to care if anyone read the advertisements. — Tom Callahan
borg number one is offline   Reply With Quote
borg number one
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by borg number one
Old 03-16-2013, 06:28 AM   #56
NatF
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by borg number one View Post
It's nice that we have video and the internet available in the way we do to see examples of peak play for Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic for example, but we can't use it in the same way to see and assess peak play for players like Gonzalez, Rosewall, Laver, Borg, McEnroe, and even Sampras to a large extent. Even with Sampras, YouTube, video, and the internet was not used in the way it is these days. Well, at least we can see today's tennis in High Def, with great audio and video quality. Therefore, we have to greatly rely upon what each of us has been able to observe and also read about from the accounts of others as to players from past eras.
There are still lots of video highlights and even full matches for Sampras, even for players such as Borg there are quite a few clips and even some full matches on the internet.

Relying on memory is pretty tricky, you're more likely to remember the winners than the unforced errors. It is a shame HD wasn't around from the 60's though.

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...long&lclk=long

Quite a few big matches there. Any of those good showcases to Borg's peak level?

Turns out the 1969 US Open final with Laver and Roche is online. Would that match give an idea of the ability of Laver?

Last edited by NatF : 03-16-2013 at 06:36 AM.
NatF is online now   Reply With Quote
NatF
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NatF
Old 03-16-2013, 06:41 AM   #57
boredone3456
Hall Of Fame
 
boredone3456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,254
Default

If the sole criteria for being included in this discussion is just peak level of play then this has to expand the discussion beyond just the normal GOAT contenders (who seem to be taking up the majority of the discussion). If overall achievements do not matter than I would say include the following players, especially if as hoodjem says, the criteria is peak play in one match.

Safin: he was an erratic mess of potential and his game had technical flaws that were exploitable (forehand that could be broken down, inconsistent at net)..but when he clicked he CLICKED. The 2005 AO is an example of that. His weaknesses in that tournament never really showed up against Fed, Fed played great..Satin was better on the day. Overall he was all over the place though.

Mary Pierce: yes I know this discussion is about men but I can't just not mention her. The 94 french SF against Graf fits so perfectly into what I interpret this discussion to be about. Pierce flat out destroyed the Graf forehand, neutralized her movement as much as could possibly be done, stopped her dead. Graf had nothing to beat her with. If Pierce could have played like that everyday she would have won double digit majors easily.

Ivanisevic: OK maybe he does not fit perfectly in but on grass with his serve he was a force to he reckoned with on his best day. It was either serve your best and pray for a miracle in the likely tie break or get beaten.

These are 3 examples that came to my mind when I read the thread title. Now..I am not saying their peak is better than Lavers, Borges,Macs etc. But if the thread is really about peak play for just 1 match...you can't really just center the discussion around just them. I have immense respect for all of them, but in terms of pure peak level for a single match..if cumulative stats are not to be considered..you have to look outside the box a little.

Just my opinion though.
boredone3456 is offline   Reply With Quote
boredone3456
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by boredone3456
Old 03-16-2013, 06:42 AM   #58
borg number one
Legend
 
borg number one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,045
Default

Boredone, I think that's a valid point. There are other players that are less accomplished overall, but still exhibited great peak level of play.

Also, I completely agree NatF. There is quite a bit, but with the HD video and crystal clear audio, modern tennis can be seen in a way that it could not before. Plus, the editing capabilities these days make those great Video highlights amazing. I know this is not shotmaking based, but this is some good stuff as far as Borg, Sampras, and Federer. Watch Borg and Lendl here, with old technology indoors and on clay, as well as video of Borg vs. McEnroe, Connors, and Vilas, on varied surfaces.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYa1bSRoOzs (Kings of Wimbledon)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyuiEzBb7hk (thanks Borgforever)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL__OcegrbY (thanks Krosero)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKQVdZNsyuQ (thanks Krosero)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTMx--E0OhY


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ND6BqlTwZbU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-BwXwUzMLo


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhbI...=results_video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCAS3FjJvFI
__________________
Borg never pointed to himself. He never even seemed to care if anyone read the advertisements. — Tom Callahan

Last edited by borg number one : 03-16-2013 at 07:00 AM.
borg number one is offline   Reply With Quote
borg number one
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by borg number one
Old 03-16-2013, 06:47 AM   #59
hoodjem
Legend
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 9,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NatF View Post
Being taller also helps with longer strides when running. If Federer grew up with wood raquets I think you'd be surprised. His speed and footwork are excellent which would help with his timing with the smaller raquets. He'd also excell in fast conditions...
But apparently one can be too tall, also, and thus not a great mover.

For instance, Rosewall and Laver were both much quicker, faster, and better movers than Isner or Karlovic. Maybe they have longer strides, but these latter two are rather lumbering and slow by comparison.
__________________
The smart man thinks he knows a lot; the wise man is aware that he knows little.

Last edited by hoodjem : 03-16-2013 at 06:52 AM.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote
hoodjem
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hoodjem
Old 03-16-2013, 06:51 AM   #60
NatF
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,682
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoodjem View Post
But apparently one can be too tall, also, and thus not a great mover.

For instance, Rosewall and Laver were both much quicker, faster, and better movers than Isner.
No doubt. I've seen clips enough of Rosewall and Laver to know that they're quick, Ferrer is another who is very quick despite his height. But Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Murray are all 6'1 to 6'3 or so and are great movers which good footwork. Against these guys I think Laver and Rosewall would find it very difficult to keep up with. But you're right there is a trade off.
NatF is online now   Reply With Quote
NatF
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NatF
Reply
Page 3 of 8 < 12 3 45 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Peak Play GOATS

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse