|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,437
|
and it feels great! just letting you know, if you are having problems with a full western grip, try semi. i had big problems like when i hit the ball, the would fall straight to the ground and not even go over the net with full western. now with a semi, i can brush the ball up more and go through the ball easier allowing for more penatrating topspin drives. as some of you know, i wanted to model my forehand after ferrero, but that has changed. in fact, i think my forehand looks alot more like federer's! lol.
well, this is just a heads up for those having problems with a full western grip. take semi-western out for a spin (no pun intended) and see how it plays. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 879
|
Watch Ferrero, he doesn't always use a western grip, especially at wimbledon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
TwistServe
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
| TwistServe |
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,437
|
yea, low balls were murder to me before. i did correct my swingpath eventually though. the ball only went down when i started using a full western.
it just took alot more energy for me to swing like that though. i had to bend my knees alot more to get beneath the ball. and i wouldnt get enough pace or depth on the ball either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 12,900
|
The full western is great for high balls, but if you plan on taking a trajectory other than than down, semi-western is the way to go for topspin. Keep in mind that you can topspin with the racquet facing down(western), angled(semi-western), open faced(eastern forehand), even with the racquet turned up(lob grip), so stop looking for a full western to generate more topspin, it's a low to high motion except on high balls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,437
|
actually, the reason why i wanted to use a full western was to add that extra high kick after the ball hits the ground.
but yea, i get your point. i wasnt swinging correctly at the ball. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 12,900
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 353
|
I've gone the other way.
I learned the forehand with eastern.....then I progressed to the semi-western...and now I am using a western grip. I have found that the Western grip is without question the best grip for my topspin forehand on the hardcourts. Because of my short stature (5'6 for a guy) the eastern grip just was not practical for me. The strike zone for an eastern forehand ,at waist level, was just to low on today's hardcourts. The eastern gave me no leverage for any ball above my waist. The only disadvantage i've read regarding this grip is that low balls are problematic for the Western. Personally, I have not found this to be the case. I think there are two reasons for this. Number one, I am short for a guy (at 5'6). Number two, I have no problem bending at the knees and I am flexible at the hips. So I would recommend this grip for any guy who is kind of short and flexible. On the other hand I can see how this grip could be problematic for really tall guys and/or for guys who are not that flexible at the knees and hips. Also, and i know this is a minority point of view, I've found that I like hitting lower bouncing balls with the Western. The extra spin potential that this grip affords, makes it easier for me to "work" the ball up and over the net. |
|
|
|
| troytennisbum |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by troytennisbum |
|
|
#9 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 12,900
|
A low sliced ball is extremely difficult to get over the net with a full western grip. I use a continental to scoop up very low balls and found that it works great for hitting angles too. Full western is great for high balls, but I'm definitely not convinced that it's a good grip to handle low balls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,437
|
one of my classmates likes to hit flat hard forehands that barely bounce above your knees though. thats what i will be having trouble with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 12,900
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,437
|
no, this guy is an idiot. he will just slice it back to me on the baseline. i saw him play a guy who sliced, and all he did was slice back. he barely comes to the net for volley. he just is a pure baseliner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 12,900
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,437
|
i tried playing with continental in my groundstrokes and it doesnt feel right. in your sense, i cannot find the correct swingpath with that grip. im too used to western.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 480
|
I think that western grip is problematic not for low balls but for balls that are hit late. If you meet balls well in front of you, you can succesively hit a ball about a knee high. (the lower balls will be difficult, I admit). But if you are late, then even the ball at the hight of your waist will go down and to the right.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|