|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,437
|
I am just wondering, with all this talk about Wimbledon getting slower and US Open being the fastest hard court, do you think grass in London still a lot faster than hard in New York? Also, of all Masters (on hard) which one is the fastest and slowest?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
New User
|
I think that the grass is a little bit faster than the US Open hard court...the bounce is lower which will make it seem faster too...I believe that the Nasdaq is the fastest and the Pac Life Open is slowest
|
|
|
|
| Justyn Daniell |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Justyn Daniell |
|
|
#3 |
|
Baseline Basher
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Isn't the PLO hard? I thought clay was always slower than hard...
|
|
| Baseline Basher |
|
|
#4 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Parts unknown
Posts: 11,916
|
they resurface all the flushing meadows courts just before the open each year..i think they also resurface the other NY tourney just before the open too (assuming they still have it) to match. from what i know, they change the speed of the court based upon which US player(s) game they wish the courts to favour. With Agassi not a contender, I think they will set them up more to the liking of Roddick..thoughts? and do you think Roddicks game favours a faster hardcourt or a slower hardcourt? ed
__________________
Volkl DNX9 - Legend17 m's / IsoProClassic x's |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Professional
|
Roddick would like a faster hardcourt I bet. And for the fastest hardcourt masters series, I would say is Toronto or Cincinatti, Miami and IW are slower.
|
|
|
|
| PureCarlosMoyaDrive |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PureCarlosMoyaDrive |
|
|
#6 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 157
|
NoBadMojo...
If you are talking about the Hamlet cup now TD Waterhouse cup as the NY tournament before the Open, yes it is still around and I believe Agassi is playing in it this year. I'm not really sure if the surface there is the same as the open. |
|
|
|
| PistolPete |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PistolPete |
|
|
#7 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 650
|
So how do you "rig" the court for a fast court player. Make it smoother, with less grip? More like a hardwood floor than a rough, sandpaper-like finish? Has this ever been proven to have been done in the past by tounament officials at the highest and lowest levels?
|
|
|
|
| Brian Purdie |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Brian Purdie |
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Quote:
Whether it's done at the US Open is debatable - all I have on this is rumors, though I wouldn't at all be surprised. It would only be possible at a tournament at which the courts are resurfaced often enough - at the Open, that's done each year. So it's a possibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 650
|
okay, thank you for the explaination. I didn't know you how much variability you could have with the top layer. Now that you mention it, I do recall Wimby 2001. They changed the grass from a mix with rye to 100% rye to make it last longer and leave the grass firmer. We saw a few more rallys than usual that year, but it was a decision make very public by Wimby officials to encourage longer points and give the spectators a better show.
|
|
|
|
| Brian Purdie |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Brian Purdie |
|
|
#10 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 987
|
Hardcourt surfaces can get quite sophisticated. The amount of cushioning can vary a lot, and there are at least two kinds of sand in the top layer. One kind is round, mostly providing traction, while the sharp sand is very abrasive and really makes the ball bite and sit up more.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|