|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,609
|
Just finished playing in an open doubles tournament. Players ranged in skill from USTA 3.5 to 4.5. After the dust settled the finals were played by a two teams consisting of 4.5 players. Interestingly, 3 of the 4 were using "granny" sticks. One Hammer H4, one monster Head (looked like a snowshoe), and a Prince Thunderlite OS. Sole "player's" frame was a Radical Ti Midplus. I had the pleasure of playing against both teams and believe me they could hit any shot and serve with ease. The topspin these guys generated was insane.
I keep seeing more and more sub 11 oz. frames. The recreational game is truly evolving toward lighter equipment. -k- |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,844
|
Yeah...for doubles I would definitely agree...I also see lots of light sticks like the Thunderlight OS. However, I do still see a higher percentage of heavier frames in the singles side, though that seems to be trending lighter as well.
The whole weight debate gets pretty silly sometimes...one one extreme, some people seem to have a macho attitude around how heavy their frame is, and then you'll have others (a zealot friend of mine is a good example) who claims that anyone who plays w/a stick that weighs more than 10.5 oz is a fool. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 159
|
Its not that uncommon for people to use a lighter racquet for doubles, i use a 13oz for singles and a 10.5 for doubles (which i rarely play).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,129
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,171
|
I say whatever works for ya _ but it is FOOLISH to copy what the world class players use, because they hit a much heavier ball + they're much stronger ( wrists forearms etc..) than the average Joe..
|
|
|
|
| bluegrasser |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by bluegrasser |
|
|
#6 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,129
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,844
|
Quote:
I exaggerated his position a bit to make a point, that there isn't a one-size fits all answer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,446
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,566
|
You've just got to go with the racquet that accentuates your strengths and doesn't add on to your weaknesses.
I play only doubles now but use a midsize racquet (1987 Prestige Pro) strung quite loosely and weighing in at a bit over 12.6 ounces. That isn't the norm by a long way, however, I rely on hitting a very heavy, flat shot plus approach shots with a lot of penetration and need the extra weight so that when I lean into the ball I'll have something very solid and very stable behind my shot. If my technique and strengths were different then Im sure my choice of racquet and weight would be vastly different as well. My occassional doubles partner uses a stock Dunlop 300G which comes in at under 11 ounces. He's formerly the top ranked player in the state and has played on the satellite circuit so you'd figure he knows what he's doing. He prefers a lighter racquet and does a pretty good job of using it. Dont see myself still swinging a 12.6 ounce midsize frame in my 40's though. If you want to still be competitive as you get older you do have to get smarter with your equipment and accept all of the help on offer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|